The socioeconomic performance of small and mediumsized industrial towns: Slovenian perspectives

The socioeconomic performance of industrial small and medium-sized towns (SMSTs) in comparison to that of non-industrial SMSTs, is subject to evaluation in this paper, to see if the presence of industry has adverse effects on socioeconomic factors. We studied 32 variables accounting for dimensions o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bole David, Kozina Jani, Tiran Jernej
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2020-03-01
Series:Moravian Geographical Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2020-0002
id doaj-41bce0ac7a0f432e9fb296624bdfb390
record_format Article
spelling doaj-41bce0ac7a0f432e9fb296624bdfb3902021-09-06T19:22:28ZengSciendoMoravian Geographical Reports2199-62022020-03-01281162810.2478/mgr-2020-0002mgr-2020-0002The socioeconomic performance of small and mediumsized industrial towns: Slovenian perspectivesBole David0Kozina Jani1Tiran Jernej2Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Anton Melik Geographical Institute,Ljubljana, SloveniaResearch Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Anton Melik Geographical Institute,Ljubljana, SloveniaResearch Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Anton Melik Geographical Institute,Ljubljana, SloveniaThe socioeconomic performance of industrial small and medium-sized towns (SMSTs) in comparison to that of non-industrial SMSTs, is subject to evaluation in this paper, to see if the presence of industry has adverse effects on socioeconomic factors. We studied 32 variables accounting for dimensions of socioeconomic performance in Slovenian SMSTs and conducted various statistical tests. We found only minor differences between the two groups, pertaining mainly to some elements of economic structure and demography, and some mixed relations of industrial employment and socioeconomic performance. The results demonstrate that industrial SMSTs should not be labelled automatically as ‘disadvantaged’. We discuss why our results differ from general research expectations in the literature: in the local context, we outline the “egalitarian syndrome” and policies of polycentric spatial development; in the global context, we discuss the “failed tertiarisation effect” and the differences between post-socialist and “Western” countries. We conclude by proposing that research should be re-oriented towards the more place-sensitive issues of industrial towns across Europe.https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2020-0002small and medium-sized townsindustrysocioeconomic developmentpost-socialismtertiarisation effectslovenia
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bole David
Kozina Jani
Tiran Jernej
spellingShingle Bole David
Kozina Jani
Tiran Jernej
The socioeconomic performance of small and mediumsized industrial towns: Slovenian perspectives
Moravian Geographical Reports
small and medium-sized towns
industry
socioeconomic development
post-socialism
tertiarisation effect
slovenia
author_facet Bole David
Kozina Jani
Tiran Jernej
author_sort Bole David
title The socioeconomic performance of small and mediumsized industrial towns: Slovenian perspectives
title_short The socioeconomic performance of small and mediumsized industrial towns: Slovenian perspectives
title_full The socioeconomic performance of small and mediumsized industrial towns: Slovenian perspectives
title_fullStr The socioeconomic performance of small and mediumsized industrial towns: Slovenian perspectives
title_full_unstemmed The socioeconomic performance of small and mediumsized industrial towns: Slovenian perspectives
title_sort socioeconomic performance of small and mediumsized industrial towns: slovenian perspectives
publisher Sciendo
series Moravian Geographical Reports
issn 2199-6202
publishDate 2020-03-01
description The socioeconomic performance of industrial small and medium-sized towns (SMSTs) in comparison to that of non-industrial SMSTs, is subject to evaluation in this paper, to see if the presence of industry has adverse effects on socioeconomic factors. We studied 32 variables accounting for dimensions of socioeconomic performance in Slovenian SMSTs and conducted various statistical tests. We found only minor differences between the two groups, pertaining mainly to some elements of economic structure and demography, and some mixed relations of industrial employment and socioeconomic performance. The results demonstrate that industrial SMSTs should not be labelled automatically as ‘disadvantaged’. We discuss why our results differ from general research expectations in the literature: in the local context, we outline the “egalitarian syndrome” and policies of polycentric spatial development; in the global context, we discuss the “failed tertiarisation effect” and the differences between post-socialist and “Western” countries. We conclude by proposing that research should be re-oriented towards the more place-sensitive issues of industrial towns across Europe.
topic small and medium-sized towns
industry
socioeconomic development
post-socialism
tertiarisation effect
slovenia
url https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2020-0002
work_keys_str_mv AT boledavid thesocioeconomicperformanceofsmallandmediumsizedindustrialtownsslovenianperspectives
AT kozinajani thesocioeconomicperformanceofsmallandmediumsizedindustrialtownsslovenianperspectives
AT tiranjernej thesocioeconomicperformanceofsmallandmediumsizedindustrialtownsslovenianperspectives
AT boledavid socioeconomicperformanceofsmallandmediumsizedindustrialtownsslovenianperspectives
AT kozinajani socioeconomicperformanceofsmallandmediumsizedindustrialtownsslovenianperspectives
AT tiranjernej socioeconomicperformanceofsmallandmediumsizedindustrialtownsslovenianperspectives
_version_ 1717772007696760832