Quantifying Success in Science: An Overview
Quantifying success in science plays a key role in guiding funding allocations, recruitment decisions, and rewards. Recently, a significant amount of progresses have been made towards quantifying success in science. This lack of detailed analysis and summary continues a practical issue. The literatu...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
IEEE
2020-01-01
|
Series: | IEEE Access |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9134748/ |
id |
doaj-41c32c28328d4b5183f22603c2e6657c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-41c32c28328d4b5183f22603c2e6657c2021-03-30T02:17:58ZengIEEEIEEE Access2169-35362020-01-01812320012321410.1109/ACCESS.2020.30077099134748Quantifying Success in Science: An OverviewXiaomei Bai0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9826-4802Hanxiao Pan1Jie Hou2Teng Guo3Ivan Lee4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2826-6367Feng Xia5https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8324-1859Computing Center, Anshan Normal University, Anshan, ChinaSchool of Software, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, ChinaSchool of Software, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, ChinaSchool of Software, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, ChinaSTEM, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, AustraliaSchool of Engineering, IT and Physical Sciences, Federation University Australia, Ballarat, VIC, AustraliaQuantifying success in science plays a key role in guiding funding allocations, recruitment decisions, and rewards. Recently, a significant amount of progresses have been made towards quantifying success in science. This lack of detailed analysis and summary continues a practical issue. The literature reports the factors influencing scholarly impact and evaluation methods and indices aimed at overcoming this crucial weakness. We focus on categorizing and reviewing the current development on evaluation indices of scholarly impact, including paper impact, scholar impact, and journal impact. Besides, we summarize the issues of existing evaluation methods and indices, investigate the open issues and challenges, and provide possible solutions, including the pattern of collaboration impact, unified evaluation standards, implicit success factor mining, dynamic academic network embedding, and scholarly impact inflation. This paper should help the researchers obtaining a broader understanding of quantifying success in science, and identifying some potential research directions.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9134748/Success in sciencescholarly impactevaluation indices |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Xiaomei Bai Hanxiao Pan Jie Hou Teng Guo Ivan Lee Feng Xia |
spellingShingle |
Xiaomei Bai Hanxiao Pan Jie Hou Teng Guo Ivan Lee Feng Xia Quantifying Success in Science: An Overview IEEE Access Success in science scholarly impact evaluation indices |
author_facet |
Xiaomei Bai Hanxiao Pan Jie Hou Teng Guo Ivan Lee Feng Xia |
author_sort |
Xiaomei Bai |
title |
Quantifying Success in Science: An Overview |
title_short |
Quantifying Success in Science: An Overview |
title_full |
Quantifying Success in Science: An Overview |
title_fullStr |
Quantifying Success in Science: An Overview |
title_full_unstemmed |
Quantifying Success in Science: An Overview |
title_sort |
quantifying success in science: an overview |
publisher |
IEEE |
series |
IEEE Access |
issn |
2169-3536 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
Quantifying success in science plays a key role in guiding funding allocations, recruitment decisions, and rewards. Recently, a significant amount of progresses have been made towards quantifying success in science. This lack of detailed analysis and summary continues a practical issue. The literature reports the factors influencing scholarly impact and evaluation methods and indices aimed at overcoming this crucial weakness. We focus on categorizing and reviewing the current development on evaluation indices of scholarly impact, including paper impact, scholar impact, and journal impact. Besides, we summarize the issues of existing evaluation methods and indices, investigate the open issues and challenges, and provide possible solutions, including the pattern of collaboration impact, unified evaluation standards, implicit success factor mining, dynamic academic network embedding, and scholarly impact inflation. This paper should help the researchers obtaining a broader understanding of quantifying success in science, and identifying some potential research directions. |
topic |
Success in science scholarly impact evaluation indices |
url |
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9134748/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT xiaomeibai quantifyingsuccessinscienceanoverview AT hanxiaopan quantifyingsuccessinscienceanoverview AT jiehou quantifyingsuccessinscienceanoverview AT tengguo quantifyingsuccessinscienceanoverview AT ivanlee quantifyingsuccessinscienceanoverview AT fengxia quantifyingsuccessinscienceanoverview |
_version_ |
1724185394372673536 |