Outcomes With a Self-Fitting Hearing Aid
Self-fitting hearing aids (SFHAs)—devices that enable self-directed threshold measurements leading to a prescribed hearing aid (HA) setting, and fine-tuning, without the need for professional support—are now commercially available. This study examined outcomes obtained with one commercial SFHA, the...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2018-04-01
|
Series: | Trends in Hearing |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216518768958 |
id |
doaj-4136b878323444909edbc2d5b6eb0087 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4136b878323444909edbc2d5b6eb00872020-11-25T03:45:17ZengSAGE PublishingTrends in Hearing2331-21652018-04-012210.1177/2331216518768958Outcomes With a Self-Fitting Hearing AidGitte KeidserElizabeth ConverySelf-fitting hearing aids (SFHAs)—devices that enable self-directed threshold measurements leading to a prescribed hearing aid (HA) setting, and fine-tuning, without the need for professional support—are now commercially available. This study examined outcomes obtained with one commercial SFHA, the Companion (SoundWorld Solutions), when support was available from a clinical assistant during self-fitting. Participants consisted of 27 experienced and 25 new HA users who completed the self-fitting process, resulting in 38 user-driven and 14 clinician-driven fittings. Following 12 weeks’ experience with the SFHAs in the field, outcomes measured included the following: coupler gain and output, HA handling and management skills, speech recognition in noise, and self-reported benefit and satisfaction. In addition, the conventionally fitted HAs of 22 of the experienced participants who had user-driven fittings were evaluated. Irrespective of HA experience, the type of fitting (user- or clinician-driven) had no significant effect on coupler gain, speech recognition scores, or self-reported benefit and satisfaction. Users selected significantly higher low-frequency gain in the SFHAs when compared with the conventionally fitted HAs. The conventionally fitted HAs were rated significantly higher for benefit and satisfaction on some subscales due to negative issues with the physical design and implementation of the SFHAs, rather than who drove the fitting process. Poorer cognitive function was associated with poorer handling and management of the SFHAs. Findings suggest that with the right design and support, SFHAs may be a viable option to improve the accessibility of hearing health care.https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216518768958 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Gitte Keidser Elizabeth Convery |
spellingShingle |
Gitte Keidser Elizabeth Convery Outcomes With a Self-Fitting Hearing Aid Trends in Hearing |
author_facet |
Gitte Keidser Elizabeth Convery |
author_sort |
Gitte Keidser |
title |
Outcomes With a Self-Fitting Hearing Aid |
title_short |
Outcomes With a Self-Fitting Hearing Aid |
title_full |
Outcomes With a Self-Fitting Hearing Aid |
title_fullStr |
Outcomes With a Self-Fitting Hearing Aid |
title_full_unstemmed |
Outcomes With a Self-Fitting Hearing Aid |
title_sort |
outcomes with a self-fitting hearing aid |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Trends in Hearing |
issn |
2331-2165 |
publishDate |
2018-04-01 |
description |
Self-fitting hearing aids (SFHAs)—devices that enable self-directed threshold measurements leading to a prescribed hearing aid (HA) setting, and fine-tuning, without the need for professional support—are now commercially available. This study examined outcomes obtained with one commercial SFHA, the Companion (SoundWorld Solutions), when support was available from a clinical assistant during self-fitting. Participants consisted of 27 experienced and 25 new HA users who completed the self-fitting process, resulting in 38 user-driven and 14 clinician-driven fittings. Following 12 weeks’ experience with the SFHAs in the field, outcomes measured included the following: coupler gain and output, HA handling and management skills, speech recognition in noise, and self-reported benefit and satisfaction. In addition, the conventionally fitted HAs of 22 of the experienced participants who had user-driven fittings were evaluated. Irrespective of HA experience, the type of fitting (user- or clinician-driven) had no significant effect on coupler gain, speech recognition scores, or self-reported benefit and satisfaction. Users selected significantly higher low-frequency gain in the SFHAs when compared with the conventionally fitted HAs. The conventionally fitted HAs were rated significantly higher for benefit and satisfaction on some subscales due to negative issues with the physical design and implementation of the SFHAs, rather than who drove the fitting process. Poorer cognitive function was associated with poorer handling and management of the SFHAs. Findings suggest that with the right design and support, SFHAs may be a viable option to improve the accessibility of hearing health care. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216518768958 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gittekeidser outcomeswithaselffittinghearingaid AT elizabethconvery outcomeswithaselffittinghearingaid |
_version_ |
1724510433592737792 |