Filtering of pulsed lidar data using spatial information and a clustering algorithm

<p>Wind lidars present advantages over meteorological masts, including simultaneous multipoint observations, flexibility in measuring geometry, and reduced installation cost. But wind lidars come with the “`cost” of increased complexity in terms of data quality and analysis. Carrier-to-noise r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: L. Alcayaga
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2020-11-01
Series:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Online Access:https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/6237/2020/amt-13-6237-2020.pdf
id doaj-41b64fc305e440d493fe70d646b4e525
record_format Article
spelling doaj-41b64fc305e440d493fe70d646b4e5252020-11-25T04:09:14ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Measurement Techniques1867-13811867-85482020-11-01136237625410.5194/amt-13-6237-2020Filtering of pulsed lidar data using spatial information and a clustering algorithmL. Alcayaga<p>Wind lidars present advantages over meteorological masts, including simultaneous multipoint observations, flexibility in measuring geometry, and reduced installation cost. But wind lidars come with the “`cost” of increased complexity in terms of data quality and analysis. Carrier-to-noise ratio (CNR) has been the metric most commonly used to recover reliable observations from lidar measurements but with severely reduced data recovery. In this work we apply a clustering technique to identify unreliable measurements from pulsed lidars scanning a horizontal plane, taking advantage of all data available from the lidars – not only CNR but also line-of-sight wind speed (<span class="inline-formula"><i>V</i><sub>LOS</sub></span>), spatial position, and <span class="inline-formula"><i>V</i><sub>LOS</sub></span> smoothness. The performance of this data filtering technique is evaluated in terms of data recovery and data quality against both a median-like filter and a pure CNR-threshold filter. The results show that the clustering filter is capable of recovering more reliable data in noisy regions of the scans, increasing the data recovery up to 38&thinsp;% and reducing by at least two-thirds the acceptance of unreliable measurements relative to the commonly used CNR threshold. Along with this, the need for user intervention in the setup of data filtering is reduced considerably, which is a step towards a more automated and robust filter.</p>https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/6237/2020/amt-13-6237-2020.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author L. Alcayaga
spellingShingle L. Alcayaga
Filtering of pulsed lidar data using spatial information and a clustering algorithm
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
author_facet L. Alcayaga
author_sort L. Alcayaga
title Filtering of pulsed lidar data using spatial information and a clustering algorithm
title_short Filtering of pulsed lidar data using spatial information and a clustering algorithm
title_full Filtering of pulsed lidar data using spatial information and a clustering algorithm
title_fullStr Filtering of pulsed lidar data using spatial information and a clustering algorithm
title_full_unstemmed Filtering of pulsed lidar data using spatial information and a clustering algorithm
title_sort filtering of pulsed lidar data using spatial information and a clustering algorithm
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
issn 1867-1381
1867-8548
publishDate 2020-11-01
description <p>Wind lidars present advantages over meteorological masts, including simultaneous multipoint observations, flexibility in measuring geometry, and reduced installation cost. But wind lidars come with the “`cost” of increased complexity in terms of data quality and analysis. Carrier-to-noise ratio (CNR) has been the metric most commonly used to recover reliable observations from lidar measurements but with severely reduced data recovery. In this work we apply a clustering technique to identify unreliable measurements from pulsed lidars scanning a horizontal plane, taking advantage of all data available from the lidars – not only CNR but also line-of-sight wind speed (<span class="inline-formula"><i>V</i><sub>LOS</sub></span>), spatial position, and <span class="inline-formula"><i>V</i><sub>LOS</sub></span> smoothness. The performance of this data filtering technique is evaluated in terms of data recovery and data quality against both a median-like filter and a pure CNR-threshold filter. The results show that the clustering filter is capable of recovering more reliable data in noisy regions of the scans, increasing the data recovery up to 38&thinsp;% and reducing by at least two-thirds the acceptance of unreliable measurements relative to the commonly used CNR threshold. Along with this, the need for user intervention in the setup of data filtering is reduced considerably, which is a step towards a more automated and robust filter.</p>
url https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/6237/2020/amt-13-6237-2020.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT lalcayaga filteringofpulsedlidardatausingspatialinformationandaclusteringalgorithm
_version_ 1724422704926294016