The Athlete’s Brain: Cross-Sectional Evidence for Neural Efficiency during Cycling Exercise
The “neural efficiency” hypothesis suggests that experts are characterized by a more efficient cortical function in cognitive tests. Although this hypothesis has been extended to a variety of movement-related tasks within the last years, it is unclear whether or not neural efficiency is present in c...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2016-01-01
|
Series: | Neural Plasticity |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4583674 |
id |
doaj-41467567065348389b44e2229f87b87c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-41467567065348389b44e2229f87b87c2020-11-24T22:33:43ZengHindawi LimitedNeural Plasticity2090-59041687-54432016-01-01201610.1155/2016/45836744583674The Athlete’s Brain: Cross-Sectional Evidence for Neural Efficiency during Cycling ExerciseSebastian Ludyga0Thomas Gronwald1Kuno Hottenrott2Department of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Gellertstrasse 156, 4052 Basel, SwitzerlandInstitute of Performance Diagnostics and Health Promotion, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Weinbergweg 23, 06120 Halle (Saale), GermanyInstitute of Performance Diagnostics and Health Promotion, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Weinbergweg 23, 06120 Halle (Saale), GermanyThe “neural efficiency” hypothesis suggests that experts are characterized by a more efficient cortical function in cognitive tests. Although this hypothesis has been extended to a variety of movement-related tasks within the last years, it is unclear whether or not neural efficiency is present in cyclists performing endurance exercise. Therefore, this study examined brain cortical activity at rest and during exercise between cyclists of higher (HIGH; n=14; 55.6 ± 2.8 mL/min/kg) and lower (LOW; n=15; 46.4 ± 4.1 mL/min/kg) maximal oxygen consumption (VO2MAX). Male and female participants performed a graded exercise test with spirometry to assess VO2MAX. After 3 to 5 days, EEG was recorded at rest with eyes closed and during cycling at the individual anaerobic threshold over a 30 min period. Possible differences in alpha/beta ratio as well as alpha and beta power were investigated at frontal, central, and parietal sites. The statistical analysis revealed significant differences between groups (F=12.04; p=0.002), as the alpha/beta ratio was increased in HIGH compared to LOW in both the resting state (p≤0.018) and the exercise condition (p≤0.025). The present results indicate enhanced neural efficiency in subjects with high VO2MAX, possibly due to the inhibition of task-irrelevant cognitive processes.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4583674 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sebastian Ludyga Thomas Gronwald Kuno Hottenrott |
spellingShingle |
Sebastian Ludyga Thomas Gronwald Kuno Hottenrott The Athlete’s Brain: Cross-Sectional Evidence for Neural Efficiency during Cycling Exercise Neural Plasticity |
author_facet |
Sebastian Ludyga Thomas Gronwald Kuno Hottenrott |
author_sort |
Sebastian Ludyga |
title |
The Athlete’s Brain: Cross-Sectional Evidence for Neural Efficiency during Cycling Exercise |
title_short |
The Athlete’s Brain: Cross-Sectional Evidence for Neural Efficiency during Cycling Exercise |
title_full |
The Athlete’s Brain: Cross-Sectional Evidence for Neural Efficiency during Cycling Exercise |
title_fullStr |
The Athlete’s Brain: Cross-Sectional Evidence for Neural Efficiency during Cycling Exercise |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Athlete’s Brain: Cross-Sectional Evidence for Neural Efficiency during Cycling Exercise |
title_sort |
athlete’s brain: cross-sectional evidence for neural efficiency during cycling exercise |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Neural Plasticity |
issn |
2090-5904 1687-5443 |
publishDate |
2016-01-01 |
description |
The “neural efficiency” hypothesis suggests that experts are characterized by a more efficient cortical function in cognitive tests. Although this hypothesis has been extended to a variety of movement-related tasks within the last years, it is unclear whether or not neural efficiency is present in cyclists performing endurance exercise. Therefore, this study examined brain cortical activity at rest and during exercise between cyclists of higher (HIGH; n=14; 55.6 ± 2.8 mL/min/kg) and lower (LOW; n=15; 46.4 ± 4.1 mL/min/kg) maximal oxygen consumption (VO2MAX). Male and female participants performed a graded exercise test with spirometry to assess VO2MAX. After 3 to 5 days, EEG was recorded at rest with eyes closed and during cycling at the individual anaerobic threshold over a 30 min period. Possible differences in alpha/beta ratio as well as alpha and beta power were investigated at frontal, central, and parietal sites. The statistical analysis revealed significant differences between groups (F=12.04; p=0.002), as the alpha/beta ratio was increased in HIGH compared to LOW in both the resting state (p≤0.018) and the exercise condition (p≤0.025). The present results indicate enhanced neural efficiency in subjects with high VO2MAX, possibly due to the inhibition of task-irrelevant cognitive processes. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4583674 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sebastianludyga theathletesbraincrosssectionalevidenceforneuralefficiencyduringcyclingexercise AT thomasgronwald theathletesbraincrosssectionalevidenceforneuralefficiencyduringcyclingexercise AT kunohottenrott theathletesbraincrosssectionalevidenceforneuralefficiencyduringcyclingexercise AT sebastianludyga athletesbraincrosssectionalevidenceforneuralefficiencyduringcyclingexercise AT thomasgronwald athletesbraincrosssectionalevidenceforneuralefficiencyduringcyclingexercise AT kunohottenrott athletesbraincrosssectionalevidenceforneuralefficiencyduringcyclingexercise |
_version_ |
1725729756257714176 |