Modelling the evolution of transcription factor binding preferences in complex eukaryotes

Abstract Transcription factors (TFs) exert their regulatory action by binding to DNA with specific sequence preferences. However, different TFs can partially share their binding sequences due to their common evolutionary origin. This “redundancy” of binding defines a way of organizing TFs in “motif...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Antonio Rosanova, Alberto Colliva, Matteo Osella, Michele Caselle
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2017-08-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07761-0
id doaj-41a22669d12d43a38f9d2da0e52d2598
record_format Article
spelling doaj-41a22669d12d43a38f9d2da0e52d25982020-12-08T00:02:17ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222017-08-017111210.1038/s41598-017-07761-0Modelling the evolution of transcription factor binding preferences in complex eukaryotesAntonio Rosanova0Alberto Colliva1Matteo Osella2Michele Caselle3Department of Physics and INFN, Università degli Studi di TorinoDepartment of Physics and INFN, Università degli Studi di TorinoDepartment of Physics and INFN, Università degli Studi di TorinoDepartment of Physics and INFN, Università degli Studi di TorinoAbstract Transcription factors (TFs) exert their regulatory action by binding to DNA with specific sequence preferences. However, different TFs can partially share their binding sequences due to their common evolutionary origin. This “redundancy” of binding defines a way of organizing TFs in “motif families” by grouping TFs with similar binding preferences. Since these ultimately define the TF target genes, the motif family organization entails information about the structure of transcriptional regulation as it has been shaped by evolution. Focusing on the human TF repertoire, we show that a one-parameter evolutionary model of the Birth-Death-Innovation type can explain the TF empirical repartition in motif families, and allows to highlight the relevant evolutionary forces at the origin of this organization. Moreover, the model allows to pinpoint few deviations from the neutral scenario it assumes: three over-expanded families (including HOX and FOX genes), a set of “singleton” TFs for which duplication seems to be selected against, and a higher-than-average rate of diversification of the binding preferences of TFs with a Zinc Finger DNA binding domain. Finally, a comparison of the TF motif family organization in different eukaryotic species suggests an increase of redundancy of binding with organism complexity.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07761-0
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Antonio Rosanova
Alberto Colliva
Matteo Osella
Michele Caselle
spellingShingle Antonio Rosanova
Alberto Colliva
Matteo Osella
Michele Caselle
Modelling the evolution of transcription factor binding preferences in complex eukaryotes
Scientific Reports
author_facet Antonio Rosanova
Alberto Colliva
Matteo Osella
Michele Caselle
author_sort Antonio Rosanova
title Modelling the evolution of transcription factor binding preferences in complex eukaryotes
title_short Modelling the evolution of transcription factor binding preferences in complex eukaryotes
title_full Modelling the evolution of transcription factor binding preferences in complex eukaryotes
title_fullStr Modelling the evolution of transcription factor binding preferences in complex eukaryotes
title_full_unstemmed Modelling the evolution of transcription factor binding preferences in complex eukaryotes
title_sort modelling the evolution of transcription factor binding preferences in complex eukaryotes
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2017-08-01
description Abstract Transcription factors (TFs) exert their regulatory action by binding to DNA with specific sequence preferences. However, different TFs can partially share their binding sequences due to their common evolutionary origin. This “redundancy” of binding defines a way of organizing TFs in “motif families” by grouping TFs with similar binding preferences. Since these ultimately define the TF target genes, the motif family organization entails information about the structure of transcriptional regulation as it has been shaped by evolution. Focusing on the human TF repertoire, we show that a one-parameter evolutionary model of the Birth-Death-Innovation type can explain the TF empirical repartition in motif families, and allows to highlight the relevant evolutionary forces at the origin of this organization. Moreover, the model allows to pinpoint few deviations from the neutral scenario it assumes: three over-expanded families (including HOX and FOX genes), a set of “singleton” TFs for which duplication seems to be selected against, and a higher-than-average rate of diversification of the binding preferences of TFs with a Zinc Finger DNA binding domain. Finally, a comparison of the TF motif family organization in different eukaryotic species suggests an increase of redundancy of binding with organism complexity.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07761-0
work_keys_str_mv AT antoniorosanova modellingtheevolutionoftranscriptionfactorbindingpreferencesincomplexeukaryotes
AT albertocolliva modellingtheevolutionoftranscriptionfactorbindingpreferencesincomplexeukaryotes
AT matteoosella modellingtheevolutionoftranscriptionfactorbindingpreferencesincomplexeukaryotes
AT michelecaselle modellingtheevolutionoftranscriptionfactorbindingpreferencesincomplexeukaryotes
_version_ 1724396913716887552