Robust regional differences in marine heatwaves between transient and stabilization responses at 1.5 °C global warming

The increase in frequency and duration of marine heatwaves (MHWs) under global warming brings great pressure to society. The high vulnerability of ecosystems to MHWs may lead to severe ecological and socioeconomic impacts. Most studies assessed future climate responses at the Paris Agreement tempera...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jiawei Liu, Jing-Jia Luo, Haiming Xu, Jing Ma, Jiechun Deng, Leying Zhang, Daohua Bi, Xi Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-06-01
Series:Weather and Climate Extremes
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212094721000141
id doaj-422fb6d02b28458da32d309f2bd0da9f
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jiawei Liu
Jing-Jia Luo
Haiming Xu
Jing Ma
Jiechun Deng
Leying Zhang
Daohua Bi
Xi Chen
spellingShingle Jiawei Liu
Jing-Jia Luo
Haiming Xu
Jing Ma
Jiechun Deng
Leying Zhang
Daohua Bi
Xi Chen
Robust regional differences in marine heatwaves between transient and stabilization responses at 1.5 °C global warming
Weather and Climate Extremes
Marine heatwaves
1.5 °C warming
Transient and stabilization responses
Regional differences
author_facet Jiawei Liu
Jing-Jia Luo
Haiming Xu
Jing Ma
Jiechun Deng
Leying Zhang
Daohua Bi
Xi Chen
author_sort Jiawei Liu
title Robust regional differences in marine heatwaves between transient and stabilization responses at 1.5 °C global warming
title_short Robust regional differences in marine heatwaves between transient and stabilization responses at 1.5 °C global warming
title_full Robust regional differences in marine heatwaves between transient and stabilization responses at 1.5 °C global warming
title_fullStr Robust regional differences in marine heatwaves between transient and stabilization responses at 1.5 °C global warming
title_full_unstemmed Robust regional differences in marine heatwaves between transient and stabilization responses at 1.5 °C global warming
title_sort robust regional differences in marine heatwaves between transient and stabilization responses at 1.5 °c global warming
publisher Elsevier
series Weather and Climate Extremes
issn 2212-0947
publishDate 2021-06-01
description The increase in frequency and duration of marine heatwaves (MHWs) under global warming brings great pressure to society. The high vulnerability of ecosystems to MHWs may lead to severe ecological and socioeconomic impacts. Most studies assessed future climate responses at the Paris Agreement temperature goals based on transient, rather than stabilization, model simulations. Here, we investigate the differences between transient and stabilization responses at global warming of 1.5 °C in terms of MHWs. Concentrations of greenhouse gases and response time scales to the anthropogenic forcing differ in these two types of simulations because subsurface ocean temperatures take decades to centuries to adjust under external forcing. While global mean metrics of MHWs show little difference between the transient and stabilization responses, significant regional disparities are revealed worldwide, including many climate change hotspots. Regionally intensified MHWs at stabilized 1.5 °C are mostly due to air-sea interactions and subsurface ocean warming that contributes to the stronger SST warming in eastern boundary upwelling systems and the southern Indian Ocean, indicative of potentially greater impacts on marine ecosystems in these regions. In contrast, MHWs would be alleviated in the central equatorial Pacific and Arctic in stabilization responses. Substantial differences in regional MHWs between the transient and stabilization responses oblige us to reconsider previous assessments regarding 1.5 °C warming and future mitigation pathways.
topic Marine heatwaves
1.5 °C warming
Transient and stabilization responses
Regional differences
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212094721000141
work_keys_str_mv AT jiaweiliu robustregionaldifferencesinmarineheatwavesbetweentransientandstabilizationresponsesat15cglobalwarming
AT jingjialuo robustregionaldifferencesinmarineheatwavesbetweentransientandstabilizationresponsesat15cglobalwarming
AT haimingxu robustregionaldifferencesinmarineheatwavesbetweentransientandstabilizationresponsesat15cglobalwarming
AT jingma robustregionaldifferencesinmarineheatwavesbetweentransientandstabilizationresponsesat15cglobalwarming
AT jiechundeng robustregionaldifferencesinmarineheatwavesbetweentransientandstabilizationresponsesat15cglobalwarming
AT leyingzhang robustregionaldifferencesinmarineheatwavesbetweentransientandstabilizationresponsesat15cglobalwarming
AT daohuabi robustregionaldifferencesinmarineheatwavesbetweentransientandstabilizationresponsesat15cglobalwarming
AT xichen robustregionaldifferencesinmarineheatwavesbetweentransientandstabilizationresponsesat15cglobalwarming
_version_ 1721430858378772480
spelling doaj-422fb6d02b28458da32d309f2bd0da9f2021-05-22T04:36:52ZengElsevierWeather and Climate Extremes2212-09472021-06-0132100316Robust regional differences in marine heatwaves between transient and stabilization responses at 1.5 °C global warmingJiawei Liu0Jing-Jia Luo1Haiming Xu2Jing Ma3Jiechun Deng4Leying Zhang5Daohua Bi6Xi Chen7Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD)/Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disasters, Ministry of Education (KLME)/Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment Change (ILCEC), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, 210044, Nanjing, ChinaCollaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD)/Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disasters, Ministry of Education (KLME)/Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment Change (ILCEC), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, 210044, Nanjing, China; Institute for Climate and Application Research (ICAR), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, 210044, Nanjing, China; Corresponding author. Institute for Climate and Application Research (ICAR), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, 210044, Nanjing, China.Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD)/Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disasters, Ministry of Education (KLME)/Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment Change (ILCEC), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, 210044, Nanjing, China; Corresponding author.Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD)/Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disasters, Ministry of Education (KLME)/Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment Change (ILCEC), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, 210044, Nanjing, ChinaCollaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD)/Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disasters, Ministry of Education (KLME)/Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment Change (ILCEC), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, 210044, Nanjing, ChinaJoint Innovation Center for Modern Forestry Studies, College of Biology and Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, ChinaClimate Science Centre, CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Aspendale, Victoria, 3195, AustraliaKey Laboratory of Environmental Change and Natural Disaster of Ministry of Education, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, ChinaThe increase in frequency and duration of marine heatwaves (MHWs) under global warming brings great pressure to society. The high vulnerability of ecosystems to MHWs may lead to severe ecological and socioeconomic impacts. Most studies assessed future climate responses at the Paris Agreement temperature goals based on transient, rather than stabilization, model simulations. Here, we investigate the differences between transient and stabilization responses at global warming of 1.5 °C in terms of MHWs. Concentrations of greenhouse gases and response time scales to the anthropogenic forcing differ in these two types of simulations because subsurface ocean temperatures take decades to centuries to adjust under external forcing. While global mean metrics of MHWs show little difference between the transient and stabilization responses, significant regional disparities are revealed worldwide, including many climate change hotspots. Regionally intensified MHWs at stabilized 1.5 °C are mostly due to air-sea interactions and subsurface ocean warming that contributes to the stronger SST warming in eastern boundary upwelling systems and the southern Indian Ocean, indicative of potentially greater impacts on marine ecosystems in these regions. In contrast, MHWs would be alleviated in the central equatorial Pacific and Arctic in stabilization responses. Substantial differences in regional MHWs between the transient and stabilization responses oblige us to reconsider previous assessments regarding 1.5 °C warming and future mitigation pathways.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212094721000141Marine heatwaves1.5 °C warmingTransient and stabilization responsesRegional differences