2127 Validation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance aortic distensibility with applanation tonometry pulse wave velocity

2127 Validation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance aortic distensibility with applanation tonometry pulse wave velocity

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Meredith Ian T, Cameron James D, Hope Sarah A, Piantadosi Cynthia, Worthley Stephen G, Carbone Angelo, Nelson Adam J, Worthley Matthew I
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	BMC 2008-10-01
Series:	Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Similar Items

Evaluation of aortic distensibility in patients with mitral valve prolapse using echocardiography and applanation tonometry
by: Sedat Kalkan, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01)

Aortic pulse wave velocity measured by pulse wave imaging (PWI): A comparison with applanation tonometry
by: Jonathan Vappou, et al.
Published: (2011-04-01)

Reproducibility of aortic pulse wave velocity measurements obtained with Phase Contrast Magnetic Resonance (PCMR) and applanation tonometry
by: Raggi Paolo, et al.
Published: (2009-01-01)

P2.07 CENTRAL HEMODYNAMIC ESTIMATES BY ULTRASOUND-DERIVED CAROTID DISTENSION WAVEFORMS: COMPARISON WITH APPLANATION TONOMETRY
by: C. Palombo, et al.
Published: (2012-11-01)

Comparison of rebound tonometry and non-contact airpuff tonometry to Goldmann applanation tonometry
by: Goktug Demirci, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01)

Evaluation of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus
by: Fatih Özcura, et al.
Published: (2017-04-01)

Evaluation of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus
by: Maddalena De Bernardo, et al.
Published: (2018-04-01)

Comparison of Applanation Tonometry with and without Fluorescein
by: Shahram Bamdad, et al.
Published: (2011-02-01)

Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in normal and glaucomatous eyes
by: Fatih Özcura, et al.
Published: (2015-04-01)

How to measure intraocular pressure: applanation tonometry
by: Sue Stevens, et al.
Published: (2007-12-01)

How to measure intraocular pressure: applanation tonometry
by: Nick Astbury, et al.
Published: (2012-01-01)

Applanation Resonance Tonometry for Intraocular Pressure Measurement
by: Hallberg, Per
Published: (2006)

Differences between Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Dynamic Contour Tonometry following Trabeculectomy
by: Efstathios T. Detorakis, et al.
Published: (2010-01-01)

Tonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry
by: Herr A, et al.
Published: (2013-05-01)

Consistency of Ocular Palpation Tonometry with Goldman Applanation Tonometry and Its Reproducibility by Separate Examiners
by: Mehmet Özveren, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01)

Comparison of Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Icare Rebound Tonometry in Eyes of Varied Corneal Thickness
by: Isil Pasaoglu, et al.
Published: (2017-05-01)

Comparison of Rebound Tonometry, Perkins Applanation Tonometry and Ocular Response Analyser in Mucopolysaccharidosis Patients.
by: Joanna Wasielica-Poslednik, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01)

Comparison of Diaton transpalpebral tonometer with applanation tonometry in keratoconus
by: Robert PL Wisse, et al.
Published: (2016-03-01)

Development of Image Processing Methods to Extract Biomarkers of Aortic Aging from MRI and Applanation Tonometry
by: Bargiotas, Ioannis
Published: (2015)

Reply to comment by De Bernardo and Rosa on “Evaluation of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus”
by: Fatih Özcura, et al.
Published: (2018-04-01)

Accuracy of dynamic contour tonometry, Goldmann applanation tonometry, and Tono-Pen XL in edematous corneas
by: George A. Kontadakis, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01)

Rebound tonometry compared with goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with corneal pathology - a reliability study
by: Lamprecht, Johann Streicher
Published: (2017)

Applanation tonometry for evaluation of the haemodynamic response to the active orthostatic test
by: Rene Mileva-Popova, et al.
Published: (2017-07-01)

When goldmann applanation tonometry is not reliable in post Lasik situations
by: K S Santhan Gopal
Published: (2011-01-01)

Augmentation index assessed by applanation tonometry is elevated in Marfan Syndrome
by: Maxwell Simon R, et al.
Published: (2007-10-01)

Noninvasive evaluation of varying pulse pressures in vivo using brachial sphymomanometry, applanation tonometry, and Pulse Wave Ultrasound Manometry
by: Ronny X. Li, et al.
Published: (2017-03-01)

1.1 COMPARISON OF VARIOUS METHODS FOR THE ESTIMATION FOR AORTIC CHARACTERISTIC IMPEDANCE IN TIME DOMAIN FROM VELOCITY-ENCODED MAGNETIC RESONANCE AND APPLANATION TONOMETRY DATA
by: E. Bollache, et al.
Published: (2013-11-01)

Ageing, hypertension and aortic valve stenosis – Understanding the series circuit using cardiac magnetic resonance and applanation tonometry
by: S.L. Hungerford, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01)

Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness and corneal curvature
by: Andreanos K, et al.
Published: (2016-12-01)

Intraocular pressure measurements with Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in eyes after IntraLASIK or LASEK
by: Shemesh G, et al.
Published: (2012-11-01)

Evaluation of arterial stiffness in cardiac surgical patients using applanation tonometry
by: Federico Franchi, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

Digital Photoplethysmography for Assessment of Arterial Stiffness: Repeatability and Comparison with Applanation Tonometry.
by: Emma von Wowern, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01)

Tonographic Effect of Ocular Response Analyzer in Comparison to Goldmann Applanation Tonometry.
by: Martin Zimmermann, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)

Dependence of dynamic contour and Goldmann applanation tonometries on peripheral corneal thickness
by: Federico Saenz-Frances, et al.
Published: (2017-10-01)

Characterization of Arterial Wave Reflection in Healthy Bonnet Macaques: Feasibility of Applanation Tonometry
by: Jason Lazar, et al.
Published: (2009-01-01)

P2.03 COMPARISON OF COMMON CAROTID ARTERY DISTENSION WAVE WITH TONOMETRY FOR CENTRAL PULSE PRESSURE ASSESSMENT
by: A. Bertaux, et al.
Published: (2012-11-01)

3.2 ASCENDING AND DESCENDING AORTA PULSE WAVE VELOCITY AND DISTENSIBILITY IN BICUSPID AORTIC VALVE PATIENTS
by: Andrea Guala, et al.
Published: (2017-12-01)

2.2 INACCURACIES WITH BRACHIAL AND RADIAL APPLANATION TONOMETRY: SIMILAR IN MAGNITUDE, BUT IN OPPOSITE DIRECTION
by: T.L. de Backer, et al.
Published: (2012-11-01)

Comparison of the corrected intraocular pressure by tonopachy with that of Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal and glaucomatous patients
by: Girish Velis, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

P2.21 AGREEMENT OF CENTRAL BLOOD PRESSURE MEASURED BY APPLANATION TONOMETRY AND ECHOTRACKING
by: M.A. Alivon, et al.
Published: (2013-11-01)