“The Genius of Tomorrow Smashed into Atoms”. On Piotr Chmielowski and Antoni Lange Diagnosing their Era

<p>The article presents an unofficial discussion that took place between one of the most prominent Polish critics of the late 19th century and Antoni Lange, a raising poet of the 90s, whose work had gained little attention from the older colleague. Mentioned briefly in Chmielowski’s <em>...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marcin Jauksz
Format: Article
Language:Polish
Published: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie Studia Polonistyczne WFPiK UAM; Wydawnictwo Poznańskiego Towarzystwa Przyjaciół Nauk 2012-01-01
Series:Poznańskie Studia Polonistyczne. Seria Literacka
Subjects:
Online Access:http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/pspsl/article/view/2239
id doaj-421b23f9865441bab6fafefc572403fd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-421b23f9865441bab6fafefc572403fd2020-11-24T22:29:17ZpolWydawnictwo Poznańskie Studia Polonistyczne WFPiK UAM; Wydawnictwo Poznańskiego Towarzystwa Przyjaciół NaukPoznańskie Studia Polonistyczne. Seria Literacka1233-86802450-49472012-01-0101914115510.14746/pspsl.2012.19.102212“The Genius of Tomorrow Smashed into Atoms”. On Piotr Chmielowski and Antoni Lange Diagnosing their EraMarcin Jauksz<p>The article presents an unofficial discussion that took place between one of the most prominent Polish critics of the late 19th century and Antoni Lange, a raising poet of the 90s, whose work had gained little attention from the older colleague. Mentioned briefly in Chmielowski’s <em>Współczesni poeci polscy </em>in 1895, Lange responded to some of the critic’s fterwards. Chmielowski did not respond to that directly, however, his review of Lange’s volume of poetry published at the time and the will to defend his claims using the adversary’s poetry as a pretext shows that the young poet had succeeded in provoking the respected critic to take defensive position. The two writers, discussing an ongoing ‘crisis’ of poetry, present their own perspectives on the roots of the situation. Chmielowski’s claims from the beginning of the 20th century prove that the dispute, unofficial as it was, was won by Antoni Lange.</p>http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/pspsl/article/view/2239modernism literary, debates of the Young Poland periodliterary criticismYoung Poland’s poetrygeneration strife in the late 19th century
collection DOAJ
language Polish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marcin Jauksz
spellingShingle Marcin Jauksz
“The Genius of Tomorrow Smashed into Atoms”. On Piotr Chmielowski and Antoni Lange Diagnosing their Era
Poznańskie Studia Polonistyczne. Seria Literacka
modernism literary, debates of the Young Poland period
literary criticism
Young Poland’s poetry
generation strife in the late 19th century
author_facet Marcin Jauksz
author_sort Marcin Jauksz
title “The Genius of Tomorrow Smashed into Atoms”. On Piotr Chmielowski and Antoni Lange Diagnosing their Era
title_short “The Genius of Tomorrow Smashed into Atoms”. On Piotr Chmielowski and Antoni Lange Diagnosing their Era
title_full “The Genius of Tomorrow Smashed into Atoms”. On Piotr Chmielowski and Antoni Lange Diagnosing their Era
title_fullStr “The Genius of Tomorrow Smashed into Atoms”. On Piotr Chmielowski and Antoni Lange Diagnosing their Era
title_full_unstemmed “The Genius of Tomorrow Smashed into Atoms”. On Piotr Chmielowski and Antoni Lange Diagnosing their Era
title_sort “the genius of tomorrow smashed into atoms”. on piotr chmielowski and antoni lange diagnosing their era
publisher Wydawnictwo Poznańskie Studia Polonistyczne WFPiK UAM; Wydawnictwo Poznańskiego Towarzystwa Przyjaciół Nauk
series Poznańskie Studia Polonistyczne. Seria Literacka
issn 1233-8680
2450-4947
publishDate 2012-01-01
description <p>The article presents an unofficial discussion that took place between one of the most prominent Polish critics of the late 19th century and Antoni Lange, a raising poet of the 90s, whose work had gained little attention from the older colleague. Mentioned briefly in Chmielowski’s <em>Współczesni poeci polscy </em>in 1895, Lange responded to some of the critic’s fterwards. Chmielowski did not respond to that directly, however, his review of Lange’s volume of poetry published at the time and the will to defend his claims using the adversary’s poetry as a pretext shows that the young poet had succeeded in provoking the respected critic to take defensive position. The two writers, discussing an ongoing ‘crisis’ of poetry, present their own perspectives on the roots of the situation. Chmielowski’s claims from the beginning of the 20th century prove that the dispute, unofficial as it was, was won by Antoni Lange.</p>
topic modernism literary, debates of the Young Poland period
literary criticism
Young Poland’s poetry
generation strife in the late 19th century
url http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/pspsl/article/view/2239
work_keys_str_mv AT marcinjauksz thegeniusoftomorrowsmashedintoatomsonpiotrchmielowskiandantonilangediagnosingtheirera
_version_ 1725744148878721024