Routes of Industrial Heritage: On the Animation of Sedentary Objects

In this article, the recent proliferation of cultural heritage routes and networks will be analyzed as an attempt to animate and revitalize idle artefacts and landscapes. With a specific focus on the sedentary, immobile sites of former industrial production, it will be claimed that the route is an a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Torgeir Rinke Bangstad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Linköping University Electronic Press 2011-10-01
Series:Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.113279
id doaj-4200167047b447a2be34933a6c6b7b2c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4200167047b447a2be34933a6c6b7b2c2020-11-24T23:03:38ZengLinköping University Electronic PressCulture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research2000-15252011-10-013279294Routes of Industrial Heritage: On the Animation of Sedentary ObjectsTorgeir Rinke BangstadIn this article, the recent proliferation of cultural heritage routes and networks will be analyzed as an attempt to animate and revitalize idle artefacts and landscapes. With a specific focus on the sedentary, immobile sites of former industrial production, it will be claimed that the route is an appropriate and understandable way of dealing with industrial sites that have lost their stable place in a sequence of productions. If the operational production site is understood as a place of where, above all, function and efficiency guide the systematic interaction between labour, raw material and technology, then the absence of this order is what makes an abandoned factory seem so isolated and out of place. It becomes disconnected from the web of production of which it was part and from which it gained its meaning and stability. In this regard, it makes sense to think of industrial heritage routes as an effort to bring the isolated site back into place. Following Barbara Kirshenblatt Gimblett, we have come to think of cultural heritage as an opportunity that is granted to artifacts, lifestyles and places of a 'second life'. Industrial heritage routes occasion such a reanimation of former industrial sites according to the principles cultural tourism, place production, professional networking and best practice learning. As a mode of operation, the route has some potential advantages over the bounded, site-specific approach. It extends the historic context of the site in question beyond the isolated, geographical location. Orchestrating sites in a wider heritage network is a way of emphasizing a notion of culture that stresses interaction, movement and encounters with that which lies beyond the local. It may also grant heritage professionals an opportunity to work in closer relation to what goes on elsewhere.http://dx.doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.113279Industrial heritageroutenetworksRoute IndustriekultursiteERIH
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Torgeir Rinke Bangstad
spellingShingle Torgeir Rinke Bangstad
Routes of Industrial Heritage: On the Animation of Sedentary Objects
Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research
Industrial heritage
route
networks
Route Industriekultur
site
ERIH
author_facet Torgeir Rinke Bangstad
author_sort Torgeir Rinke Bangstad
title Routes of Industrial Heritage: On the Animation of Sedentary Objects
title_short Routes of Industrial Heritage: On the Animation of Sedentary Objects
title_full Routes of Industrial Heritage: On the Animation of Sedentary Objects
title_fullStr Routes of Industrial Heritage: On the Animation of Sedentary Objects
title_full_unstemmed Routes of Industrial Heritage: On the Animation of Sedentary Objects
title_sort routes of industrial heritage: on the animation of sedentary objects
publisher Linköping University Electronic Press
series Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research
issn 2000-1525
publishDate 2011-10-01
description In this article, the recent proliferation of cultural heritage routes and networks will be analyzed as an attempt to animate and revitalize idle artefacts and landscapes. With a specific focus on the sedentary, immobile sites of former industrial production, it will be claimed that the route is an appropriate and understandable way of dealing with industrial sites that have lost their stable place in a sequence of productions. If the operational production site is understood as a place of where, above all, function and efficiency guide the systematic interaction between labour, raw material and technology, then the absence of this order is what makes an abandoned factory seem so isolated and out of place. It becomes disconnected from the web of production of which it was part and from which it gained its meaning and stability. In this regard, it makes sense to think of industrial heritage routes as an effort to bring the isolated site back into place. Following Barbara Kirshenblatt Gimblett, we have come to think of cultural heritage as an opportunity that is granted to artifacts, lifestyles and places of a 'second life'. Industrial heritage routes occasion such a reanimation of former industrial sites according to the principles cultural tourism, place production, professional networking and best practice learning. As a mode of operation, the route has some potential advantages over the bounded, site-specific approach. It extends the historic context of the site in question beyond the isolated, geographical location. Orchestrating sites in a wider heritage network is a way of emphasizing a notion of culture that stresses interaction, movement and encounters with that which lies beyond the local. It may also grant heritage professionals an opportunity to work in closer relation to what goes on elsewhere.
topic Industrial heritage
route
networks
Route Industriekultur
site
ERIH
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.113279
work_keys_str_mv AT torgeirrinkebangstad routesofindustrialheritageontheanimationofsedentaryobjects
_version_ 1725632957133094912