The right place? Users and professionals’ constructions of the place’s influence on personal recovery in community mental health services

Abstract Background Current mental health policy emphasizes the importance of community-based service delivery for people with mental health problems to encompass personal recovery. The aim of this study is to explore how users and professionals construct the place’s influence on personal recovery i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ingrid Femdal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-05-01
Series:International Journal of Mental Health Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13033-018-0209-z
id doaj-4225195752464f3db18cc93a33b5caa5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4225195752464f3db18cc93a33b5caa52020-11-25T01:21:16ZengBMCInternational Journal of Mental Health Systems1752-44582018-05-011211910.1186/s13033-018-0209-zThe right place? Users and professionals’ constructions of the place’s influence on personal recovery in community mental health servicesIngrid Femdal0Department of Health and Social Work Studies, Østfold University CollegeAbstract Background Current mental health policy emphasizes the importance of community-based service delivery for people with mental health problems to encompass personal recovery. The aim of this study is to explore how users and professionals construct the place’s influence on personal recovery in community mental health services. Methods This is a qualitative, interpretive study based on ten individual, semi-structured interviews with users and professionals, respectively. A discourse analysis inspired by the work of Foucault was used to analyze the interviews. Results The findings show how place can be constructed as a potential for and as a barrier against recovery. Constructions of the aim of the services matter when choosing a place for the services. Further, constructions of user–professional relationships and flexibility are important in the constructions of an appropriate place for the services. Conclusions The aim of the service, the user–professional relationship, and flexibility in choosing place were essential in the participants’ constructions. To find “the right place” for mental health services was constructed as context-sensitive and complex processes of assessment and co-determination. Trial registration The study is approved by the Regional Committee for Medical Research Ethics, Norway (REK-Midt 2011/2057)http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13033-018-0209-zCommunity mental health servicesPersonal recoveryPlaceProductive powerSocial constructionism
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ingrid Femdal
spellingShingle Ingrid Femdal
The right place? Users and professionals’ constructions of the place’s influence on personal recovery in community mental health services
International Journal of Mental Health Systems
Community mental health services
Personal recovery
Place
Productive power
Social constructionism
author_facet Ingrid Femdal
author_sort Ingrid Femdal
title The right place? Users and professionals’ constructions of the place’s influence on personal recovery in community mental health services
title_short The right place? Users and professionals’ constructions of the place’s influence on personal recovery in community mental health services
title_full The right place? Users and professionals’ constructions of the place’s influence on personal recovery in community mental health services
title_fullStr The right place? Users and professionals’ constructions of the place’s influence on personal recovery in community mental health services
title_full_unstemmed The right place? Users and professionals’ constructions of the place’s influence on personal recovery in community mental health services
title_sort right place? users and professionals’ constructions of the place’s influence on personal recovery in community mental health services
publisher BMC
series International Journal of Mental Health Systems
issn 1752-4458
publishDate 2018-05-01
description Abstract Background Current mental health policy emphasizes the importance of community-based service delivery for people with mental health problems to encompass personal recovery. The aim of this study is to explore how users and professionals construct the place’s influence on personal recovery in community mental health services. Methods This is a qualitative, interpretive study based on ten individual, semi-structured interviews with users and professionals, respectively. A discourse analysis inspired by the work of Foucault was used to analyze the interviews. Results The findings show how place can be constructed as a potential for and as a barrier against recovery. Constructions of the aim of the services matter when choosing a place for the services. Further, constructions of user–professional relationships and flexibility are important in the constructions of an appropriate place for the services. Conclusions The aim of the service, the user–professional relationship, and flexibility in choosing place were essential in the participants’ constructions. To find “the right place” for mental health services was constructed as context-sensitive and complex processes of assessment and co-determination. Trial registration The study is approved by the Regional Committee for Medical Research Ethics, Norway (REK-Midt 2011/2057)
topic Community mental health services
Personal recovery
Place
Productive power
Social constructionism
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13033-018-0209-z
work_keys_str_mv AT ingridfemdal therightplaceusersandprofessionalsconstructionsoftheplacesinfluenceonpersonalrecoveryincommunitymentalhealthservices
AT ingridfemdal rightplaceusersandprofessionalsconstructionsoftheplacesinfluenceonpersonalrecoveryincommunitymentalhealthservices
_version_ 1725131270395002880