AustArch: A Database of 14C and Non-14C Ages from Archaeological Sites in Australia - Composition, Compilation and Review (Data Paper)

It has been 20 years since Smith and Sharp (1993) undertook the first comprehensive review of archaeological ages across Australia and used them as a proxy for exploring human activity in the Pleistocene. It was a pioneering paper, building on the preliminary application of these techniques in Austr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alan N. Williams, Sean Ulm, Mike Smith, Jill Reid
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of York 2014-06-01
Series:Internet Archaeology
Subjects:
id doaj-41e870d68eea42209335a42dff489b5e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-41e870d68eea42209335a42dff489b5e2020-11-24T22:36:03ZengUniversity of YorkInternet Archaeology1363-53872014-06-013610.11141/ia.36.6 AustArch: A Database of 14C and Non-14C Ages from Archaeological Sites in Australia - Composition, Compilation and Review (Data Paper)Alan N. Williams0Sean Ulm1Mike Smith2Jill Reid3Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National UniversityDepartment of Anthropology, Archaeology and Sociology, School of Arts and Social Sciences, James Cook UniversityNational Museum of AustraliaNiche Environment and Heritage, AustraliaIt has been 20 years since Smith and Sharp (1993) undertook the first comprehensive review of archaeological ages across Australia and used them as a proxy for exploring human activity in the Pleistocene. It was a pioneering paper, building on the preliminary application of these techniques in Australia by Bird and Frankel (1991), and with several similar studies to follow (e.g. Holdaway and Porch 1996; Lourandos and David 1998; Ulm and Hall 1996). The last few years has witnessed increasing use of radiocarbon data as a mainstream proxy with which to explore archaeological trends, facilitated by the increasing publication of large datasets and the availability of calibration and statistical software such as Oxcal, Calpal and R (e.g. Buchanan et al. 2008, 2011; Collard et al. 2010a, 2010b; Peros et al. 2010). In Australia, these advances have not gone unnoticed and, as part of recent research, we have now compiled an archaeological age dataset for Australia. Here, we present the complete Australian dataset and undertake a brief review of its composition, strengths and weaknesses. databaseAustraliaRadiocarbon DatingOptically Stimulated LuminescenceThermoluminescence DatingOxidisable CarbonUranium-SeriesElectron Spin ResonanceCation Ratio DatingAmino Acid Racemizationarchaeology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alan N. Williams
Sean Ulm
Mike Smith
Jill Reid
spellingShingle Alan N. Williams
Sean Ulm
Mike Smith
Jill Reid
AustArch: A Database of 14C and Non-14C Ages from Archaeological Sites in Australia - Composition, Compilation and Review (Data Paper)
Internet Archaeology
database
Australia
Radiocarbon Dating
Optically Stimulated Luminescence
Thermoluminescence Dating
Oxidisable Carbon
Uranium-Series
Electron Spin Resonance
Cation Ratio Dating
Amino Acid Racemization
archaeology
author_facet Alan N. Williams
Sean Ulm
Mike Smith
Jill Reid
author_sort Alan N. Williams
title AustArch: A Database of 14C and Non-14C Ages from Archaeological Sites in Australia - Composition, Compilation and Review (Data Paper)
title_short AustArch: A Database of 14C and Non-14C Ages from Archaeological Sites in Australia - Composition, Compilation and Review (Data Paper)
title_full AustArch: A Database of 14C and Non-14C Ages from Archaeological Sites in Australia - Composition, Compilation and Review (Data Paper)
title_fullStr AustArch: A Database of 14C and Non-14C Ages from Archaeological Sites in Australia - Composition, Compilation and Review (Data Paper)
title_full_unstemmed AustArch: A Database of 14C and Non-14C Ages from Archaeological Sites in Australia - Composition, Compilation and Review (Data Paper)
title_sort austarch: a database of 14c and non-14c ages from archaeological sites in australia - composition, compilation and review (data paper)
publisher University of York
series Internet Archaeology
issn 1363-5387
publishDate 2014-06-01
description It has been 20 years since Smith and Sharp (1993) undertook the first comprehensive review of archaeological ages across Australia and used them as a proxy for exploring human activity in the Pleistocene. It was a pioneering paper, building on the preliminary application of these techniques in Australia by Bird and Frankel (1991), and with several similar studies to follow (e.g. Holdaway and Porch 1996; Lourandos and David 1998; Ulm and Hall 1996). The last few years has witnessed increasing use of radiocarbon data as a mainstream proxy with which to explore archaeological trends, facilitated by the increasing publication of large datasets and the availability of calibration and statistical software such as Oxcal, Calpal and R (e.g. Buchanan et al. 2008, 2011; Collard et al. 2010a, 2010b; Peros et al. 2010). In Australia, these advances have not gone unnoticed and, as part of recent research, we have now compiled an archaeological age dataset for Australia. Here, we present the complete Australian dataset and undertake a brief review of its composition, strengths and weaknesses.
topic database
Australia
Radiocarbon Dating
Optically Stimulated Luminescence
Thermoluminescence Dating
Oxidisable Carbon
Uranium-Series
Electron Spin Resonance
Cation Ratio Dating
Amino Acid Racemization
archaeology
work_keys_str_mv AT alannwilliams austarchadatabaseof14candnon14cagesfromarchaeologicalsitesinaustraliacompositioncompilationandreviewdatapaper
AT seanulm austarchadatabaseof14candnon14cagesfromarchaeologicalsitesinaustraliacompositioncompilationandreviewdatapaper
AT mikesmith austarchadatabaseof14candnon14cagesfromarchaeologicalsitesinaustraliacompositioncompilationandreviewdatapaper
AT jillreid austarchadatabaseof14candnon14cagesfromarchaeologicalsitesinaustraliacompositioncompilationandreviewdatapaper
_version_ 1725721586391056384