Comparison of the microtensile bond strength of different composite core materials and bonding systems to a fiber post (DT Light)
Background and Aims: Retention and stability of the post and core system is the key factor for success of final restoration . The aim of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength of the different composite core materials and bonding systems to a fiber post. Materials and Methods:...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fas |
Published: |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
2013-10-01
|
Series: | Journal of Dental Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://jdm.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-25-723&slc_lang=en&sid=1 |
id |
doaj-415ac873179a404981cbcc3144c5a30c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-415ac873179a404981cbcc3144c5a30c2020-11-24T23:16:58ZfasTehran University of Medical SciencesJournal of Dental Medicine1024-641X2008-24442013-10-01264251261Comparison of the microtensile bond strength of different composite core materials and bonding systems to a fiber post (DT Light)Lelya Sadighpour0Sousan Mir Mohammad Rezaei1Hamid Jalali2Shadab Rashtak3 Background and Aims: Retention and stability of the post and core system is the key factor for success of final restoration . The aim of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength of the different composite core materials and bonding systems to a fiber post. Materials and Methods: To evaluate the bond strength of the composite resins to a fiber post ( DT light post) 60 posts were divided into six groups : group A: Heliomolar Flow + Seal Bond, group B: Heliomolar Flow + SE Bond , group C: Valux Plus + Seal Bond , group D: Valux Plus + SE Bond , group E: Corecem + Seal Bond, group F: Corecem + SE Bond. All samples were thermocycled for 5000 cycles (5-55 0C) and cut into four bars for the microtensile bond strength test. Failure modes were identified using a stereomicroscope. Data were analysed using One-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD post hoc test (P<0.05). Results: The interaction between composite resin materials and bonding systems were positive. The conventional hybrid composite (Valux Plus) had significantly higher bond strength compared with the core specific flowable composite (Corecem) when Seal Bond was applied as bonding agent (P<0.05). However, when SE Bond was utilized hybrid composite demonstrated significantly lower bond strength than that of other two groups (P<0.05). Conclusion: The performance of a particular composite is affected by the bonding system that is applied. A single composite resin may have different bond strength when combined with different bonding system. http://jdm.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-25-723&slc_lang=en&sid=1Bond strength Composite resin Bonding system |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
fas |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Lelya Sadighpour Sousan Mir Mohammad Rezaei Hamid Jalali Shadab Rashtak |
spellingShingle |
Lelya Sadighpour Sousan Mir Mohammad Rezaei Hamid Jalali Shadab Rashtak Comparison of the microtensile bond strength of different composite core materials and bonding systems to a fiber post (DT Light) Journal of Dental Medicine Bond strength Composite resin Bonding system |
author_facet |
Lelya Sadighpour Sousan Mir Mohammad Rezaei Hamid Jalali Shadab Rashtak |
author_sort |
Lelya Sadighpour |
title |
Comparison of the microtensile bond strength of different composite core materials and bonding systems to a fiber post (DT Light) |
title_short |
Comparison of the microtensile bond strength of different composite core materials and bonding systems to a fiber post (DT Light) |
title_full |
Comparison of the microtensile bond strength of different composite core materials and bonding systems to a fiber post (DT Light) |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of the microtensile bond strength of different composite core materials and bonding systems to a fiber post (DT Light) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of the microtensile bond strength of different composite core materials and bonding systems to a fiber post (DT Light) |
title_sort |
comparison of the microtensile bond strength of different composite core materials and bonding systems to a fiber post (dt light) |
publisher |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences |
series |
Journal of Dental Medicine |
issn |
1024-641X 2008-2444 |
publishDate |
2013-10-01 |
description |
Background and Aims: Retention and stability of the post and core system is the key factor for success of final restoration . The aim of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength of the different composite core materials and bonding systems to a fiber post. Materials and Methods: To evaluate the bond strength of the composite resins to a fiber post ( DT light post) 60 posts were divided into six groups : group A: Heliomolar Flow + Seal Bond, group B: Heliomolar Flow + SE Bond , group C: Valux Plus + Seal Bond , group D: Valux Plus + SE Bond , group E: Corecem + Seal Bond, group F: Corecem + SE Bond. All samples were thermocycled for 5000 cycles (5-55 0C) and cut into four bars for the microtensile bond strength test. Failure modes were identified using a stereomicroscope. Data were analysed using One-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD post hoc test (P<0.05). Results: The interaction between composite resin materials and bonding systems were positive. The conventional hybrid composite (Valux Plus) had significantly higher bond strength compared with the core specific flowable composite (Corecem) when Seal Bond was applied as bonding agent (P<0.05). However, when SE Bond was utilized hybrid composite demonstrated significantly lower bond strength than that of other two groups (P<0.05). Conclusion: The performance of a particular composite is affected by the bonding system that is applied. A single composite resin may have different bond strength when combined with different bonding system. |
topic |
Bond strength Composite resin Bonding system |
url |
http://jdm.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-25-723&slc_lang=en&sid=1 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lelyasadighpour comparisonofthemicrotensilebondstrengthofdifferentcompositecorematerialsandbondingsystemstoafiberpostdtlight AT sousanmirmohammadrezaei comparisonofthemicrotensilebondstrengthofdifferentcompositecorematerialsandbondingsystemstoafiberpostdtlight AT hamidjalali comparisonofthemicrotensilebondstrengthofdifferentcompositecorematerialsandbondingsystemstoafiberpostdtlight AT shadabrashtak comparisonofthemicrotensilebondstrengthofdifferentcompositecorematerialsandbondingsystemstoafiberpostdtlight |
_version_ |
1725585538367356928 |