Linking TIMSS and NAEP assessments to evaluate international trends in achievement

The Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) makes it possible to compare the performance of students in the US in Mathematics and Science to the performance of students in other countries. TIMSS uses four international benchmarks for describing student achievement: Low, Interme...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hwanggyu Lim, Stephen G. Sireci
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Arizona State University 2017-02-01
Series:Education Policy Analysis Archives
Subjects:
Online Access:https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/2682
id doaj-420eb89080864f4cb2a3312ca11e080b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-420eb89080864f4cb2a3312ca11e080b2020-11-25T03:46:28ZengArizona State UniversityEducation Policy Analysis Archives1068-23412017-02-0125010.14507/epaa.25.26821582Linking TIMSS and NAEP assessments to evaluate international trends in achievementHwanggyu Lim0Stephen G. Sireci1University of Massachusetts AmherstUniversity of Massachusetts AmherstThe Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) makes it possible to compare the performance of students in the US in Mathematics and Science to the performance of students in other countries. TIMSS uses four international benchmarks for describing student achievement: Low, Intermediate, High, and Advanced. In this study, we linked the eighth-grade Math TIMSS and NAEP scales using equipercentile equating to (a) help better interpret U.S. eighth-grade students’ performance on TIMSS, and (b) investigate the progress of eighth-grade U.S. students over time relative to the progress of students in other countries. Results indicated that relative to other countries, U.S. eighth-grade students increased with respect to the “At or Above Basic” NAEP Achievement level, but that other countries saw larger improvements in the higher achievement level categories, relative to the US. This finding may reflect the emphasis of No Child Left Behind on raising lower achievement to “proficient.” However, with respect to “Advanced” mathematics achievement, eighth-grade U.S. students showed less improvement than students in other countries.https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/2682achievement levels, equipercentile equating, international assessment, linking, NAEP, TIMSS
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hwanggyu Lim
Stephen G. Sireci
spellingShingle Hwanggyu Lim
Stephen G. Sireci
Linking TIMSS and NAEP assessments to evaluate international trends in achievement
Education Policy Analysis Archives
achievement levels, equipercentile equating, international assessment, linking, NAEP, TIMSS
author_facet Hwanggyu Lim
Stephen G. Sireci
author_sort Hwanggyu Lim
title Linking TIMSS and NAEP assessments to evaluate international trends in achievement
title_short Linking TIMSS and NAEP assessments to evaluate international trends in achievement
title_full Linking TIMSS and NAEP assessments to evaluate international trends in achievement
title_fullStr Linking TIMSS and NAEP assessments to evaluate international trends in achievement
title_full_unstemmed Linking TIMSS and NAEP assessments to evaluate international trends in achievement
title_sort linking timss and naep assessments to evaluate international trends in achievement
publisher Arizona State University
series Education Policy Analysis Archives
issn 1068-2341
publishDate 2017-02-01
description The Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) makes it possible to compare the performance of students in the US in Mathematics and Science to the performance of students in other countries. TIMSS uses four international benchmarks for describing student achievement: Low, Intermediate, High, and Advanced. In this study, we linked the eighth-grade Math TIMSS and NAEP scales using equipercentile equating to (a) help better interpret U.S. eighth-grade students’ performance on TIMSS, and (b) investigate the progress of eighth-grade U.S. students over time relative to the progress of students in other countries. Results indicated that relative to other countries, U.S. eighth-grade students increased with respect to the “At or Above Basic” NAEP Achievement level, but that other countries saw larger improvements in the higher achievement level categories, relative to the US. This finding may reflect the emphasis of No Child Left Behind on raising lower achievement to “proficient.” However, with respect to “Advanced” mathematics achievement, eighth-grade U.S. students showed less improvement than students in other countries.
topic achievement levels, equipercentile equating, international assessment, linking, NAEP, TIMSS
url https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/2682
work_keys_str_mv AT hwanggyulim linkingtimssandnaepassessmentstoevaluateinternationaltrendsinachievement
AT stephengsireci linkingtimssandnaepassessmentstoevaluateinternationaltrendsinachievement
_version_ 1724506270209146880