Exempting low-risk health and medical research from ethics reviews: comparing Australia, the United Kingdom, the United States and the Netherlands
Abstract Background Disproportionate regulation of health and medical research contributes to research waste. Better understanding of exemptions of research from ethics review in different jurisdictions may help to guide modification of review processes and reduce research waste. Our aim was to iden...
Main Authors: | Anna Mae Scott, Simon Kolstoe, M. C. ( Corrette) Ploem, Zoë Hammatt, Paul Glasziou |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Health Research Policy and Systems |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0520-4 |
Similar Items
-
Measuring inconsistency in research ethics committee review
by: Samantha Trace, et al.
Published: (2017-11-01) -
Ethical assessment of research protocols: the experience of the Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein (HIAE)
by: Sonia Maria Oliveira de Barros, et al.
Published: (2005-03-01) -
Ethical concerns in suicide research: thematic analysis of the views of human research ethics committees in Australia
by: Emma Barnard, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01) -
Reasons for resubmission of research projects to the research ethics committee of a University Hospital in São Paulo, Brazil
by: Mariana Bueno, et al.
Published: (2009-01-01) -
Challenges and proposed solutions in making clinical research on COVID-19 ethical: a status quo analysis across German research ethics committees
by: Alice Faust, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01)