Revisiting validity in cross-cultural psychometric-test development: A systems-informed shift towards qualitative research designs
Background: The problem of enhancing validity in cross-cultural psychometric-test development in the field of clinical psychology has been perpetuated by several factors. Societal biases and value judgements, a positivistic paradigm, and challenges associated with multiculturalism continually spill...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
AOSIS
2011-03-01
|
Series: | South African Journal of Psychiatry |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sajp.org.za/index.php/sajp/article/view/250 |
id |
doaj-417f9557236f473c9b64959a82877c82 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-417f9557236f473c9b64959a82877c822020-11-24T22:09:50ZengAOSISSouth African Journal of Psychiatry 1608-96852078-67862011-03-0117110.4102/sajpsychiatry.v17i1.25071Revisiting validity in cross-cultural psychometric-test development: A systems-informed shift towards qualitative research designsIsabelle Swanepoel0Christa Kruger1Dept of Psychiatry, Univ of PretoriaDept of Psychiatry, Univ of PretoriaBackground: The problem of enhancing validity in cross-cultural psychometric-test development in the field of clinical psychology has been perpetuated by several factors. Societal biases and value judgements, a positivistic paradigm, and challenges associated with multiculturalism continually spill over into cross-cultural research methodology. An overemphasis on quantitative methods and insufficient exploration of the meaning of the concepts to be measured tend to threaten construct validity. Objectives and Methods: This article tracks some of the progress in the field of clinical cross-cultural psychometric-test development – prior to and since the International Test Commission Guidelines, and including the complex South African situation – to give support to the perspective that previous cross-cultural research inadequately equips contemporary researchers to develop valid tests for multicultural clinical contexts. Results: A systems-informed paradigm shift is proposed, which involves the application of systemic concepts such as circularity, relationality, neutrality, and a concern with process issues. Ideally, multidisciplinary, multicultural test-developing teams that include members of the target-cultural group should consult and collaborate with the target groups before embarking on test-adaptation or test-development activities. Such teamwork would help to ensure that the meaning of the relevant concept/s is captured in a valid way for each cultural group. Furthermore, such collaboration should form a part of using qualitative research designs more frequently in clinical cross-cultural psychometric-test development. Conclusions: The emphasis should be on building theory and generating hypotheses, in order to pursue a deeper understanding of the constructs under investigation, and to advance theoretical developments in the field of clinical cross-cultural psychometric-test development.http://www.sajp.org.za/index.php/sajp/article/view/250Psychometric testingvaliditycross-culturalsystems theory |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Isabelle Swanepoel Christa Kruger |
spellingShingle |
Isabelle Swanepoel Christa Kruger Revisiting validity in cross-cultural psychometric-test development: A systems-informed shift towards qualitative research designs South African Journal of Psychiatry Psychometric testing validity cross-cultural systems theory |
author_facet |
Isabelle Swanepoel Christa Kruger |
author_sort |
Isabelle Swanepoel |
title |
Revisiting validity in cross-cultural psychometric-test development: A systems-informed shift towards qualitative research designs |
title_short |
Revisiting validity in cross-cultural psychometric-test development: A systems-informed shift towards qualitative research designs |
title_full |
Revisiting validity in cross-cultural psychometric-test development: A systems-informed shift towards qualitative research designs |
title_fullStr |
Revisiting validity in cross-cultural psychometric-test development: A systems-informed shift towards qualitative research designs |
title_full_unstemmed |
Revisiting validity in cross-cultural psychometric-test development: A systems-informed shift towards qualitative research designs |
title_sort |
revisiting validity in cross-cultural psychometric-test development: a systems-informed shift towards qualitative research designs |
publisher |
AOSIS |
series |
South African Journal of Psychiatry |
issn |
1608-9685 2078-6786 |
publishDate |
2011-03-01 |
description |
Background: The problem of enhancing validity in cross-cultural psychometric-test development in the field of clinical psychology has been perpetuated by several factors. Societal biases and value judgements, a positivistic paradigm, and challenges associated with multiculturalism continually spill over into cross-cultural research methodology. An overemphasis on quantitative methods and insufficient exploration of the meaning of the concepts to be measured tend to threaten construct validity.
Objectives and Methods: This article tracks some of the progress in the field of clinical cross-cultural psychometric-test development – prior to and since the International Test Commission Guidelines, and including the complex South African situation – to give support to the perspective that previous cross-cultural research inadequately equips contemporary researchers to develop valid tests for multicultural clinical contexts.
Results: A systems-informed paradigm shift is proposed, which involves the application of systemic concepts such as circularity, relationality, neutrality, and a concern with process issues. Ideally, multidisciplinary, multicultural test-developing teams that include members of the target-cultural group should consult and collaborate with the target groups before embarking on test-adaptation or test-development activities. Such teamwork would help to ensure that the meaning of the relevant concept/s is captured in a valid way for each cultural group. Furthermore, such collaboration should form a part of using qualitative research designs more frequently in clinical cross-cultural psychometric-test development.
Conclusions: The emphasis should be on building theory and generating hypotheses, in order to pursue a deeper understanding of the constructs under investigation, and to advance theoretical developments in the field of clinical cross-cultural psychometric-test development. |
topic |
Psychometric testing validity cross-cultural systems theory |
url |
http://www.sajp.org.za/index.php/sajp/article/view/250 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT isabelleswanepoel revisitingvalidityincrossculturalpsychometrictestdevelopmentasystemsinformedshifttowardsqualitativeresearchdesigns AT christakruger revisitingvalidityincrossculturalpsychometrictestdevelopmentasystemsinformedshifttowardsqualitativeresearchdesigns |
_version_ |
1725810452840054784 |