Linking TIMSS and NAEP assessments to evaluate international trends in achievement
The Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) makes it possible to compare the performance of students in the US in Mathematics and Science to the performance of students in other countries. TIMSS uses four international benchmarks for describing student achievement: Low, Interme...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Arizona State University
2017-02-01
|
Series: | Education Policy Analysis Archives |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/2682 |
id |
doaj-420eb89080864f4cb2a3312ca11e080b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-420eb89080864f4cb2a3312ca11e080b2020-11-25T03:46:28ZengArizona State UniversityEducation Policy Analysis Archives1068-23412017-02-0125010.14507/epaa.25.26821582Linking TIMSS and NAEP assessments to evaluate international trends in achievementHwanggyu Lim0Stephen G. Sireci1University of Massachusetts AmherstUniversity of Massachusetts AmherstThe Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) makes it possible to compare the performance of students in the US in Mathematics and Science to the performance of students in other countries. TIMSS uses four international benchmarks for describing student achievement: Low, Intermediate, High, and Advanced. In this study, we linked the eighth-grade Math TIMSS and NAEP scales using equipercentile equating to (a) help better interpret U.S. eighth-grade students’ performance on TIMSS, and (b) investigate the progress of eighth-grade U.S. students over time relative to the progress of students in other countries. Results indicated that relative to other countries, U.S. eighth-grade students increased with respect to the “At or Above Basic” NAEP Achievement level, but that other countries saw larger improvements in the higher achievement level categories, relative to the US. This finding may reflect the emphasis of No Child Left Behind on raising lower achievement to “proficient.” However, with respect to “Advanced” mathematics achievement, eighth-grade U.S. students showed less improvement than students in other countries.https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/2682achievement levels, equipercentile equating, international assessment, linking, NAEP, TIMSS |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Hwanggyu Lim Stephen G. Sireci |
spellingShingle |
Hwanggyu Lim Stephen G. Sireci Linking TIMSS and NAEP assessments to evaluate international trends in achievement Education Policy Analysis Archives achievement levels, equipercentile equating, international assessment, linking, NAEP, TIMSS |
author_facet |
Hwanggyu Lim Stephen G. Sireci |
author_sort |
Hwanggyu Lim |
title |
Linking TIMSS and NAEP assessments to evaluate international trends in achievement |
title_short |
Linking TIMSS and NAEP assessments to evaluate international trends in achievement |
title_full |
Linking TIMSS and NAEP assessments to evaluate international trends in achievement |
title_fullStr |
Linking TIMSS and NAEP assessments to evaluate international trends in achievement |
title_full_unstemmed |
Linking TIMSS and NAEP assessments to evaluate international trends in achievement |
title_sort |
linking timss and naep assessments to evaluate international trends in achievement |
publisher |
Arizona State University |
series |
Education Policy Analysis Archives |
issn |
1068-2341 |
publishDate |
2017-02-01 |
description |
The Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) makes it possible to compare the performance of students in the US in Mathematics and Science to the performance of students in other countries. TIMSS uses four international benchmarks for describing student achievement: Low, Intermediate, High, and Advanced. In this study, we linked the eighth-grade Math TIMSS and NAEP scales using equipercentile equating to (a) help better interpret U.S. eighth-grade students’ performance on TIMSS, and (b) investigate the progress of eighth-grade U.S. students over time relative to the progress of students in other countries. Results indicated that relative to other countries, U.S. eighth-grade students increased with respect to the “At or Above Basic” NAEP Achievement level, but that other countries saw larger improvements in the higher achievement level categories, relative to the US. This finding may reflect the emphasis of No Child Left Behind on raising lower achievement to “proficient.” However, with respect to “Advanced” mathematics achievement, eighth-grade U.S. students showed less improvement than students in other countries. |
topic |
achievement levels, equipercentile equating, international assessment, linking, NAEP, TIMSS |
url |
https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/2682 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hwanggyulim linkingtimssandnaepassessmentstoevaluateinternationaltrendsinachievement AT stephengsireci linkingtimssandnaepassessmentstoevaluateinternationaltrendsinachievement |
_version_ |
1724506270209146880 |