Comparison of the microtensile bond strength of different composite core materials and bonding systems to a fiber post (DT Light)

  Background and Aims: Retention and stability of the post and core system is the key factor for success of final restoration . The aim of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength of the different composite core materials and bonding systems to a fiber post.   Materials and Methods:...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lelya Sadighpour, Sousan Mir Mohammad Rezaei, Hamid Jalali, Shadab Rashtak
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2013-10-01
Series:Journal of Dental Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jdm.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-25-723&slc_lang=en&sid=1
id doaj-415ac873179a404981cbcc3144c5a30c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-415ac873179a404981cbcc3144c5a30c2020-11-24T23:16:58ZfasTehran University of Medical SciencesJournal of Dental Medicine1024-641X2008-24442013-10-01264251261Comparison of the microtensile bond strength of different composite core materials and bonding systems to a fiber post (DT Light)Lelya Sadighpour0Sousan Mir Mohammad Rezaei1Hamid Jalali2Shadab Rashtak3   Background and Aims: Retention and stability of the post and core system is the key factor for success of final restoration . The aim of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength of the different composite core materials and bonding systems to a fiber post.   Materials and Methods: To evaluate the bond strength of the composite resins to a fiber post ( DT light post) 60 posts were divided into six groups : group A: Heliomolar Flow + Seal Bond, group B: Heliomolar Flow + SE Bond , group C: Valux Plus + Seal Bond , group D: Valux Plus + SE Bond , group E: Corecem + Seal Bond, group F: Corecem + SE Bond. All samples were thermocycled for 5000 cycles (5-55 0C) and cut into four bars for the microtensile bond strength test. Failure modes were identified using a stereomicroscope. Data were analysed using One-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD post hoc test (P<0.05).   Results: The interaction between composite resin materials and bonding systems were positive. The conventional hybrid composite (Valux Plus) had significantly higher bond strength compared with the core specific flowable composite (Corecem) when Seal Bond was applied as bonding agent (P<0.05). However, when SE Bond was utilized hybrid composite demonstrated significantly lower bond strength than that of other two groups (P<0.05).   Conclusion: The performance of a particular composite is affected by the bonding system that is applied. A single composite resin may have different bond strength when combined with different bonding system. http://jdm.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-25-723&slc_lang=en&sid=1Bond strength Composite resin Bonding system
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lelya Sadighpour
Sousan Mir Mohammad Rezaei
Hamid Jalali
Shadab Rashtak
spellingShingle Lelya Sadighpour
Sousan Mir Mohammad Rezaei
Hamid Jalali
Shadab Rashtak
Comparison of the microtensile bond strength of different composite core materials and bonding systems to a fiber post (DT Light)
Journal of Dental Medicine
Bond strength
Composite resin
Bonding system
author_facet Lelya Sadighpour
Sousan Mir Mohammad Rezaei
Hamid Jalali
Shadab Rashtak
author_sort Lelya Sadighpour
title Comparison of the microtensile bond strength of different composite core materials and bonding systems to a fiber post (DT Light)
title_short Comparison of the microtensile bond strength of different composite core materials and bonding systems to a fiber post (DT Light)
title_full Comparison of the microtensile bond strength of different composite core materials and bonding systems to a fiber post (DT Light)
title_fullStr Comparison of the microtensile bond strength of different composite core materials and bonding systems to a fiber post (DT Light)
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the microtensile bond strength of different composite core materials and bonding systems to a fiber post (DT Light)
title_sort comparison of the microtensile bond strength of different composite core materials and bonding systems to a fiber post (dt light)
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
series Journal of Dental Medicine
issn 1024-641X
2008-2444
publishDate 2013-10-01
description   Background and Aims: Retention and stability of the post and core system is the key factor for success of final restoration . The aim of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength of the different composite core materials and bonding systems to a fiber post.   Materials and Methods: To evaluate the bond strength of the composite resins to a fiber post ( DT light post) 60 posts were divided into six groups : group A: Heliomolar Flow + Seal Bond, group B: Heliomolar Flow + SE Bond , group C: Valux Plus + Seal Bond , group D: Valux Plus + SE Bond , group E: Corecem + Seal Bond, group F: Corecem + SE Bond. All samples were thermocycled for 5000 cycles (5-55 0C) and cut into four bars for the microtensile bond strength test. Failure modes were identified using a stereomicroscope. Data were analysed using One-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD post hoc test (P<0.05).   Results: The interaction between composite resin materials and bonding systems were positive. The conventional hybrid composite (Valux Plus) had significantly higher bond strength compared with the core specific flowable composite (Corecem) when Seal Bond was applied as bonding agent (P<0.05). However, when SE Bond was utilized hybrid composite demonstrated significantly lower bond strength than that of other two groups (P<0.05).   Conclusion: The performance of a particular composite is affected by the bonding system that is applied. A single composite resin may have different bond strength when combined with different bonding system.
topic Bond strength
Composite resin
Bonding system
url http://jdm.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-25-723&slc_lang=en&sid=1
work_keys_str_mv AT lelyasadighpour comparisonofthemicrotensilebondstrengthofdifferentcompositecorematerialsandbondingsystemstoafiberpostdtlight
AT sousanmirmohammadrezaei comparisonofthemicrotensilebondstrengthofdifferentcompositecorematerialsandbondingsystemstoafiberpostdtlight
AT hamidjalali comparisonofthemicrotensilebondstrengthofdifferentcompositecorematerialsandbondingsystemstoafiberpostdtlight
AT shadabrashtak comparisonofthemicrotensilebondstrengthofdifferentcompositecorematerialsandbondingsystemstoafiberpostdtlight
_version_ 1725585538367356928