Peer reviewing an original research paper

Peer reviewing an original research paper

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	M S Tullu, S Karande
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2020-01-01
Series:	Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
Online Access:	http://www.jpgmonline.com/article.asp?issn=0022-3859;year=2020;volume=66;issue=1;spage=1;epage=6;aulast=Tullu

Similar Items

Writing a model research paper: A roadmap
by: M S Tullu, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)

Success in Publishing: Selecting an Appropriate Journal and Braving the Peer-review Process
by: M S Tullu, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)

Quality research in Indian medical colleges and teaching institutions: The need of the hour
by: M S Tullu, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01)

Basic and clinical research, and the review of original papers
by: Ricardo Nitrini

Writing the title and abstract for a research paper: Being concise, precise, and meticulous is the key
by: Milind S Tullu
Published: (2019-01-01)

Building criteria to evaluate qualitative research papers: a tool for peer reviewers
by: António Pedro Costa, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01)

Proposal for ‘segmented peer review’ of multidisciplinary papers
by: Deepak Dinakaran, [MD, PhD], et al.
Published: (2021-02-01)

Open Peer Review by a Selected-Papers Network
by: Christopher eLee
Published: (2012-01-01)

The impact of peer review on the contribution potential of scientific papers
by: Akira Matsui, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01)

Academic Primer Series: Key Papers About Peer Review
by: Lalena M. Yarris, et al.
Published: (2017-04-01)

General Guidelines for Submission of Original Research Papers
by: R. T. Saygitov
Published: (2015-08-01)

General Guidelines for Submission of Original Research Papers
by: R. T. Saygitov
Published: (2015-11-01)

General Guidelines for Submission of Original Research Papers
by: R. T. Saygitov
Published: (2015-11-01)

Criteria of the peer review process for publication of experimental and quasi-experimental research in Psychology: A guide for creating research papers
by: Manuel M. Ramos-Álvarez, et al.
Published: (2008-01-01)

A revisão de artigos científicos Peer review of scientific papers
by: Moisés Goldbaum
Published: (1999-08-01)

Evidence synthesis papers would benefit from segmented peer review
by: Kate Nyhan, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01)

Does Peer Reviewing for COVID-19-Related Papers Still Work?
by: Octavio Orellana-Serradell, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01)

Summary Of Original Papers
by: No Author
Published: (2013-04-01)

Defining and Assessing Adverse Environmental Impact: A Collection of Peer-Reviewed Papers
by: Anne Vindenes Allen
Published: (2002-01-01)

Peer review in high-energy physics: a return to the origins?
by: Fabbrichesi Marco
Published: (2003-09-01)

How Many Papers Should Scientists Be Reviewing? An Analysis Using Verified Peer Review Reports
by: Vincent Raoult
Published: (2020-01-01)

Who Is (Likely) Peer-Reviewing Your Papers? A Partial Insight into the World’s Top Reviewers
by: Francesco Pomponi, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01)

Peer-selected "best papers"-are they really that "good"?
by: Jacques Wainer, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01)

Data on Peer-Reviewed Papers about Green Infrastructure, Urban Nature, and City Liveability
by: Greg D. Simpson, et al.
Published: (2018-11-01)

Research on Recommendation of Chinese Paper Reviewers
by: Hsin-Yu Lo, et al.
Published: (2007)

The evaluation of research papers in the XXI century. The Open Peer Discussion system of the World Economics Association
by: Grazia eIetto-Gillies, et al.
Published: (2012-08-01)

Original (scientific) paper: The IMRAD layout
by: Todorović Ljubomir
Published: (2003-01-01)

The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review
by: Richard D. Morey, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01)

Beta-thalassemia major complicated by intracranial hemorrhage and critical illness polyneuropathy
by: S Sanju, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01)

Experience in training researchers as authors and reviewers of research papers
by: Esperanza Asencio Cabot, et al.
Published: (2018-02-01)

Seasonal Entropy, Diversity and Inequality Measures of Submitted and Accepted Papers Distributions in Peer-Reviewed Journals
by: Marcel Ausloos, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01)

Priming and Prejudice: The Bias Effect of Origin Information on Peer Review, Judgment and Evaluation
by: Luiz Victorino, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01)

Research component : literature review & empirical paper
by: Wilkinson, Kate
Published: (2005)

Research component : literature review & main paper
by: Stewart, Lorna
Published: (2006)

"Thank you for your critical comments and helpful suggestions": compliance and conflict in authors' replies to referees' comments in peer reviews of scientific research papers
by: Hugh Gosden
Published: (2001-04-01)

The “Peer” in “Peer Review”
by: Gad Perry, et al.
Published: (2012-10-01)

The “Peer” in “Peer Review”
by: Gad Perry, et al.
Published: (2011-12-01)

The “Peer” in “Peer Review”
by: Gad Perry, et al.
Published: (2012-07-01)

Original paper Cytokine profiles in axial spondyloarthritis
by: Marta Madej, et al.
Published: (2015-04-01)

Effect of dealing with the commercial paper in the original commitment
by: Boshra Khaled Al-Mola, et al.
Published: (2009-09-01)