The socioeconomic performance of small and mediumsized industrial towns: Slovenian perspectives
The socioeconomic performance of industrial small and medium-sized towns (SMSTs) in comparison to that of non-industrial SMSTs, is subject to evaluation in this paper, to see if the presence of industry has adverse effects on socioeconomic factors. We studied 32 variables accounting for dimensions o...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sciendo
2020-03-01
|
Series: | Moravian Geographical Reports |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2020-0002 |
id |
doaj-41bce0ac7a0f432e9fb296624bdfb390 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-41bce0ac7a0f432e9fb296624bdfb3902021-09-06T19:22:28ZengSciendoMoravian Geographical Reports2199-62022020-03-01281162810.2478/mgr-2020-0002mgr-2020-0002The socioeconomic performance of small and mediumsized industrial towns: Slovenian perspectivesBole David0Kozina Jani1Tiran Jernej2Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Anton Melik Geographical Institute,Ljubljana, SloveniaResearch Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Anton Melik Geographical Institute,Ljubljana, SloveniaResearch Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Anton Melik Geographical Institute,Ljubljana, SloveniaThe socioeconomic performance of industrial small and medium-sized towns (SMSTs) in comparison to that of non-industrial SMSTs, is subject to evaluation in this paper, to see if the presence of industry has adverse effects on socioeconomic factors. We studied 32 variables accounting for dimensions of socioeconomic performance in Slovenian SMSTs and conducted various statistical tests. We found only minor differences between the two groups, pertaining mainly to some elements of economic structure and demography, and some mixed relations of industrial employment and socioeconomic performance. The results demonstrate that industrial SMSTs should not be labelled automatically as ‘disadvantaged’. We discuss why our results differ from general research expectations in the literature: in the local context, we outline the “egalitarian syndrome” and policies of polycentric spatial development; in the global context, we discuss the “failed tertiarisation effect” and the differences between post-socialist and “Western” countries. We conclude by proposing that research should be re-oriented towards the more place-sensitive issues of industrial towns across Europe.https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2020-0002small and medium-sized townsindustrysocioeconomic developmentpost-socialismtertiarisation effectslovenia |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Bole David Kozina Jani Tiran Jernej |
spellingShingle |
Bole David Kozina Jani Tiran Jernej The socioeconomic performance of small and mediumsized industrial towns: Slovenian perspectives Moravian Geographical Reports small and medium-sized towns industry socioeconomic development post-socialism tertiarisation effect slovenia |
author_facet |
Bole David Kozina Jani Tiran Jernej |
author_sort |
Bole David |
title |
The socioeconomic performance of small and mediumsized industrial towns: Slovenian perspectives |
title_short |
The socioeconomic performance of small and mediumsized industrial towns: Slovenian perspectives |
title_full |
The socioeconomic performance of small and mediumsized industrial towns: Slovenian perspectives |
title_fullStr |
The socioeconomic performance of small and mediumsized industrial towns: Slovenian perspectives |
title_full_unstemmed |
The socioeconomic performance of small and mediumsized industrial towns: Slovenian perspectives |
title_sort |
socioeconomic performance of small and mediumsized industrial towns: slovenian perspectives |
publisher |
Sciendo |
series |
Moravian Geographical Reports |
issn |
2199-6202 |
publishDate |
2020-03-01 |
description |
The socioeconomic performance of industrial small and medium-sized towns (SMSTs) in comparison to that of non-industrial SMSTs, is subject to evaluation in this paper, to see if the presence of industry has adverse effects on socioeconomic factors. We studied 32 variables accounting for dimensions of socioeconomic performance in Slovenian SMSTs and conducted various statistical tests. We found only minor differences between the two groups, pertaining mainly to some elements of economic structure and demography, and some mixed relations of industrial employment and socioeconomic performance. The results demonstrate that industrial SMSTs should not be labelled automatically as ‘disadvantaged’. We discuss why our results differ from general research expectations in the literature: in the local context, we outline the “egalitarian syndrome” and policies of polycentric spatial development; in the global context, we discuss the “failed tertiarisation effect” and the differences between post-socialist and “Western” countries. We conclude by proposing that research should be re-oriented towards the more place-sensitive issues of industrial towns across Europe. |
topic |
small and medium-sized towns industry socioeconomic development post-socialism tertiarisation effect slovenia |
url |
https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2020-0002 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT boledavid thesocioeconomicperformanceofsmallandmediumsizedindustrialtownsslovenianperspectives AT kozinajani thesocioeconomicperformanceofsmallandmediumsizedindustrialtownsslovenianperspectives AT tiranjernej thesocioeconomicperformanceofsmallandmediumsizedindustrialtownsslovenianperspectives AT boledavid socioeconomicperformanceofsmallandmediumsizedindustrialtownsslovenianperspectives AT kozinajani socioeconomicperformanceofsmallandmediumsizedindustrialtownsslovenianperspectives AT tiranjernej socioeconomicperformanceofsmallandmediumsizedindustrialtownsslovenianperspectives |
_version_ |
1717772007696760832 |