Outcomes With a Self-Fitting Hearing Aid

Self-fitting hearing aids (SFHAs)—devices that enable self-directed threshold measurements leading to a prescribed hearing aid (HA) setting, and fine-tuning, without the need for professional support—are now commercially available. This study examined outcomes obtained with one commercial SFHA, the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gitte Keidser, Elizabeth Convery
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2018-04-01
Series:Trends in Hearing
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216518768958
id doaj-4136b878323444909edbc2d5b6eb0087
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4136b878323444909edbc2d5b6eb00872020-11-25T03:45:17ZengSAGE PublishingTrends in Hearing2331-21652018-04-012210.1177/2331216518768958Outcomes With a Self-Fitting Hearing AidGitte KeidserElizabeth ConverySelf-fitting hearing aids (SFHAs)—devices that enable self-directed threshold measurements leading to a prescribed hearing aid (HA) setting, and fine-tuning, without the need for professional support—are now commercially available. This study examined outcomes obtained with one commercial SFHA, the Companion (SoundWorld Solutions), when support was available from a clinical assistant during self-fitting. Participants consisted of 27 experienced and 25 new HA users who completed the self-fitting process, resulting in 38 user-driven and 14 clinician-driven fittings. Following 12 weeks’ experience with the SFHAs in the field, outcomes measured included the following: coupler gain and output, HA handling and management skills, speech recognition in noise, and self-reported benefit and satisfaction. In addition, the conventionally fitted HAs of 22 of the experienced participants who had user-driven fittings were evaluated. Irrespective of HA experience, the type of fitting (user- or clinician-driven) had no significant effect on coupler gain, speech recognition scores, or self-reported benefit and satisfaction. Users selected significantly higher low-frequency gain in the SFHAs when compared with the conventionally fitted HAs. The conventionally fitted HAs were rated significantly higher for benefit and satisfaction on some subscales due to negative issues with the physical design and implementation of the SFHAs, rather than who drove the fitting process. Poorer cognitive function was associated with poorer handling and management of the SFHAs. Findings suggest that with the right design and support, SFHAs may be a viable option to improve the accessibility of hearing health care.https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216518768958
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gitte Keidser
Elizabeth Convery
spellingShingle Gitte Keidser
Elizabeth Convery
Outcomes With a Self-Fitting Hearing Aid
Trends in Hearing
author_facet Gitte Keidser
Elizabeth Convery
author_sort Gitte Keidser
title Outcomes With a Self-Fitting Hearing Aid
title_short Outcomes With a Self-Fitting Hearing Aid
title_full Outcomes With a Self-Fitting Hearing Aid
title_fullStr Outcomes With a Self-Fitting Hearing Aid
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes With a Self-Fitting Hearing Aid
title_sort outcomes with a self-fitting hearing aid
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Trends in Hearing
issn 2331-2165
publishDate 2018-04-01
description Self-fitting hearing aids (SFHAs)—devices that enable self-directed threshold measurements leading to a prescribed hearing aid (HA) setting, and fine-tuning, without the need for professional support—are now commercially available. This study examined outcomes obtained with one commercial SFHA, the Companion (SoundWorld Solutions), when support was available from a clinical assistant during self-fitting. Participants consisted of 27 experienced and 25 new HA users who completed the self-fitting process, resulting in 38 user-driven and 14 clinician-driven fittings. Following 12 weeks’ experience with the SFHAs in the field, outcomes measured included the following: coupler gain and output, HA handling and management skills, speech recognition in noise, and self-reported benefit and satisfaction. In addition, the conventionally fitted HAs of 22 of the experienced participants who had user-driven fittings were evaluated. Irrespective of HA experience, the type of fitting (user- or clinician-driven) had no significant effect on coupler gain, speech recognition scores, or self-reported benefit and satisfaction. Users selected significantly higher low-frequency gain in the SFHAs when compared with the conventionally fitted HAs. The conventionally fitted HAs were rated significantly higher for benefit and satisfaction on some subscales due to negative issues with the physical design and implementation of the SFHAs, rather than who drove the fitting process. Poorer cognitive function was associated with poorer handling and management of the SFHAs. Findings suggest that with the right design and support, SFHAs may be a viable option to improve the accessibility of hearing health care.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216518768958
work_keys_str_mv AT gittekeidser outcomeswithaselffittinghearingaid
AT elizabethconvery outcomeswithaselffittinghearingaid
_version_ 1724510433592737792