The Athlete’s Brain: Cross-Sectional Evidence for Neural Efficiency during Cycling Exercise

The “neural efficiency” hypothesis suggests that experts are characterized by a more efficient cortical function in cognitive tests. Although this hypothesis has been extended to a variety of movement-related tasks within the last years, it is unclear whether or not neural efficiency is present in c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sebastian Ludyga, Thomas Gronwald, Kuno Hottenrott
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2016-01-01
Series:Neural Plasticity
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4583674
id doaj-41467567065348389b44e2229f87b87c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-41467567065348389b44e2229f87b87c2020-11-24T22:33:43ZengHindawi LimitedNeural Plasticity2090-59041687-54432016-01-01201610.1155/2016/45836744583674The Athlete’s Brain: Cross-Sectional Evidence for Neural Efficiency during Cycling ExerciseSebastian Ludyga0Thomas Gronwald1Kuno Hottenrott2Department of Sport, Exercise and Health, University of Basel, Gellertstrasse 156, 4052 Basel, SwitzerlandInstitute of Performance Diagnostics and Health Promotion, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Weinbergweg 23, 06120 Halle (Saale), GermanyInstitute of Performance Diagnostics and Health Promotion, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Weinbergweg 23, 06120 Halle (Saale), GermanyThe “neural efficiency” hypothesis suggests that experts are characterized by a more efficient cortical function in cognitive tests. Although this hypothesis has been extended to a variety of movement-related tasks within the last years, it is unclear whether or not neural efficiency is present in cyclists performing endurance exercise. Therefore, this study examined brain cortical activity at rest and during exercise between cyclists of higher (HIGH; n=14; 55.6 ± 2.8 mL/min/kg) and lower (LOW; n=15; 46.4 ± 4.1 mL/min/kg) maximal oxygen consumption (VO2MAX). Male and female participants performed a graded exercise test with spirometry to assess VO2MAX. After 3 to 5 days, EEG was recorded at rest with eyes closed and during cycling at the individual anaerobic threshold over a 30 min period. Possible differences in alpha/beta ratio as well as alpha and beta power were investigated at frontal, central, and parietal sites. The statistical analysis revealed significant differences between groups (F=12.04; p=0.002), as the alpha/beta ratio was increased in HIGH compared to LOW in both the resting state (p≤0.018) and the exercise condition (p≤0.025). The present results indicate enhanced neural efficiency in subjects with high VO2MAX, possibly due to the inhibition of task-irrelevant cognitive processes.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4583674
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sebastian Ludyga
Thomas Gronwald
Kuno Hottenrott
spellingShingle Sebastian Ludyga
Thomas Gronwald
Kuno Hottenrott
The Athlete’s Brain: Cross-Sectional Evidence for Neural Efficiency during Cycling Exercise
Neural Plasticity
author_facet Sebastian Ludyga
Thomas Gronwald
Kuno Hottenrott
author_sort Sebastian Ludyga
title The Athlete’s Brain: Cross-Sectional Evidence for Neural Efficiency during Cycling Exercise
title_short The Athlete’s Brain: Cross-Sectional Evidence for Neural Efficiency during Cycling Exercise
title_full The Athlete’s Brain: Cross-Sectional Evidence for Neural Efficiency during Cycling Exercise
title_fullStr The Athlete’s Brain: Cross-Sectional Evidence for Neural Efficiency during Cycling Exercise
title_full_unstemmed The Athlete’s Brain: Cross-Sectional Evidence for Neural Efficiency during Cycling Exercise
title_sort athlete’s brain: cross-sectional evidence for neural efficiency during cycling exercise
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Neural Plasticity
issn 2090-5904
1687-5443
publishDate 2016-01-01
description The “neural efficiency” hypothesis suggests that experts are characterized by a more efficient cortical function in cognitive tests. Although this hypothesis has been extended to a variety of movement-related tasks within the last years, it is unclear whether or not neural efficiency is present in cyclists performing endurance exercise. Therefore, this study examined brain cortical activity at rest and during exercise between cyclists of higher (HIGH; n=14; 55.6 ± 2.8 mL/min/kg) and lower (LOW; n=15; 46.4 ± 4.1 mL/min/kg) maximal oxygen consumption (VO2MAX). Male and female participants performed a graded exercise test with spirometry to assess VO2MAX. After 3 to 5 days, EEG was recorded at rest with eyes closed and during cycling at the individual anaerobic threshold over a 30 min period. Possible differences in alpha/beta ratio as well as alpha and beta power were investigated at frontal, central, and parietal sites. The statistical analysis revealed significant differences between groups (F=12.04; p=0.002), as the alpha/beta ratio was increased in HIGH compared to LOW in both the resting state (p≤0.018) and the exercise condition (p≤0.025). The present results indicate enhanced neural efficiency in subjects with high VO2MAX, possibly due to the inhibition of task-irrelevant cognitive processes.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4583674
work_keys_str_mv AT sebastianludyga theathletesbraincrosssectionalevidenceforneuralefficiencyduringcyclingexercise
AT thomasgronwald theathletesbraincrosssectionalevidenceforneuralefficiencyduringcyclingexercise
AT kunohottenrott theathletesbraincrosssectionalevidenceforneuralefficiencyduringcyclingexercise
AT sebastianludyga athletesbraincrosssectionalevidenceforneuralefficiencyduringcyclingexercise
AT thomasgronwald athletesbraincrosssectionalevidenceforneuralefficiencyduringcyclingexercise
AT kunohottenrott athletesbraincrosssectionalevidenceforneuralefficiencyduringcyclingexercise
_version_ 1725729756257714176