Who represents me? A patient‐derived model of patient engagement via patient and family advisory councils (PFACs)

Abstract Background Despite increasing attention to patient and family advisory councils (PFACs), what patients who are not PFAC members expect of PFACs remains understudied. Understanding their expectations is critical if PFACs are to help health systems achieve certain outcomes (eg increased patie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vadim Dukhanin, Scott Feeser, Scott A. Berkowitz, Matthew DeCamp
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-02-01
Series:Health Expectations
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12983
id doaj-41833fab3b3f4669bbdfd4563613cee2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-41833fab3b3f4669bbdfd4563613cee22020-11-25T01:36:00ZengWileyHealth Expectations1369-65131369-76252020-02-0123114815810.1111/hex.12983Who represents me? A patient‐derived model of patient engagement via patient and family advisory councils (PFACs)Vadim Dukhanin0Scott Feeser1Scott A. Berkowitz2Matthew DeCamp3Department of Health Policy and Management Center for Health Services & Outcomes Research Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore MD USAJohns Hopkins Medicine Alliance for Patients, LLC (JMAP) Baltimore MD USAJohns Hopkins Medicine Alliance for Patients, LLC (JMAP) Baltimore MD USADivision of General Internal Medicine Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Baltimore MD USAAbstract Background Despite increasing attention to patient and family advisory councils (PFACs), what patients who are not PFAC members expect of PFACs remains understudied. Understanding their expectations is critical if PFACs are to help health systems achieve certain outcomes (eg increased patient satisfaction with health systems). Objective To obtain rich insights about what patients who are not PFAC members expect of PFACs. Design From July to September 2018, we conducted a qualitative study using focus groups. Setting and participants We recruited patients and caregivers who receive their care from the Johns Hopkins Medicine Alliance for Patients (JMAP), LLC, a Medicare accountable care organization that in 2014 established a PFAC, the Beneficiary Advisory Council. Approach Using grounded theory, we analysed field notes, analytic memos and transcripts to develop a theoretical model of patient engagement via PFACs. Results Forty‐two patients and caregivers participated in five focus groups that included individuals of different ages, races, health statuses and socio‐economic statuses. Participants were largely unaware of PFACs. Participants wanted to know who represented them (interpreted as a form of political representation) and emphasized the need for representatives’ diversity. Who mattered because who could affect what PFACs do. Participants expected that all patients should be able to communicate with PFACs and that meaningful engagement could enhance perceptions of health systems. Conclusions Eliciting views about patient representation from patients who have not been engaged as advisors or representatives has the potential to inform PFACs’ activities. Attention should be given to improving and measuring patients’ awareness of, and interactions with, their patient representatives.https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12983health systemsparticipationpatient engagementpublic involvementrepresentativeness
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vadim Dukhanin
Scott Feeser
Scott A. Berkowitz
Matthew DeCamp
spellingShingle Vadim Dukhanin
Scott Feeser
Scott A. Berkowitz
Matthew DeCamp
Who represents me? A patient‐derived model of patient engagement via patient and family advisory councils (PFACs)
Health Expectations
health systems
participation
patient engagement
public involvement
representativeness
author_facet Vadim Dukhanin
Scott Feeser
Scott A. Berkowitz
Matthew DeCamp
author_sort Vadim Dukhanin
title Who represents me? A patient‐derived model of patient engagement via patient and family advisory councils (PFACs)
title_short Who represents me? A patient‐derived model of patient engagement via patient and family advisory councils (PFACs)
title_full Who represents me? A patient‐derived model of patient engagement via patient and family advisory councils (PFACs)
title_fullStr Who represents me? A patient‐derived model of patient engagement via patient and family advisory councils (PFACs)
title_full_unstemmed Who represents me? A patient‐derived model of patient engagement via patient and family advisory councils (PFACs)
title_sort who represents me? a patient‐derived model of patient engagement via patient and family advisory councils (pfacs)
publisher Wiley
series Health Expectations
issn 1369-6513
1369-7625
publishDate 2020-02-01
description Abstract Background Despite increasing attention to patient and family advisory councils (PFACs), what patients who are not PFAC members expect of PFACs remains understudied. Understanding their expectations is critical if PFACs are to help health systems achieve certain outcomes (eg increased patient satisfaction with health systems). Objective To obtain rich insights about what patients who are not PFAC members expect of PFACs. Design From July to September 2018, we conducted a qualitative study using focus groups. Setting and participants We recruited patients and caregivers who receive their care from the Johns Hopkins Medicine Alliance for Patients (JMAP), LLC, a Medicare accountable care organization that in 2014 established a PFAC, the Beneficiary Advisory Council. Approach Using grounded theory, we analysed field notes, analytic memos and transcripts to develop a theoretical model of patient engagement via PFACs. Results Forty‐two patients and caregivers participated in five focus groups that included individuals of different ages, races, health statuses and socio‐economic statuses. Participants were largely unaware of PFACs. Participants wanted to know who represented them (interpreted as a form of political representation) and emphasized the need for representatives’ diversity. Who mattered because who could affect what PFACs do. Participants expected that all patients should be able to communicate with PFACs and that meaningful engagement could enhance perceptions of health systems. Conclusions Eliciting views about patient representation from patients who have not been engaged as advisors or representatives has the potential to inform PFACs’ activities. Attention should be given to improving and measuring patients’ awareness of, and interactions with, their patient representatives.
topic health systems
participation
patient engagement
public involvement
representativeness
url https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12983
work_keys_str_mv AT vadimdukhanin whorepresentsmeapatientderivedmodelofpatientengagementviapatientandfamilyadvisorycouncilspfacs
AT scottfeeser whorepresentsmeapatientderivedmodelofpatientengagementviapatientandfamilyadvisorycouncilspfacs
AT scottaberkowitz whorepresentsmeapatientderivedmodelofpatientengagementviapatientandfamilyadvisorycouncilspfacs
AT matthewdecamp whorepresentsmeapatientderivedmodelofpatientengagementviapatientandfamilyadvisorycouncilspfacs
_version_ 1725064755520995328