Depth Effect on Lightness Revisited: The Role of Articulation, Proximity and Fields of Illumination

The coplanar ratio principle proposes that when the luminance range in an image is larger than the canonical reflectance range of 30:1, the lightness of a target surface depends on the luminance ratio between that target and its adjacent coplanar neighbor (Gilchrist, 1980 ). This conclusion is based...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ana Radonjić, Alan L. Gilchrist
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2013-09-01
Series:i-Perception
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1068/i0575
id doaj-422313676d094a778fe77fe161039cad
record_format Article
spelling doaj-422313676d094a778fe77fe161039cad2020-11-25T01:27:14ZengSAGE Publishingi-Perception2041-66952013-09-01410.1068/i057510.1068_i0575Depth Effect on Lightness Revisited: The Role of Articulation, Proximity and Fields of IlluminationAna RadonjićAlan L. GilchristThe coplanar ratio principle proposes that when the luminance range in an image is larger than the canonical reflectance range of 30:1, the lightness of a target surface depends on the luminance ratio between that target and its adjacent coplanar neighbor (Gilchrist, 1980 ). This conclusion is based on experiments in which changes in the perceived target depth produced large changes in its perceived lightness without significantly altering the observers' retinal image. Using the same paradigm, we explored how this depth effect on lightness depends on display complexity (articulation), proximity of the target to its highest coplanar luminance and spatial distribution of fields of illumination. Importantly, our experiments allowed us to test differing predictions made by the anchoring theory (Gilchrist et al., 1999 ), the coplanar ratio principle, as well as other models. We report three main findings, generally consistent with anchoring theory predictions: (1) Articulation can substantially increase the depth effect. (2) Target lightness depends not on the adjacent luminance but on the highest coplanar luminance, irrespective of its position relative to the target. (3) When a plane contains multiple fields of illumination, target lightness depends on the highest luminance in its field of illumination, not on the highest coplanar luminance.https://doi.org/10.1068/i0575
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ana Radonjić
Alan L. Gilchrist
spellingShingle Ana Radonjić
Alan L. Gilchrist
Depth Effect on Lightness Revisited: The Role of Articulation, Proximity and Fields of Illumination
i-Perception
author_facet Ana Radonjić
Alan L. Gilchrist
author_sort Ana Radonjić
title Depth Effect on Lightness Revisited: The Role of Articulation, Proximity and Fields of Illumination
title_short Depth Effect on Lightness Revisited: The Role of Articulation, Proximity and Fields of Illumination
title_full Depth Effect on Lightness Revisited: The Role of Articulation, Proximity and Fields of Illumination
title_fullStr Depth Effect on Lightness Revisited: The Role of Articulation, Proximity and Fields of Illumination
title_full_unstemmed Depth Effect on Lightness Revisited: The Role of Articulation, Proximity and Fields of Illumination
title_sort depth effect on lightness revisited: the role of articulation, proximity and fields of illumination
publisher SAGE Publishing
series i-Perception
issn 2041-6695
publishDate 2013-09-01
description The coplanar ratio principle proposes that when the luminance range in an image is larger than the canonical reflectance range of 30:1, the lightness of a target surface depends on the luminance ratio between that target and its adjacent coplanar neighbor (Gilchrist, 1980 ). This conclusion is based on experiments in which changes in the perceived target depth produced large changes in its perceived lightness without significantly altering the observers' retinal image. Using the same paradigm, we explored how this depth effect on lightness depends on display complexity (articulation), proximity of the target to its highest coplanar luminance and spatial distribution of fields of illumination. Importantly, our experiments allowed us to test differing predictions made by the anchoring theory (Gilchrist et al., 1999 ), the coplanar ratio principle, as well as other models. We report three main findings, generally consistent with anchoring theory predictions: (1) Articulation can substantially increase the depth effect. (2) Target lightness depends not on the adjacent luminance but on the highest coplanar luminance, irrespective of its position relative to the target. (3) When a plane contains multiple fields of illumination, target lightness depends on the highest luminance in its field of illumination, not on the highest coplanar luminance.
url https://doi.org/10.1068/i0575
work_keys_str_mv AT anaradonjic deptheffectonlightnessrevisitedtheroleofarticulationproximityandfieldsofillumination
AT alanlgilchrist deptheffectonlightnessrevisitedtheroleofarticulationproximityandfieldsofillumination
_version_ 1725105981804773376