An Automated Method for the Quantification and Fractal Analysis of Immunostaining

Aims. In tissue counter analysis (TCA) digital images of complex histologic sections are dissected into elements of equal size and shape, and digital information comprising grey level, colour and texture features is calculated for each element. In this study we assessed the feasibility of TCA for th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Armin Gerger, Patrick Bergthaler, Josef Smolle
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2004-01-01
Series:Cellular Oncology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2004/241921
id doaj-417d3e6f548d443897a83c920a9466bb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-417d3e6f548d443897a83c920a9466bb2020-11-25T01:06:07ZengHindawi LimitedCellular Oncology1570-58701875-86062004-01-0126312513410.1155/2004/241921An Automated Method for the Quantification and Fractal Analysis of ImmunostainingArmin Gerger0Patrick Bergthaler1Josef Smolle2Department of Dermatology, University of Graz, AustriaDepartment of Dermatology, University of Graz, AustriaDepartment of Dermatology, University of Graz, AustriaAims. In tissue counter analysis (TCA) digital images of complex histologic sections are dissected into elements of equal size and shape, and digital information comprising grey level, colour and texture features is calculated for each element. In this study we assessed the feasibility of TCA for the quantitative description of amount and also of distribution of immunostained material. Methods. In a first step, our system was trained for differentiating between background and tissue on the one hand and between immunopositive and so‐called other tissue on the other. In a second step, immunostained slides were automatically screened and the procedure was tested for the quantitative description of amount of cytokeratin (CK) and leukocyte common antigen (LCA) immunopositive structures. Additionally, fractal analysis was applied to all cases describing the architectural distribution of immunostained material. Results. The procedure yielded reproducible assessments of the relative amounts of immunopositive tissue components when the number and percentage of CK and LCA stained structures was assessed. Furthermore, a reliable classification of immunopositive patterns was found by means of fractal dimensionality. Conclusions. Tissue counter analysis combined with classification trees and fractal analysis is a fully automated and reproducible approach for the quantitative description in immunohistology.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2004/241921
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Armin Gerger
Patrick Bergthaler
Josef Smolle
spellingShingle Armin Gerger
Patrick Bergthaler
Josef Smolle
An Automated Method for the Quantification and Fractal Analysis of Immunostaining
Cellular Oncology
author_facet Armin Gerger
Patrick Bergthaler
Josef Smolle
author_sort Armin Gerger
title An Automated Method for the Quantification and Fractal Analysis of Immunostaining
title_short An Automated Method for the Quantification and Fractal Analysis of Immunostaining
title_full An Automated Method for the Quantification and Fractal Analysis of Immunostaining
title_fullStr An Automated Method for the Quantification and Fractal Analysis of Immunostaining
title_full_unstemmed An Automated Method for the Quantification and Fractal Analysis of Immunostaining
title_sort automated method for the quantification and fractal analysis of immunostaining
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Cellular Oncology
issn 1570-5870
1875-8606
publishDate 2004-01-01
description Aims. In tissue counter analysis (TCA) digital images of complex histologic sections are dissected into elements of equal size and shape, and digital information comprising grey level, colour and texture features is calculated for each element. In this study we assessed the feasibility of TCA for the quantitative description of amount and also of distribution of immunostained material. Methods. In a first step, our system was trained for differentiating between background and tissue on the one hand and between immunopositive and so‐called other tissue on the other. In a second step, immunostained slides were automatically screened and the procedure was tested for the quantitative description of amount of cytokeratin (CK) and leukocyte common antigen (LCA) immunopositive structures. Additionally, fractal analysis was applied to all cases describing the architectural distribution of immunostained material. Results. The procedure yielded reproducible assessments of the relative amounts of immunopositive tissue components when the number and percentage of CK and LCA stained structures was assessed. Furthermore, a reliable classification of immunopositive patterns was found by means of fractal dimensionality. Conclusions. Tissue counter analysis combined with classification trees and fractal analysis is a fully automated and reproducible approach for the quantitative description in immunohistology.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2004/241921
work_keys_str_mv AT armingerger anautomatedmethodforthequantificationandfractalanalysisofimmunostaining
AT patrickbergthaler anautomatedmethodforthequantificationandfractalanalysisofimmunostaining
AT josefsmolle anautomatedmethodforthequantificationandfractalanalysisofimmunostaining
AT armingerger automatedmethodforthequantificationandfractalanalysisofimmunostaining
AT patrickbergthaler automatedmethodforthequantificationandfractalanalysisofimmunostaining
AT josefsmolle automatedmethodforthequantificationandfractalanalysisofimmunostaining
_version_ 1725191289900630016