The Effects of Mitigation Measures on Flood Damage Prevention in Korea

This study analyzed the characteristics of flood damages and the effects of structural and non-structural flood damage mitigation measures in Korea. First, a theoretical discussion of the structural and non-structural measures to mitigate flood damages was used to select the variables and devise the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cheol-Hee Son, Jong-In Baek, Yong-Un Ban, Sung-Ryong Ha
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2015-12-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/12/15851
id doaj-4199af2b3950494baad2c14b68787036
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4199af2b3950494baad2c14b687870362020-11-24T22:49:54ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502015-12-01712168661688410.3390/su71215851su71215851The Effects of Mitigation Measures on Flood Damage Prevention in KoreaCheol-Hee Son0Jong-In Baek1Yong-Un Ban2Sung-Ryong Ha3Department of Urban Engineering, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, KoreaDepartment of Urban Engineering, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, KoreaDepartment of Urban Engineering, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, KoreaDepartment of Urban Engineering, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, KoreaThis study analyzed the characteristics of flood damages and the effects of structural and non-structural flood damage mitigation measures in Korea. First, a theoretical discussion of the structural and non-structural measures to mitigate flood damages was used to select the variables and devise the hypotheses. An analysis was conducted using the Auto-Regressive Integrated Moving-Average (ARIMA) time series methodology, Korean socioeconomic data, and damage characteristics of major flood events. The effects of flood damage mitigation measures on the extent of flood damages were assessed using an intervention time series model. The major findings were that the intervention effects of structural and non-structural measures were statistically significant from 1958 to 2013 (a period of 55 years) and that while the former were ineffective at mitigating flood damages, the latter were successful in doing so. Based on the above findings, policy suggestions for future flood damage mitigation measures in Korea were offered. For structural measures, the government should manage its existing facilities, recover ecosystems of damaged rivers, and devise mitigation measures for urban areas. For non-structural measures, the government should enhance its flood forecasting capacity, revise laws related to flood control and prevention, and update and rationalize land-use plans.http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/12/15851flood damage mitigation measuresflood damage preventionintervention time series
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cheol-Hee Son
Jong-In Baek
Yong-Un Ban
Sung-Ryong Ha
spellingShingle Cheol-Hee Son
Jong-In Baek
Yong-Un Ban
Sung-Ryong Ha
The Effects of Mitigation Measures on Flood Damage Prevention in Korea
Sustainability
flood damage mitigation measures
flood damage prevention
intervention time series
author_facet Cheol-Hee Son
Jong-In Baek
Yong-Un Ban
Sung-Ryong Ha
author_sort Cheol-Hee Son
title The Effects of Mitigation Measures on Flood Damage Prevention in Korea
title_short The Effects of Mitigation Measures on Flood Damage Prevention in Korea
title_full The Effects of Mitigation Measures on Flood Damage Prevention in Korea
title_fullStr The Effects of Mitigation Measures on Flood Damage Prevention in Korea
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Mitigation Measures on Flood Damage Prevention in Korea
title_sort effects of mitigation measures on flood damage prevention in korea
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2015-12-01
description This study analyzed the characteristics of flood damages and the effects of structural and non-structural flood damage mitigation measures in Korea. First, a theoretical discussion of the structural and non-structural measures to mitigate flood damages was used to select the variables and devise the hypotheses. An analysis was conducted using the Auto-Regressive Integrated Moving-Average (ARIMA) time series methodology, Korean socioeconomic data, and damage characteristics of major flood events. The effects of flood damage mitigation measures on the extent of flood damages were assessed using an intervention time series model. The major findings were that the intervention effects of structural and non-structural measures were statistically significant from 1958 to 2013 (a period of 55 years) and that while the former were ineffective at mitigating flood damages, the latter were successful in doing so. Based on the above findings, policy suggestions for future flood damage mitigation measures in Korea were offered. For structural measures, the government should manage its existing facilities, recover ecosystems of damaged rivers, and devise mitigation measures for urban areas. For non-structural measures, the government should enhance its flood forecasting capacity, revise laws related to flood control and prevention, and update and rationalize land-use plans.
topic flood damage mitigation measures
flood damage prevention
intervention time series
url http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/12/15851
work_keys_str_mv AT cheolheeson theeffectsofmitigationmeasuresonflooddamagepreventioninkorea
AT jonginbaek theeffectsofmitigationmeasuresonflooddamagepreventioninkorea
AT yongunban theeffectsofmitigationmeasuresonflooddamagepreventioninkorea
AT sungryongha theeffectsofmitigationmeasuresonflooddamagepreventioninkorea
AT cheolheeson effectsofmitigationmeasuresonflooddamagepreventioninkorea
AT jonginbaek effectsofmitigationmeasuresonflooddamagepreventioninkorea
AT yongunban effectsofmitigationmeasuresonflooddamagepreventioninkorea
AT sungryongha effectsofmitigationmeasuresonflooddamagepreventioninkorea
_version_ 1725674420511440896