DETECTION OF TERRAIN STRUCTURES IN AIRBORNE LASER SCANNING DATA USING DEEP LEARNING

• Main Authors: B. Kazimi, F. Thiemann, M. Sester
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Copernicus Publications 2020-08-01
• Series: ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
• Online Access: https://www.isprs-ann-photogramm-remote-sens-spatial-inf-sci.net/V-2-2020/493/2020/isprs-annals-V-2-2020-493-2020.pdf

Automated recognition of terrain structures is a major research problem in many application areas. These structures can be investigated in raster products such as Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) generated from Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) data. Following the success of deep learning and computer vision techniques on color images, researchers have focused on the application of such techniques in their respective fields. One example is detection of structures in DEM data. DEM data can be used to train deep learning models, but recently, Du et al. (2019) proposed a multi-modal deep learning approach (hereafter referred to as MM) proving that combination of geomorphological information help improve the performance of deep learning models. They reported that combining DEM, slope, and RGB-shaded relief gives the best result among other combinations consisting of curvature, flow accumulation, topographic wetness index, and grey-shaded relief. In this work, we approve and build on top of this approach. First, we use MM and show that combinations of other information such as sky view factors, (simple) local relief models, openness, and local dominance improve model performance even further. Secondly, based on the recently proposed HR-Net (Sun et al., 2019), we build a tinier, Multi-Modal High Resolution network called MM-HR, that outperforms MM. MM-HR learns with fewer parameters (4 millions), and gives an accuracy of 84:2 percent on ZISM50m data compared to 79:2 percent accuracy by MM which learns with more parameters (11 millions). On the dataset of archaeological mining structures from Harz, the top accuracy by MM-HR is 91:7 percent compared to 90:2 by MM.