THE INTERVENING EFFECTS OF PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS AND INTERPERSONAL TRUST ON THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN MULTIPLE MEASURES-BASED PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND MANAGERS' JOB SATISFACTION

Criticisms directed at the use of financial measures alone for performance evaluation have led to much interest in the use of nonfinancial performance measures to balance the financial measures. Hence, much recent research has been directed to investigate the effectiveness sand behavioral consequenc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mahfud Sholihin, Chong M. Lau
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Gadjah Mada 2003-08-01
Series:Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb/article/view/5632
id doaj-41cf95d781ea452c98f64c83ed911925
record_format Article
spelling doaj-41cf95d781ea452c98f64c83ed9119252020-11-24T22:02:22ZengUniversitas Gadjah MadaGadjah Mada International Journal of Business1411-11282338-72382003-08-015332134310.22146/gamaijb.56324958THE INTERVENING EFFECTS OF PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS AND INTERPERSONAL TRUST ON THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN MULTIPLE MEASURES-BASED PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND MANAGERS' JOB SATISFACTIONMahfud Sholihin0Chong M. Lau1Faculty of Economics & Business, Universitas Gadjah MadaUniversity of Western AustraliaCriticisms directed at the use of financial measures alone for performance evaluation have led to much interest in the use of nonfinancial performance measures to balance the financial measures. Hence, much recent research has been directed to investigate the effectiveness sand behavioral consequences of a mix of financial and nonfinancial measures (e.g. the Balanced Scorecard approach) in contemporary settings. However, there is evidence from prior studies to suggest that the manner or how performance measures are used may affect the subordinates' behavior and work-related attitudes indirectly through the subordinates' perception of the justness of these measures and the interpersonal trust these measures promote. There is also evidence to indicate that it is the extent of the subordinates' agreement with the performance measures used in the evaluation, rather than the measures per se, which affects their behavior and work-related attitudes. Subordinates are more likely to agree with performance measures which they regard as fair and which enhance their trust in their superiors. This study therefore investigates if the effects of a mix of financial and nonfinancial measures (such as those used in the Balanced Scorecard approach) on subordinates' job satisfaction are indirect through the subordinates' perception of the greater extent of fairness (justness) in the evaluation process and the greater extent of trust such a mix of measures promotes. The results, based on a sample of 70 managers, support the expectation that a mix of financial and nonfinancial has no direct effect on subordinates’ job satisfaction. Instead, the effects of such a mix of performance measures on subordinates’ job satisfaction are indirect through the enhancement of the subordinates’ favorable perceptions of procedural fairness and interpersonal trust.https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb/article/view/5632interpersonal trustjob satisfactionmultiple measures-based performance evaluationprocedural fairness
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mahfud Sholihin
Chong M. Lau
spellingShingle Mahfud Sholihin
Chong M. Lau
THE INTERVENING EFFECTS OF PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS AND INTERPERSONAL TRUST ON THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN MULTIPLE MEASURES-BASED PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND MANAGERS' JOB SATISFACTION
Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business
interpersonal trust
job satisfaction
multiple measures-based performance evaluation
procedural fairness
author_facet Mahfud Sholihin
Chong M. Lau
author_sort Mahfud Sholihin
title THE INTERVENING EFFECTS OF PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS AND INTERPERSONAL TRUST ON THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN MULTIPLE MEASURES-BASED PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND MANAGERS' JOB SATISFACTION
title_short THE INTERVENING EFFECTS OF PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS AND INTERPERSONAL TRUST ON THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN MULTIPLE MEASURES-BASED PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND MANAGERS' JOB SATISFACTION
title_full THE INTERVENING EFFECTS OF PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS AND INTERPERSONAL TRUST ON THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN MULTIPLE MEASURES-BASED PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND MANAGERS' JOB SATISFACTION
title_fullStr THE INTERVENING EFFECTS OF PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS AND INTERPERSONAL TRUST ON THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN MULTIPLE MEASURES-BASED PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND MANAGERS' JOB SATISFACTION
title_full_unstemmed THE INTERVENING EFFECTS OF PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS AND INTERPERSONAL TRUST ON THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN MULTIPLE MEASURES-BASED PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND MANAGERS' JOB SATISFACTION
title_sort intervening effects of procedural fairness and interpersonal trust on the relationships between multiple measures-based performance evaluation and managers' job satisfaction
publisher Universitas Gadjah Mada
series Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business
issn 1411-1128
2338-7238
publishDate 2003-08-01
description Criticisms directed at the use of financial measures alone for performance evaluation have led to much interest in the use of nonfinancial performance measures to balance the financial measures. Hence, much recent research has been directed to investigate the effectiveness sand behavioral consequences of a mix of financial and nonfinancial measures (e.g. the Balanced Scorecard approach) in contemporary settings. However, there is evidence from prior studies to suggest that the manner or how performance measures are used may affect the subordinates' behavior and work-related attitudes indirectly through the subordinates' perception of the justness of these measures and the interpersonal trust these measures promote. There is also evidence to indicate that it is the extent of the subordinates' agreement with the performance measures used in the evaluation, rather than the measures per se, which affects their behavior and work-related attitudes. Subordinates are more likely to agree with performance measures which they regard as fair and which enhance their trust in their superiors. This study therefore investigates if the effects of a mix of financial and nonfinancial measures (such as those used in the Balanced Scorecard approach) on subordinates' job satisfaction are indirect through the subordinates' perception of the greater extent of fairness (justness) in the evaluation process and the greater extent of trust such a mix of measures promotes. The results, based on a sample of 70 managers, support the expectation that a mix of financial and nonfinancial has no direct effect on subordinates’ job satisfaction. Instead, the effects of such a mix of performance measures on subordinates’ job satisfaction are indirect through the enhancement of the subordinates’ favorable perceptions of procedural fairness and interpersonal trust.
topic interpersonal trust
job satisfaction
multiple measures-based performance evaluation
procedural fairness
url https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb/article/view/5632
work_keys_str_mv AT mahfudsholihin theinterveningeffectsofproceduralfairnessandinterpersonaltrustontherelationshipsbetweenmultiplemeasuresbasedperformanceevaluationandmanagersjobsatisfaction
AT chongmlau theinterveningeffectsofproceduralfairnessandinterpersonaltrustontherelationshipsbetweenmultiplemeasuresbasedperformanceevaluationandmanagersjobsatisfaction
AT mahfudsholihin interveningeffectsofproceduralfairnessandinterpersonaltrustontherelationshipsbetweenmultiplemeasuresbasedperformanceevaluationandmanagersjobsatisfaction
AT chongmlau interveningeffectsofproceduralfairnessandinterpersonaltrustontherelationshipsbetweenmultiplemeasuresbasedperformanceevaluationandmanagersjobsatisfaction
_version_ 1725836251826749440