Shifting Sands

The so-called ‘sham’ marriage industry, and approaches to marriages of convenience present a field of discursive meanings in politics and public discourse. In Ireland, policy and legislation between 2006 and 2016 was dominated by a metadiscursive negotiation of terminology relating to the exploitat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stephanie Hanlon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Irish Association for Applied Linguistics 2021-06-01
Series:Teanga: The Journal of the Irish Association for Applied Linguistics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.iraal.ie/index.php/teanga/article/view/494
id doaj-422b3b84909d46d187acadfb2a58cd16
record_format Article
spelling doaj-422b3b84909d46d187acadfb2a58cd162021-06-06T13:13:50ZengThe Irish Association for Applied LinguisticsTeanga: The Journal of the Irish Association for Applied Linguistics 0332-205X2565-63252021-06-0112Shifting SandsStephanie Hanlon0University College Dublin and Carlow College The so-called ‘sham’ marriage industry, and approaches to marriages of convenience present a field of discursive meanings in politics and public discourse. In Ireland, policy and legislation between 2006 and 2016 was dominated by a metadiscursive negotiation of terminology relating to the exploitation and abuse of Irish women for immigration purposes, the abuse of the Irish immigration system, and the attack on marriage. The term ‘marriage of convenience’[1] has evolved with many policy collaborators and has been shifting in public and policy discourse. This study presents a dual approach encompassing corpus linguistics and critical discourse analysis of the normalization of the Immigrant Council of Ireland’s policies on MoC[2]. This paper has found multiple inconsistencies and contradictions in the ICI’s positions, with evidence of exclusionary rhetoric and racial discrimination in the NGO’s policy on MoC. The meanings and implications of victim and perpetrator continue to shift and change depending on the context and purpose of their articulation, raising clear questions about the ‘re’ - presentation and ‘re’ - location of MoC in immigration policy and legislation. More broadly, it calls for a more critical and open debate that reflects the impacts of restrictive policy on persons involved. [1]Henceforth referred to as “MoC”. [2] Henceforth referred to as “ICI”. https://journal.iraal.ie/index.php/teanga/article/view/494critical discourse analysismarriage migrationcitizenshipracismNGOs
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stephanie Hanlon
spellingShingle Stephanie Hanlon
Shifting Sands
Teanga: The Journal of the Irish Association for Applied Linguistics
critical discourse analysis
marriage migration
citizenship
racism
NGOs
author_facet Stephanie Hanlon
author_sort Stephanie Hanlon
title Shifting Sands
title_short Shifting Sands
title_full Shifting Sands
title_fullStr Shifting Sands
title_full_unstemmed Shifting Sands
title_sort shifting sands
publisher The Irish Association for Applied Linguistics
series Teanga: The Journal of the Irish Association for Applied Linguistics
issn 0332-205X
2565-6325
publishDate 2021-06-01
description The so-called ‘sham’ marriage industry, and approaches to marriages of convenience present a field of discursive meanings in politics and public discourse. In Ireland, policy and legislation between 2006 and 2016 was dominated by a metadiscursive negotiation of terminology relating to the exploitation and abuse of Irish women for immigration purposes, the abuse of the Irish immigration system, and the attack on marriage. The term ‘marriage of convenience’[1] has evolved with many policy collaborators and has been shifting in public and policy discourse. This study presents a dual approach encompassing corpus linguistics and critical discourse analysis of the normalization of the Immigrant Council of Ireland’s policies on MoC[2]. This paper has found multiple inconsistencies and contradictions in the ICI’s positions, with evidence of exclusionary rhetoric and racial discrimination in the NGO’s policy on MoC. The meanings and implications of victim and perpetrator continue to shift and change depending on the context and purpose of their articulation, raising clear questions about the ‘re’ - presentation and ‘re’ - location of MoC in immigration policy and legislation. More broadly, it calls for a more critical and open debate that reflects the impacts of restrictive policy on persons involved. [1]Henceforth referred to as “MoC”. [2] Henceforth referred to as “ICI”.
topic critical discourse analysis
marriage migration
citizenship
racism
NGOs
url https://journal.iraal.ie/index.php/teanga/article/view/494
work_keys_str_mv AT stephaniehanlon shiftingsands
_version_ 1721393439652708352