Efficacy of Prone Lumbar Traction on Chronic Discogenic Low Back Pain and Disability

Objectives: To compare the outcomes of prone and supine lumbar traction in patients with chronic discogenic low back pain. Methods: The test was prospective and randomized control trial. The structure of trial was Urban Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation clinic. Participants was...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mahmoud Beyki, Mohsen Abedi, Farin Soleimani, Mohammaad Mousavi, Reza Roghani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Negah Institute for Scientific Communication 2007-09-01
Series:Iranian Rehabilitation Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irj.uswr.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-12&slc_lang=en&sid=1
Description
Summary:Objectives: To compare the outcomes of prone and supine lumbar traction in patients with chronic discogenic low back pain. Methods:&nbsp;The test was prospective and&nbsp;randomized control trial. The structure of trial was Urban Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation clinic. Participants was included of A total of 124 subjects with chronic low back pain (LBP) and evidence of a degenerative and/or herniated inter-vertebral disk at 1 or more levels of the lumbar spine, who have not our exclusion criteria. There was A 4-week course of lumbar traction, prone or supine in case and control groups consecutively, consisting of six 30-minute sessions every other days, followed by four 30-minute sessions every 3 days.&nbsp;The numeric Visual pain rating scale and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were completed at pre-intervention and discharge (within 2 weeks of the last visit). Results: A total of 124 subjects completed the treatment protocol. We noted significant improvements for all post-intervention outcome scores when compared with pre-intervention scores (P<0.01). Also found significant difference between 2 groups in favor of prone traction (P<0.01) Discussion: Traction applied in the prone position for 4 weeks was associated with improvements in pain intensity and ODI scores at discharge, in a sample of patients with activity limiting LBP. However, because we lacked a reasonable long time follow-up, we cannot imply a long lasting relationship between the traction and outcome, and a long time follow-up is suggested.
ISSN:1735-3602
1735-3610