Quantifying Success in Science: An Overview

Quantifying success in science plays a key role in guiding funding allocations, recruitment decisions, and rewards. Recently, a significant amount of progresses have been made towards quantifying success in science. This lack of detailed analysis and summary continues a practical issue. The literatu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiaomei Bai, Hanxiao Pan, Jie Hou, Teng Guo, Ivan Lee, Feng Xia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IEEE 2020-01-01
Series:IEEE Access
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9134748/
id doaj-41c32c28328d4b5183f22603c2e6657c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-41c32c28328d4b5183f22603c2e6657c2021-03-30T02:17:58ZengIEEEIEEE Access2169-35362020-01-01812320012321410.1109/ACCESS.2020.30077099134748Quantifying Success in Science: An OverviewXiaomei Bai0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9826-4802Hanxiao Pan1Jie Hou2Teng Guo3Ivan Lee4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2826-6367Feng Xia5https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8324-1859Computing Center, Anshan Normal University, Anshan, ChinaSchool of Software, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, ChinaSchool of Software, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, ChinaSchool of Software, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, ChinaSTEM, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, AustraliaSchool of Engineering, IT and Physical Sciences, Federation University Australia, Ballarat, VIC, AustraliaQuantifying success in science plays a key role in guiding funding allocations, recruitment decisions, and rewards. Recently, a significant amount of progresses have been made towards quantifying success in science. This lack of detailed analysis and summary continues a practical issue. The literature reports the factors influencing scholarly impact and evaluation methods and indices aimed at overcoming this crucial weakness. We focus on categorizing and reviewing the current development on evaluation indices of scholarly impact, including paper impact, scholar impact, and journal impact. Besides, we summarize the issues of existing evaluation methods and indices, investigate the open issues and challenges, and provide possible solutions, including the pattern of collaboration impact, unified evaluation standards, implicit success factor mining, dynamic academic network embedding, and scholarly impact inflation. This paper should help the researchers obtaining a broader understanding of quantifying success in science, and identifying some potential research directions.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9134748/Success in sciencescholarly impactevaluation indices
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xiaomei Bai
Hanxiao Pan
Jie Hou
Teng Guo
Ivan Lee
Feng Xia
spellingShingle Xiaomei Bai
Hanxiao Pan
Jie Hou
Teng Guo
Ivan Lee
Feng Xia
Quantifying Success in Science: An Overview
IEEE Access
Success in science
scholarly impact
evaluation indices
author_facet Xiaomei Bai
Hanxiao Pan
Jie Hou
Teng Guo
Ivan Lee
Feng Xia
author_sort Xiaomei Bai
title Quantifying Success in Science: An Overview
title_short Quantifying Success in Science: An Overview
title_full Quantifying Success in Science: An Overview
title_fullStr Quantifying Success in Science: An Overview
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying Success in Science: An Overview
title_sort quantifying success in science: an overview
publisher IEEE
series IEEE Access
issn 2169-3536
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Quantifying success in science plays a key role in guiding funding allocations, recruitment decisions, and rewards. Recently, a significant amount of progresses have been made towards quantifying success in science. This lack of detailed analysis and summary continues a practical issue. The literature reports the factors influencing scholarly impact and evaluation methods and indices aimed at overcoming this crucial weakness. We focus on categorizing and reviewing the current development on evaluation indices of scholarly impact, including paper impact, scholar impact, and journal impact. Besides, we summarize the issues of existing evaluation methods and indices, investigate the open issues and challenges, and provide possible solutions, including the pattern of collaboration impact, unified evaluation standards, implicit success factor mining, dynamic academic network embedding, and scholarly impact inflation. This paper should help the researchers obtaining a broader understanding of quantifying success in science, and identifying some potential research directions.
topic Success in science
scholarly impact
evaluation indices
url https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9134748/
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaomeibai quantifyingsuccessinscienceanoverview
AT hanxiaopan quantifyingsuccessinscienceanoverview
AT jiehou quantifyingsuccessinscienceanoverview
AT tengguo quantifyingsuccessinscienceanoverview
AT ivanlee quantifyingsuccessinscienceanoverview
AT fengxia quantifyingsuccessinscienceanoverview
_version_ 1724185394372673536