Assessment of satisfaction and anxiety levels of the patients who had cesarean section with general and spinal anesthesia

The primary aim in our study is to obtain the most objective result by comparing the anesthesia satisfaction of women who had cesarean section both under general and spinal anesthesia. Our secondary aim is to assess the relation between patients preference of anesthesia technique and anxiety level....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Basak Altiparmak, Sezen Bozkurt Koseoglu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Society of TURAZ AKADEMI 2017-06-01
Series:Medicine Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ejmanager.com/fulltextpdf.php?mno=241247
id doaj-4132585eb6854f3cb82d56bfdf9e3574
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4132585eb6854f3cb82d56bfdf9e35742020-11-24T21:24:57ZengSociety of TURAZ AKADEMI Medicine Science2147-06342017-06-01622293210.5455/medscience.2016.05.8544241247Assessment of satisfaction and anxiety levels of the patients who had cesarean section with general and spinal anesthesiaBasak Altiparmak0Sezen Bozkurt Koseoglu1Mugla Sitki Kocman Universitesi Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi, Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Klinigi Mugla Sitki Kocman Universitesi Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi, Kadin Hastaliklari ve Dogum KlinigiThe primary aim in our study is to obtain the most objective result by comparing the anesthesia satisfaction of women who had cesarean section both under general and spinal anesthesia. Our secondary aim is to assess the relation between patients preference of anesthesia technique and anxiety level. Total number of 94 ASA II women who hadcesarean section under general anesthesia within 5 years and scheduled to have elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia, were included into the study. After 48 hours, all of the patients were asked to compare their previous general anesthesia experience with spinal anesthesia in regard of satisfaction and anxiety. Satisfaction scores were as bad, average, good, very good while patients were asked to use numbers from 1 to 10 to score their anxiety level. The mean age of the patients was 26.1±4.5 when they had general anesthesia and it was 29.7±4.6 when they had spinal anesthesia. When the satisfaction scores of anesthesia techniques were compared, spinal anesthesia was found to be statistically significantly high (p0.05). The patients who had cesarean section under both of the anesthesia techniques were more satisfied by spinal anesthesia. While no difference was found between preoperative anxiety levels. [Med-Science 2017; 6(2.000): 229-32]http://www.ejmanager.com/fulltextpdf.php?mno=241247General anesthesiasatisfactioncesareanspinal
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Basak Altiparmak
Sezen Bozkurt Koseoglu
spellingShingle Basak Altiparmak
Sezen Bozkurt Koseoglu
Assessment of satisfaction and anxiety levels of the patients who had cesarean section with general and spinal anesthesia
Medicine Science
General anesthesia
satisfaction
cesarean
spinal
author_facet Basak Altiparmak
Sezen Bozkurt Koseoglu
author_sort Basak Altiparmak
title Assessment of satisfaction and anxiety levels of the patients who had cesarean section with general and spinal anesthesia
title_short Assessment of satisfaction and anxiety levels of the patients who had cesarean section with general and spinal anesthesia
title_full Assessment of satisfaction and anxiety levels of the patients who had cesarean section with general and spinal anesthesia
title_fullStr Assessment of satisfaction and anxiety levels of the patients who had cesarean section with general and spinal anesthesia
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of satisfaction and anxiety levels of the patients who had cesarean section with general and spinal anesthesia
title_sort assessment of satisfaction and anxiety levels of the patients who had cesarean section with general and spinal anesthesia
publisher Society of TURAZ AKADEMI
series Medicine Science
issn 2147-0634
publishDate 2017-06-01
description The primary aim in our study is to obtain the most objective result by comparing the anesthesia satisfaction of women who had cesarean section both under general and spinal anesthesia. Our secondary aim is to assess the relation between patients preference of anesthesia technique and anxiety level. Total number of 94 ASA II women who hadcesarean section under general anesthesia within 5 years and scheduled to have elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia, were included into the study. After 48 hours, all of the patients were asked to compare their previous general anesthesia experience with spinal anesthesia in regard of satisfaction and anxiety. Satisfaction scores were as bad, average, good, very good while patients were asked to use numbers from 1 to 10 to score their anxiety level. The mean age of the patients was 26.1±4.5 when they had general anesthesia and it was 29.7±4.6 when they had spinal anesthesia. When the satisfaction scores of anesthesia techniques were compared, spinal anesthesia was found to be statistically significantly high (p0.05). The patients who had cesarean section under both of the anesthesia techniques were more satisfied by spinal anesthesia. While no difference was found between preoperative anxiety levels. [Med-Science 2017; 6(2.000): 229-32]
topic General anesthesia
satisfaction
cesarean
spinal
url http://www.ejmanager.com/fulltextpdf.php?mno=241247
work_keys_str_mv AT basakaltiparmak assessmentofsatisfactionandanxietylevelsofthepatientswhohadcesareansectionwithgeneralandspinalanesthesia
AT sezenbozkurtkoseoglu assessmentofsatisfactionandanxietylevelsofthepatientswhohadcesareansectionwithgeneralandspinalanesthesia
_version_ 1725985867677302784