Comparison of devices used for stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms.

INTRODUCTION: Two self-expandable stents, the Neuroform and the Enterprise stent, are widely used for stent-assisted coiling (SAC) of complex shaped intracranial aneurysms. However, comparative knowledge about technical feasibility, peri- and post-procedural morbidity and mortality, packing densitie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Benjamin Izar, Ansaar Rai, Karthikram Raghuram, Jill Rotruck, Jeffrey Carpenter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2011-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3178562?pdf=render
id doaj-4160cd5e7a5b4106be205f6d0442fa8b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4160cd5e7a5b4106be205f6d0442fa8b2020-11-25T02:51:44ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032011-01-0169e2487510.1371/journal.pone.0024875Comparison of devices used for stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms.Benjamin IzarAnsaar RaiKarthikram RaghuramJill RotruckJeffrey CarpenterINTRODUCTION: Two self-expandable stents, the Neuroform and the Enterprise stent, are widely used for stent-assisted coiling (SAC) of complex shaped intracranial aneurysms. However, comparative knowledge about technical feasibility, peri- and post-procedural morbidity and mortality, packing densities as well as follow-up data is limited. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study to investigate differences in aneurysms stented with the Enterprise or Neuroform stents. Angiographic follow-up (mean 19.42 months) was available in 72.6% (61/84) of aneurysms treated with stent-assisted coiling. We further sought to compare stent-assisted coiling to a matched patient population with aneurysms treated by conventional coil embolization. RESULTS: The stenting success rate of the Enterprise was higher compared to the Neuroform stent (46/48 and 42/51, respectively). In 5 of 9 cases in which the Neuroform stent was not navigable to the landing zone, we successfully deployed an Enterprise stent instead. Eventually, 42 aneurysms were coiled after stenting in each group. We observed no significant differences in peri-procedural complication rate, post-procedural hospital stay, packing density, recurrence rate or number of in-stent stenosis. Strikingly, 36.1% of followed aneurysms in the SAC group showed progressive occlusion on angiographic follow-up imaging. The packing density was significantly higher in aneurysms treated by SAC as compared to conventionally coiled aneurysms, while recanalization rate was significantly lower in the SAC group. CONCLUSION: The procedural success rate is higher using the Enterprise, but otherwise both stents exhibited similar characteristics. Lower recurrence frequency and complication rates comparable to conventional coil embolization emphasize the importance of stent-assisted coiling in the treatment of complex aneurysms. Progressive occlusion on angiographic follow-up was a distinct and frequent observation in the SAC group and may in part be due to flow diversion.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3178562?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Benjamin Izar
Ansaar Rai
Karthikram Raghuram
Jill Rotruck
Jeffrey Carpenter
spellingShingle Benjamin Izar
Ansaar Rai
Karthikram Raghuram
Jill Rotruck
Jeffrey Carpenter
Comparison of devices used for stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Benjamin Izar
Ansaar Rai
Karthikram Raghuram
Jill Rotruck
Jeffrey Carpenter
author_sort Benjamin Izar
title Comparison of devices used for stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms.
title_short Comparison of devices used for stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms.
title_full Comparison of devices used for stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms.
title_fullStr Comparison of devices used for stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms.
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of devices used for stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms.
title_sort comparison of devices used for stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2011-01-01
description INTRODUCTION: Two self-expandable stents, the Neuroform and the Enterprise stent, are widely used for stent-assisted coiling (SAC) of complex shaped intracranial aneurysms. However, comparative knowledge about technical feasibility, peri- and post-procedural morbidity and mortality, packing densities as well as follow-up data is limited. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study to investigate differences in aneurysms stented with the Enterprise or Neuroform stents. Angiographic follow-up (mean 19.42 months) was available in 72.6% (61/84) of aneurysms treated with stent-assisted coiling. We further sought to compare stent-assisted coiling to a matched patient population with aneurysms treated by conventional coil embolization. RESULTS: The stenting success rate of the Enterprise was higher compared to the Neuroform stent (46/48 and 42/51, respectively). In 5 of 9 cases in which the Neuroform stent was not navigable to the landing zone, we successfully deployed an Enterprise stent instead. Eventually, 42 aneurysms were coiled after stenting in each group. We observed no significant differences in peri-procedural complication rate, post-procedural hospital stay, packing density, recurrence rate or number of in-stent stenosis. Strikingly, 36.1% of followed aneurysms in the SAC group showed progressive occlusion on angiographic follow-up imaging. The packing density was significantly higher in aneurysms treated by SAC as compared to conventionally coiled aneurysms, while recanalization rate was significantly lower in the SAC group. CONCLUSION: The procedural success rate is higher using the Enterprise, but otherwise both stents exhibited similar characteristics. Lower recurrence frequency and complication rates comparable to conventional coil embolization emphasize the importance of stent-assisted coiling in the treatment of complex aneurysms. Progressive occlusion on angiographic follow-up was a distinct and frequent observation in the SAC group and may in part be due to flow diversion.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3178562?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT benjaminizar comparisonofdevicesusedforstentassistedcoilingofintracranialaneurysms
AT ansaarrai comparisonofdevicesusedforstentassistedcoilingofintracranialaneurysms
AT karthikramraghuram comparisonofdevicesusedforstentassistedcoilingofintracranialaneurysms
AT jillrotruck comparisonofdevicesusedforstentassistedcoilingofintracranialaneurysms
AT jeffreycarpenter comparisonofdevicesusedforstentassistedcoilingofintracranialaneurysms
_version_ 1724733731092037632