A Comparative UAV Forensic Analysis: Static and Live Digital Evidence Traceability Challenges

The raising accessibility of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), colloquially known as drones, is rapidly increasing. Recent studies have discussed challenges that may come in tow with the growing use of this technology. These studies note that in-depth examination is required, especially when addressi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fahad E. Salamh, Umit Karabiyik, Marcus K. Rogers, Eric T. Matson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-05-01
Series:Drones
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2504-446X/5/2/42
id doaj-41e78128f24e458e8596eb2383636322
record_format Article
spelling doaj-41e78128f24e458e8596eb23836363222021-06-01T00:46:30ZengMDPI AGDrones2504-446X2021-05-015424210.3390/drones5020042A Comparative UAV Forensic Analysis: Static and Live Digital Evidence Traceability ChallengesFahad E. Salamh0Umit Karabiyik1Marcus K. Rogers2Eric T. Matson3Department of Computer and Information Technology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USADepartment of Computer and Information Technology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USADepartment of Computer and Information Technology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USADepartment of Computer and Information Technology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USAThe raising accessibility of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), colloquially known as drones, is rapidly increasing. Recent studies have discussed challenges that may come in tow with the growing use of this technology. These studies note that in-depth examination is required, especially when addressing challenges that carry a high volume of software data between sensors, actuators, and control commands. This work underlines static and live digital evidence traceability challenges to further enhance the UAV incident response plan. To study the live UAV forensic traceability issues, we apply the ‘purple-teaming’ exercise on small UAVs while conducting UAV forensic examination to determine technical challenges related to data integrity and repeatability. In addition, this research highlights current static technical challenges that could pose more challenges in justifying the discovered digital evidence. Additionally, this study discusses potential drone anti-forensic techniques and their association with the type of use, environment, attack vector, and level of expertise. To this end, we propose the UAV Kill Chain and categorize the impact and complexity of all highlighted challenges based on the conducted examination and the presented scientific contribution in this work. To the best of our knowledge, there has not been any contribution that incorporates ‘Purple-Teaming’ tactics to evaluate UAV-related research in cybersecurity and digital forensics. This work also proposes a categorization model that classifies the discovered UAV static and live digital evidence challenges based on their complexity and impact levels.https://www.mdpi.com/2504-446X/5/2/42UAV forensicKill Chaindigital evidence traceabilitydata integritytechnical issuescomparative model
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fahad E. Salamh
Umit Karabiyik
Marcus K. Rogers
Eric T. Matson
spellingShingle Fahad E. Salamh
Umit Karabiyik
Marcus K. Rogers
Eric T. Matson
A Comparative UAV Forensic Analysis: Static and Live Digital Evidence Traceability Challenges
Drones
UAV forensic
Kill Chain
digital evidence traceability
data integrity
technical issues
comparative model
author_facet Fahad E. Salamh
Umit Karabiyik
Marcus K. Rogers
Eric T. Matson
author_sort Fahad E. Salamh
title A Comparative UAV Forensic Analysis: Static and Live Digital Evidence Traceability Challenges
title_short A Comparative UAV Forensic Analysis: Static and Live Digital Evidence Traceability Challenges
title_full A Comparative UAV Forensic Analysis: Static and Live Digital Evidence Traceability Challenges
title_fullStr A Comparative UAV Forensic Analysis: Static and Live Digital Evidence Traceability Challenges
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative UAV Forensic Analysis: Static and Live Digital Evidence Traceability Challenges
title_sort comparative uav forensic analysis: static and live digital evidence traceability challenges
publisher MDPI AG
series Drones
issn 2504-446X
publishDate 2021-05-01
description The raising accessibility of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), colloquially known as drones, is rapidly increasing. Recent studies have discussed challenges that may come in tow with the growing use of this technology. These studies note that in-depth examination is required, especially when addressing challenges that carry a high volume of software data between sensors, actuators, and control commands. This work underlines static and live digital evidence traceability challenges to further enhance the UAV incident response plan. To study the live UAV forensic traceability issues, we apply the ‘purple-teaming’ exercise on small UAVs while conducting UAV forensic examination to determine technical challenges related to data integrity and repeatability. In addition, this research highlights current static technical challenges that could pose more challenges in justifying the discovered digital evidence. Additionally, this study discusses potential drone anti-forensic techniques and their association with the type of use, environment, attack vector, and level of expertise. To this end, we propose the UAV Kill Chain and categorize the impact and complexity of all highlighted challenges based on the conducted examination and the presented scientific contribution in this work. To the best of our knowledge, there has not been any contribution that incorporates ‘Purple-Teaming’ tactics to evaluate UAV-related research in cybersecurity and digital forensics. This work also proposes a categorization model that classifies the discovered UAV static and live digital evidence challenges based on their complexity and impact levels.
topic UAV forensic
Kill Chain
digital evidence traceability
data integrity
technical issues
comparative model
url https://www.mdpi.com/2504-446X/5/2/42
work_keys_str_mv AT fahadesalamh acomparativeuavforensicanalysisstaticandlivedigitalevidencetraceabilitychallenges
AT umitkarabiyik acomparativeuavforensicanalysisstaticandlivedigitalevidencetraceabilitychallenges
AT marcuskrogers acomparativeuavforensicanalysisstaticandlivedigitalevidencetraceabilitychallenges
AT erictmatson acomparativeuavforensicanalysisstaticandlivedigitalevidencetraceabilitychallenges
AT fahadesalamh comparativeuavforensicanalysisstaticandlivedigitalevidencetraceabilitychallenges
AT umitkarabiyik comparativeuavforensicanalysisstaticandlivedigitalevidencetraceabilitychallenges
AT marcuskrogers comparativeuavforensicanalysisstaticandlivedigitalevidencetraceabilitychallenges
AT erictmatson comparativeuavforensicanalysisstaticandlivedigitalevidencetraceabilitychallenges
_version_ 1721413851928330240