A Cultural Evolution Model for Trend Changes in the American Secular Cycle
Rising economic inequality in the United States has become a topic of political interest in recent years. Inequality appears to show cycles corresponding to secular cycles, suggesting the possibility of declining inequality in the future. The most recent episode of declining inequality in America is...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
eScholarship Publishing, University of California
2019-06-01
|
Series: | Cliodynamics |
Online Access: | https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9x36913k |
id |
doaj-41c30061ebb54e86a8e3b8931f895903 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-41c30061ebb54e86a8e3b8931f8959032020-11-25T01:40:07ZengeScholarship Publishing, University of CaliforniaCliodynamics2373-75302373-75302019-06-0110113010.21237/C7clio10141084A Cultural Evolution Model for Trend Changes in the American Secular CycleMichael Allen AlexanderRising economic inequality in the United States has become a topic of political interest in recent years. Inequality appears to show cycles corresponding to secular cycles, suggesting the possibility of declining inequality in the future. The most recent episode of declining inequality in America is known as the Great Compression. It occurred in the middle of the 20th century. This paper uses the guided variation cultural evolution model (Boyd and Richerson 1985:95-7) to explain shifting trends in inequality in five nations. According to this analysis, the Great Compression was largely due to a shift in the business environment reflecting tax and other economic policy implemented over the 1914-45 era. The cultural evolutionary response to this environmental change was to replace “shareholder primacy” cultural variants with “stakeholder capitalism” variants which resulted in lower inequality. Half a century later, new policy, implemented in response to the great inflation following the collapse of the Bretton Woods system, changed the business environment again in ways that favored shareholder primacy cultural variants and rising inequality. The extent to which this occurred depended on the degree to which stakeholder capitalism was integrated into institutions.https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9x36913k |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Michael Allen Alexander |
spellingShingle |
Michael Allen Alexander A Cultural Evolution Model for Trend Changes in the American Secular Cycle Cliodynamics |
author_facet |
Michael Allen Alexander |
author_sort |
Michael Allen Alexander |
title |
A Cultural Evolution Model for Trend Changes in the American Secular Cycle |
title_short |
A Cultural Evolution Model for Trend Changes in the American Secular Cycle |
title_full |
A Cultural Evolution Model for Trend Changes in the American Secular Cycle |
title_fullStr |
A Cultural Evolution Model for Trend Changes in the American Secular Cycle |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Cultural Evolution Model for Trend Changes in the American Secular Cycle |
title_sort |
cultural evolution model for trend changes in the american secular cycle |
publisher |
eScholarship Publishing, University of California |
series |
Cliodynamics |
issn |
2373-7530 2373-7530 |
publishDate |
2019-06-01 |
description |
Rising economic inequality in the United States has become a topic of political interest in recent years. Inequality appears to show cycles corresponding to secular cycles, suggesting the possibility of declining inequality in the future. The most recent episode of declining inequality in America is known as the Great Compression. It occurred in the middle of the 20th century. This paper uses the guided variation cultural evolution model (Boyd and Richerson 1985:95-7) to explain shifting trends in inequality in five nations. According to this analysis, the Great Compression was largely due to a shift in the business environment reflecting tax and other economic policy implemented over the 1914-45 era. The cultural evolutionary response to this environmental change was to replace “shareholder primacy” cultural variants with “stakeholder capitalism” variants which resulted in lower inequality. Half a century later, new policy, implemented in response to the great inflation following the collapse of the Bretton Woods system, changed the business environment again in ways that favored shareholder primacy cultural variants and rising inequality. The extent to which this occurred depended on the degree to which stakeholder capitalism was integrated into institutions. |
url |
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9x36913k |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT michaelallenalexander aculturalevolutionmodelfortrendchangesintheamericansecularcycle AT michaelallenalexander culturalevolutionmodelfortrendchangesintheamericansecularcycle |
_version_ |
1725047028892827648 |