International experience in determining the cost-effectiveness thresholds

The article reviews international methodological guidelines, regulatory documents and existing approaches to the determination of the costeffectiveness threshold (CeT), also known as the willingness-to-pay threshold (WTP), the threshold value of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICeR), in eu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: T. P. Bezdenezhnykh, N. Z. Musina, V. K. Fedyaeva, T. S. Tepcova, V. A. Lemeshko, V. V. Omelyanovsky
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: IRBIS LLC 2019-01-01
Series:Фармакоэкономика
Subjects:
wtp
lyg
Online Access:https://www.pharmacoeconomics.ru/jour/article/view/273
id doaj-411f82ed62f849f89ce7b76edc6cc21c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-411f82ed62f849f89ce7b76edc6cc21c2021-07-28T13:30:41ZrusIRBIS LLCФармакоэкономика2070-49092070-49332019-01-01114738010.17749/2070-4909.2018.11.4.073-080248International experience in determining the cost-effectiveness thresholdsT. P. Bezdenezhnykh0N. Z. Musina1V. K. Fedyaeva2T. S. Tepcova3V. A. Lemeshko4V. V. Omelyanovsky5Center for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control of the Ministry of Health of the Russian FederationCenter for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; Research Financial Institution of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, Federal State Budget Institution; I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of RussiaCenter for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; Research Financial Institution of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, Federal State Budget InstitutionCenter for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of RussiaCenter for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of RussiaCenter for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; Research Financial Institution of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, Federal State Budget InstitutionThe article reviews international methodological guidelines, regulatory documents and existing approaches to the determination of the costeffectiveness threshold (CeT), also known as the willingness-to-pay threshold (WTP), the threshold value of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICeR), in europe (england and Wales, Scotland, Ireland, France, Belgium, Denmark, the netherlands, Germany, Sweden, Finland, norway, Poland), America (the USA, Canada, Brazil), Asia (Japan, South korea, Taiwan, Thailand), in Australia and new Zealand. The CeT is commonly used to rationalize decision-making in health cost reimbursement. The present review demonstrates that just a few countries (englandandWales,Thailand,Poland,USA) have introduced the explicit value of CeT into their decision making. Some countries (Australia,Canada,new Zealand, thenetherlands,Sweden, andBrazil) use CeT in an implicit manner implying that no specific CeT value is defined by law. In other countries (Finland,Sweden,norway,France,Germany,Denmark,Japan,South korea,Taiwan), the role of the threshold in health reimbursement remains uncertain despite the presence of HTA systems. The CeT is expressed as additional cost per unit of incremental health benefit, which is represented by quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in most counties. However,PolandandBrazilallow using life years gained (LYG) as a measure of additional benefit neglecting the quality of life. In thenetherlandsandengland, different CeT values are applied to the health technology under assessment depending on the severity or rareness of the disease and some other factors.https://www.pharmacoeconomics.ru/jour/article/view/273threshold value of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratiothe willingness to pay thresholdyear of saved lifeyear of saved quality lifethreshold value of economic efficiencywtpicerqalylyg
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author T. P. Bezdenezhnykh
N. Z. Musina
V. K. Fedyaeva
T. S. Tepcova
V. A. Lemeshko
V. V. Omelyanovsky
spellingShingle T. P. Bezdenezhnykh
N. Z. Musina
V. K. Fedyaeva
T. S. Tepcova
V. A. Lemeshko
V. V. Omelyanovsky
International experience in determining the cost-effectiveness thresholds
Фармакоэкономика
threshold value of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio
the willingness to pay threshold
year of saved life
year of saved quality life
threshold value of economic efficiency
wtp
icer
qaly
lyg
author_facet T. P. Bezdenezhnykh
N. Z. Musina
V. K. Fedyaeva
T. S. Tepcova
V. A. Lemeshko
V. V. Omelyanovsky
author_sort T. P. Bezdenezhnykh
title International experience in determining the cost-effectiveness thresholds
title_short International experience in determining the cost-effectiveness thresholds
title_full International experience in determining the cost-effectiveness thresholds
title_fullStr International experience in determining the cost-effectiveness thresholds
title_full_unstemmed International experience in determining the cost-effectiveness thresholds
title_sort international experience in determining the cost-effectiveness thresholds
publisher IRBIS LLC
series Фармакоэкономика
issn 2070-4909
2070-4933
publishDate 2019-01-01
description The article reviews international methodological guidelines, regulatory documents and existing approaches to the determination of the costeffectiveness threshold (CeT), also known as the willingness-to-pay threshold (WTP), the threshold value of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICeR), in europe (england and Wales, Scotland, Ireland, France, Belgium, Denmark, the netherlands, Germany, Sweden, Finland, norway, Poland), America (the USA, Canada, Brazil), Asia (Japan, South korea, Taiwan, Thailand), in Australia and new Zealand. The CeT is commonly used to rationalize decision-making in health cost reimbursement. The present review demonstrates that just a few countries (englandandWales,Thailand,Poland,USA) have introduced the explicit value of CeT into their decision making. Some countries (Australia,Canada,new Zealand, thenetherlands,Sweden, andBrazil) use CeT in an implicit manner implying that no specific CeT value is defined by law. In other countries (Finland,Sweden,norway,France,Germany,Denmark,Japan,South korea,Taiwan), the role of the threshold in health reimbursement remains uncertain despite the presence of HTA systems. The CeT is expressed as additional cost per unit of incremental health benefit, which is represented by quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in most counties. However,PolandandBrazilallow using life years gained (LYG) as a measure of additional benefit neglecting the quality of life. In thenetherlandsandengland, different CeT values are applied to the health technology under assessment depending on the severity or rareness of the disease and some other factors.
topic threshold value of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio
the willingness to pay threshold
year of saved life
year of saved quality life
threshold value of economic efficiency
wtp
icer
qaly
lyg
url https://www.pharmacoeconomics.ru/jour/article/view/273
work_keys_str_mv AT tpbezdenezhnykh internationalexperienceindeterminingthecosteffectivenessthresholds
AT nzmusina internationalexperienceindeterminingthecosteffectivenessthresholds
AT vkfedyaeva internationalexperienceindeterminingthecosteffectivenessthresholds
AT tstepcova internationalexperienceindeterminingthecosteffectivenessthresholds
AT valemeshko internationalexperienceindeterminingthecosteffectivenessthresholds
AT vvomelyanovsky internationalexperienceindeterminingthecosteffectivenessthresholds
_version_ 1721273234659213312