Modelling the evolution of transcription factor binding preferences in complex eukaryotes
Abstract Transcription factors (TFs) exert their regulatory action by binding to DNA with specific sequence preferences. However, different TFs can partially share their binding sequences due to their common evolutionary origin. This “redundancy” of binding defines a way of organizing TFs in “motif...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Publishing Group
2017-08-01
|
Series: | Scientific Reports |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07761-0 |
id |
doaj-41a22669d12d43a38f9d2da0e52d2598 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-41a22669d12d43a38f9d2da0e52d25982020-12-08T00:02:17ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222017-08-017111210.1038/s41598-017-07761-0Modelling the evolution of transcription factor binding preferences in complex eukaryotesAntonio Rosanova0Alberto Colliva1Matteo Osella2Michele Caselle3Department of Physics and INFN, Università degli Studi di TorinoDepartment of Physics and INFN, Università degli Studi di TorinoDepartment of Physics and INFN, Università degli Studi di TorinoDepartment of Physics and INFN, Università degli Studi di TorinoAbstract Transcription factors (TFs) exert their regulatory action by binding to DNA with specific sequence preferences. However, different TFs can partially share their binding sequences due to their common evolutionary origin. This “redundancy” of binding defines a way of organizing TFs in “motif families” by grouping TFs with similar binding preferences. Since these ultimately define the TF target genes, the motif family organization entails information about the structure of transcriptional regulation as it has been shaped by evolution. Focusing on the human TF repertoire, we show that a one-parameter evolutionary model of the Birth-Death-Innovation type can explain the TF empirical repartition in motif families, and allows to highlight the relevant evolutionary forces at the origin of this organization. Moreover, the model allows to pinpoint few deviations from the neutral scenario it assumes: three over-expanded families (including HOX and FOX genes), a set of “singleton” TFs for which duplication seems to be selected against, and a higher-than-average rate of diversification of the binding preferences of TFs with a Zinc Finger DNA binding domain. Finally, a comparison of the TF motif family organization in different eukaryotic species suggests an increase of redundancy of binding with organism complexity.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07761-0 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Antonio Rosanova Alberto Colliva Matteo Osella Michele Caselle |
spellingShingle |
Antonio Rosanova Alberto Colliva Matteo Osella Michele Caselle Modelling the evolution of transcription factor binding preferences in complex eukaryotes Scientific Reports |
author_facet |
Antonio Rosanova Alberto Colliva Matteo Osella Michele Caselle |
author_sort |
Antonio Rosanova |
title |
Modelling the evolution of transcription factor binding preferences in complex eukaryotes |
title_short |
Modelling the evolution of transcription factor binding preferences in complex eukaryotes |
title_full |
Modelling the evolution of transcription factor binding preferences in complex eukaryotes |
title_fullStr |
Modelling the evolution of transcription factor binding preferences in complex eukaryotes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Modelling the evolution of transcription factor binding preferences in complex eukaryotes |
title_sort |
modelling the evolution of transcription factor binding preferences in complex eukaryotes |
publisher |
Nature Publishing Group |
series |
Scientific Reports |
issn |
2045-2322 |
publishDate |
2017-08-01 |
description |
Abstract Transcription factors (TFs) exert their regulatory action by binding to DNA with specific sequence preferences. However, different TFs can partially share their binding sequences due to their common evolutionary origin. This “redundancy” of binding defines a way of organizing TFs in “motif families” by grouping TFs with similar binding preferences. Since these ultimately define the TF target genes, the motif family organization entails information about the structure of transcriptional regulation as it has been shaped by evolution. Focusing on the human TF repertoire, we show that a one-parameter evolutionary model of the Birth-Death-Innovation type can explain the TF empirical repartition in motif families, and allows to highlight the relevant evolutionary forces at the origin of this organization. Moreover, the model allows to pinpoint few deviations from the neutral scenario it assumes: three over-expanded families (including HOX and FOX genes), a set of “singleton” TFs for which duplication seems to be selected against, and a higher-than-average rate of diversification of the binding preferences of TFs with a Zinc Finger DNA binding domain. Finally, a comparison of the TF motif family organization in different eukaryotic species suggests an increase of redundancy of binding with organism complexity. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07761-0 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT antoniorosanova modellingtheevolutionoftranscriptionfactorbindingpreferencesincomplexeukaryotes AT albertocolliva modellingtheevolutionoftranscriptionfactorbindingpreferencesincomplexeukaryotes AT matteoosella modellingtheevolutionoftranscriptionfactorbindingpreferencesincomplexeukaryotes AT michelecaselle modellingtheevolutionoftranscriptionfactorbindingpreferencesincomplexeukaryotes |
_version_ |
1724396913716887552 |