Plant neighbour identity matters to belowground interactions under controlled conditions.

BACKGROUND: Root competition is an almost ubiquitous feature of plant communities with profound effects on their structure and composition. Far beyond the traditional view that plants interact mainly through resource depletion (exploitation competition), roots are known to be able to interact with t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cristina Armas, Francisco Ignacio Pugnaire
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2011-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3219686?pdf=render
id doaj-4164e23f1a95429fa2ba1b0baeda30fc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4164e23f1a95429fa2ba1b0baeda30fc2020-11-25T00:52:36ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032011-01-01611e2779110.1371/journal.pone.0027791Plant neighbour identity matters to belowground interactions under controlled conditions.Cristina ArmasFrancisco Ignacio PugnaireBACKGROUND: Root competition is an almost ubiquitous feature of plant communities with profound effects on their structure and composition. Far beyond the traditional view that plants interact mainly through resource depletion (exploitation competition), roots are known to be able to interact with their environment using a large variety of mechanisms that may inhibit or enhance access of other roots to the resource or affect plant growth (contest interactions). However, an extensive analysis on how these contest root interactions may affect species interaction abilities is almost lacking. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In a common garden experiment with ten perennial plant species we forced pairs of plants of the same or different species to overlap their roots and analyzed how belowground contest interactions affected plant performance, biomass allocation patterns, and competitive abilities under abundant resource supply. Our results showed that net interaction outcome ranged from negative to positive, affecting total plant mass and allocation patterns. A species could be a strong competitor against one species, weaker against another one, and even facilitator to a third species. This leads to sets of species where competitive hierarchies may be clear but also to groups where such rankings are not, suggesting that intransitive root interactions may be crucial for species coexistence. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The outcome of belowground contest interactions is strongly dependent on neighbours' identity. In natural plant communities this conditional outcome may hypothetically help species to interact in non-hierarchical and intransitive networks, which in turn might promote coexistence.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3219686?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cristina Armas
Francisco Ignacio Pugnaire
spellingShingle Cristina Armas
Francisco Ignacio Pugnaire
Plant neighbour identity matters to belowground interactions under controlled conditions.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Cristina Armas
Francisco Ignacio Pugnaire
author_sort Cristina Armas
title Plant neighbour identity matters to belowground interactions under controlled conditions.
title_short Plant neighbour identity matters to belowground interactions under controlled conditions.
title_full Plant neighbour identity matters to belowground interactions under controlled conditions.
title_fullStr Plant neighbour identity matters to belowground interactions under controlled conditions.
title_full_unstemmed Plant neighbour identity matters to belowground interactions under controlled conditions.
title_sort plant neighbour identity matters to belowground interactions under controlled conditions.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2011-01-01
description BACKGROUND: Root competition is an almost ubiquitous feature of plant communities with profound effects on their structure and composition. Far beyond the traditional view that plants interact mainly through resource depletion (exploitation competition), roots are known to be able to interact with their environment using a large variety of mechanisms that may inhibit or enhance access of other roots to the resource or affect plant growth (contest interactions). However, an extensive analysis on how these contest root interactions may affect species interaction abilities is almost lacking. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In a common garden experiment with ten perennial plant species we forced pairs of plants of the same or different species to overlap their roots and analyzed how belowground contest interactions affected plant performance, biomass allocation patterns, and competitive abilities under abundant resource supply. Our results showed that net interaction outcome ranged from negative to positive, affecting total plant mass and allocation patterns. A species could be a strong competitor against one species, weaker against another one, and even facilitator to a third species. This leads to sets of species where competitive hierarchies may be clear but also to groups where such rankings are not, suggesting that intransitive root interactions may be crucial for species coexistence. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The outcome of belowground contest interactions is strongly dependent on neighbours' identity. In natural plant communities this conditional outcome may hypothetically help species to interact in non-hierarchical and intransitive networks, which in turn might promote coexistence.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3219686?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT cristinaarmas plantneighbouridentitymatterstobelowgroundinteractionsundercontrolledconditions
AT franciscoignaciopugnaire plantneighbouridentitymatterstobelowgroundinteractionsundercontrolledconditions
_version_ 1725241347937402880