An Automated Method for the Quantification and Fractal Analysis of Immunostaining
Aims. In tissue counter analysis (TCA) digital images of complex histologic sections are dissected into elements of equal size and shape, and digital information comprising grey level, colour and texture features is calculated for each element. In this study we assessed the feasibility of TCA for th...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2004-01-01
|
Series: | Cellular Oncology |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2004/241921 |
id |
doaj-417d3e6f548d443897a83c920a9466bb |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-417d3e6f548d443897a83c920a9466bb2020-11-25T01:06:07ZengHindawi LimitedCellular Oncology1570-58701875-86062004-01-0126312513410.1155/2004/241921An Automated Method for the Quantification and Fractal Analysis of ImmunostainingArmin Gerger0Patrick Bergthaler1Josef Smolle2Department of Dermatology, University of Graz, AustriaDepartment of Dermatology, University of Graz, AustriaDepartment of Dermatology, University of Graz, AustriaAims. In tissue counter analysis (TCA) digital images of complex histologic sections are dissected into elements of equal size and shape, and digital information comprising grey level, colour and texture features is calculated for each element. In this study we assessed the feasibility of TCA for the quantitative description of amount and also of distribution of immunostained material. Methods. In a first step, our system was trained for differentiating between background and tissue on the one hand and between immunopositive and so‐called other tissue on the other. In a second step, immunostained slides were automatically screened and the procedure was tested for the quantitative description of amount of cytokeratin (CK) and leukocyte common antigen (LCA) immunopositive structures. Additionally, fractal analysis was applied to all cases describing the architectural distribution of immunostained material. Results. The procedure yielded reproducible assessments of the relative amounts of immunopositive tissue components when the number and percentage of CK and LCA stained structures was assessed. Furthermore, a reliable classification of immunopositive patterns was found by means of fractal dimensionality. Conclusions. Tissue counter analysis combined with classification trees and fractal analysis is a fully automated and reproducible approach for the quantitative description in immunohistology.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2004/241921 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Armin Gerger Patrick Bergthaler Josef Smolle |
spellingShingle |
Armin Gerger Patrick Bergthaler Josef Smolle An Automated Method for the Quantification and Fractal Analysis of Immunostaining Cellular Oncology |
author_facet |
Armin Gerger Patrick Bergthaler Josef Smolle |
author_sort |
Armin Gerger |
title |
An Automated Method for the Quantification and Fractal Analysis of Immunostaining |
title_short |
An Automated Method for the Quantification and Fractal Analysis of Immunostaining |
title_full |
An Automated Method for the Quantification and Fractal Analysis of Immunostaining |
title_fullStr |
An Automated Method for the Quantification and Fractal Analysis of Immunostaining |
title_full_unstemmed |
An Automated Method for the Quantification and Fractal Analysis of Immunostaining |
title_sort |
automated method for the quantification and fractal analysis of immunostaining |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Cellular Oncology |
issn |
1570-5870 1875-8606 |
publishDate |
2004-01-01 |
description |
Aims. In tissue counter analysis (TCA) digital images of complex histologic sections are dissected into elements of equal size and shape, and digital information comprising grey level, colour and texture features is calculated for each element. In this study we assessed the feasibility of TCA for the quantitative description of amount and also of distribution of immunostained material. Methods. In a first step, our system was trained for differentiating between background and tissue on the one hand and between immunopositive and so‐called other tissue on the other. In a second step, immunostained slides were automatically screened and the procedure was tested for the quantitative description of amount of cytokeratin (CK) and leukocyte common antigen (LCA) immunopositive structures. Additionally, fractal analysis was applied to all cases describing the architectural distribution of immunostained material. Results. The procedure yielded reproducible assessments of the relative amounts of immunopositive tissue components when the number and percentage of CK and LCA stained structures was assessed. Furthermore, a reliable classification of immunopositive patterns was found by means of fractal dimensionality. Conclusions. Tissue counter analysis combined with classification trees and fractal analysis is a fully automated and reproducible approach for the quantitative description in immunohistology. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2004/241921 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT armingerger anautomatedmethodforthequantificationandfractalanalysisofimmunostaining AT patrickbergthaler anautomatedmethodforthequantificationandfractalanalysisofimmunostaining AT josefsmolle anautomatedmethodforthequantificationandfractalanalysisofimmunostaining AT armingerger automatedmethodforthequantificationandfractalanalysisofimmunostaining AT patrickbergthaler automatedmethodforthequantificationandfractalanalysisofimmunostaining AT josefsmolle automatedmethodforthequantificationandfractalanalysisofimmunostaining |
_version_ |
1725191289900630016 |