Cesarean myomectomy: a case report and review of the literature
Abstract Background Routine myomectomy at the time of cesarean section has been condemned in the past due to fear of uncontrolled hemorrhage and peripartum hysterectomy. It is still a topic of debate worldwide. However, in recent years, many case studies of cesarean myomectomy have been published va...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-04-01
|
Series: | Journal of Medical Case Reports |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-021-02785-7 |
id |
doaj-4186a4bd7e34495990e02fd77f4c02ea |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4186a4bd7e34495990e02fd77f4c02ea2021-04-25T11:18:06ZengBMCJournal of Medical Case Reports1752-19472021-04-011511410.1186/s13256-021-02785-7Cesarean myomectomy: a case report and review of the literaturePriyanka Garg0Romi Bansal1Department of Obstetric and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical SciencesDepartment of Obstetric and Gynecology, Adesh institute of Medical Sciences and ResearchAbstract Background Routine myomectomy at the time of cesarean section has been condemned in the past due to fear of uncontrolled hemorrhage and peripartum hysterectomy. It is still a topic of debate worldwide. However, in recent years, many case studies of cesarean myomectomy have been published validating its safety without any significant complications. Case presentation We describe the case of a 27-year-old gravida 2 para 1 live birth 1 North Indian woman with one previous lower segment caesarean section (LSCS) at 35 weeks with labor pains and scar tenderness. Her recent ultrasound (USG) report suggested a single live intrauterine pregnancy with an intramural fibroid of 8.6 × 6.5 cm located in the left anterolateral wall of the lower uterine segment. The patient was taken up for emergency cesarean section along with successful removal of the myoma, which was bulging into the incision line, causing difficulty in closure of the uterine wound. Prophylactically, oxytocin infusion, bilateral ligation of uterine arteries, and injection vasopressin (diluted) was administered to decrease the blood loss. The patient was discharged after 7 days without any complications. Conclusions Routine myomectomy at the time of cesarean section is not a standard procedure and is not accepted worldwide. However, it may be considered a safe option in carefully selected cases in the hands of an experienced obstetrician with appropriate hemostatic technique. Large multicenter randomized controlled trials should be conducted to evaluate the best practice guidelines for cesarean myomectomy.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-021-02785-7MyomectomyCesareanPostpartum hemorrhagePregnancyFibroid |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Priyanka Garg Romi Bansal |
spellingShingle |
Priyanka Garg Romi Bansal Cesarean myomectomy: a case report and review of the literature Journal of Medical Case Reports Myomectomy Cesarean Postpartum hemorrhage Pregnancy Fibroid |
author_facet |
Priyanka Garg Romi Bansal |
author_sort |
Priyanka Garg |
title |
Cesarean myomectomy: a case report and review of the literature |
title_short |
Cesarean myomectomy: a case report and review of the literature |
title_full |
Cesarean myomectomy: a case report and review of the literature |
title_fullStr |
Cesarean myomectomy: a case report and review of the literature |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cesarean myomectomy: a case report and review of the literature |
title_sort |
cesarean myomectomy: a case report and review of the literature |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Journal of Medical Case Reports |
issn |
1752-1947 |
publishDate |
2021-04-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Routine myomectomy at the time of cesarean section has been condemned in the past due to fear of uncontrolled hemorrhage and peripartum hysterectomy. It is still a topic of debate worldwide. However, in recent years, many case studies of cesarean myomectomy have been published validating its safety without any significant complications. Case presentation We describe the case of a 27-year-old gravida 2 para 1 live birth 1 North Indian woman with one previous lower segment caesarean section (LSCS) at 35 weeks with labor pains and scar tenderness. Her recent ultrasound (USG) report suggested a single live intrauterine pregnancy with an intramural fibroid of 8.6 × 6.5 cm located in the left anterolateral wall of the lower uterine segment. The patient was taken up for emergency cesarean section along with successful removal of the myoma, which was bulging into the incision line, causing difficulty in closure of the uterine wound. Prophylactically, oxytocin infusion, bilateral ligation of uterine arteries, and injection vasopressin (diluted) was administered to decrease the blood loss. The patient was discharged after 7 days without any complications. Conclusions Routine myomectomy at the time of cesarean section is not a standard procedure and is not accepted worldwide. However, it may be considered a safe option in carefully selected cases in the hands of an experienced obstetrician with appropriate hemostatic technique. Large multicenter randomized controlled trials should be conducted to evaluate the best practice guidelines for cesarean myomectomy. |
topic |
Myomectomy Cesarean Postpartum hemorrhage Pregnancy Fibroid |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-021-02785-7 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT priyankagarg cesareanmyomectomyacasereportandreviewoftheliterature AT romibansal cesareanmyomectomyacasereportandreviewoftheliterature |
_version_ |
1721509877489074176 |