Genomic GC content drifts downward in most bacterial genomes.

In every kingdom of life, GC->AT transitions occur more frequently than any other type of mutation due to the spontaneous deamination of cytidine. In eukaryotic genomes, this slow loss of GC base pairs is counteracted by biased gene conversion which increases genomic GC content as part of the rec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bert Ely
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244163
id doaj-416052e55a8c40dda780adab1bbf4ea4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-416052e55a8c40dda780adab1bbf4ea42021-06-10T04:33:03ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01165e024416310.1371/journal.pone.0244163Genomic GC content drifts downward in most bacterial genomes.Bert ElyIn every kingdom of life, GC->AT transitions occur more frequently than any other type of mutation due to the spontaneous deamination of cytidine. In eukaryotic genomes, this slow loss of GC base pairs is counteracted by biased gene conversion which increases genomic GC content as part of the recombination process. However, this type of biased gene conversion has not been observed in bacterial genomes, so we hypothesized that GC->AT transitions cause a reduction of genomic GC content in prokaryotic genomes on an evolutionary time scale. To test this hypothesis, we used a phylogenetic approach to analyze triplets of closely related genomes representing a wide range of the bacterial kingdom. The resulting data indicate that genomic GC content is drifting downward in bacterial genomes where GC base pairs comprise 40% or more of the total genome. In contrast, genomes containing less than 40% GC base pairs have fewer opportunities for GC->AT transitions to occur so genomic GC content is relatively stable or actually increasing. It should be noted that this observed change in genomic GC content is the net change in shared parts of the genome and does not apply to parts of the genome that have been lost or acquired since the genomes being compared shared common ancestor. However, a more detailed analysis of two Caulobacter genomes revealed that the acquisition of mobile elements by the two genomes actually reduced the total genomic GC content as well.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244163
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bert Ely
spellingShingle Bert Ely
Genomic GC content drifts downward in most bacterial genomes.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Bert Ely
author_sort Bert Ely
title Genomic GC content drifts downward in most bacterial genomes.
title_short Genomic GC content drifts downward in most bacterial genomes.
title_full Genomic GC content drifts downward in most bacterial genomes.
title_fullStr Genomic GC content drifts downward in most bacterial genomes.
title_full_unstemmed Genomic GC content drifts downward in most bacterial genomes.
title_sort genomic gc content drifts downward in most bacterial genomes.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2021-01-01
description In every kingdom of life, GC->AT transitions occur more frequently than any other type of mutation due to the spontaneous deamination of cytidine. In eukaryotic genomes, this slow loss of GC base pairs is counteracted by biased gene conversion which increases genomic GC content as part of the recombination process. However, this type of biased gene conversion has not been observed in bacterial genomes, so we hypothesized that GC->AT transitions cause a reduction of genomic GC content in prokaryotic genomes on an evolutionary time scale. To test this hypothesis, we used a phylogenetic approach to analyze triplets of closely related genomes representing a wide range of the bacterial kingdom. The resulting data indicate that genomic GC content is drifting downward in bacterial genomes where GC base pairs comprise 40% or more of the total genome. In contrast, genomes containing less than 40% GC base pairs have fewer opportunities for GC->AT transitions to occur so genomic GC content is relatively stable or actually increasing. It should be noted that this observed change in genomic GC content is the net change in shared parts of the genome and does not apply to parts of the genome that have been lost or acquired since the genomes being compared shared common ancestor. However, a more detailed analysis of two Caulobacter genomes revealed that the acquisition of mobile elements by the two genomes actually reduced the total genomic GC content as well.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244163
work_keys_str_mv AT bertely genomicgccontentdriftsdownwardinmostbacterialgenomes
_version_ 1721386250714218496