International experience in determining the cost-effectiveness thresholds
The article reviews international methodological guidelines, regulatory documents and existing approaches to the determination of the costeffectiveness threshold (CeT), also known as the willingness-to-pay threshold (WTP), the threshold value of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICeR), in eu...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Russian |
Published: |
IRBIS LLC
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Фармакоэкономика |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.pharmacoeconomics.ru/jour/article/view/273 |
id |
doaj-411f82ed62f849f89ce7b76edc6cc21c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-411f82ed62f849f89ce7b76edc6cc21c2021-07-28T13:30:41ZrusIRBIS LLCФармакоэкономика2070-49092070-49332019-01-01114738010.17749/2070-4909.2018.11.4.073-080248International experience in determining the cost-effectiveness thresholdsT. P. Bezdenezhnykh0N. Z. Musina1V. K. Fedyaeva2T. S. Tepcova3V. A. Lemeshko4V. V. Omelyanovsky5Center for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control of the Ministry of Health of the Russian FederationCenter for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; Research Financial Institution of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, Federal State Budget Institution; I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of RussiaCenter for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; Research Financial Institution of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, Federal State Budget InstitutionCenter for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of RussiaCenter for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of RussiaCenter for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; Research Financial Institution of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, Federal State Budget InstitutionThe article reviews international methodological guidelines, regulatory documents and existing approaches to the determination of the costeffectiveness threshold (CeT), also known as the willingness-to-pay threshold (WTP), the threshold value of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICeR), in europe (england and Wales, Scotland, Ireland, France, Belgium, Denmark, the netherlands, Germany, Sweden, Finland, norway, Poland), America (the USA, Canada, Brazil), Asia (Japan, South korea, Taiwan, Thailand), in Australia and new Zealand. The CeT is commonly used to rationalize decision-making in health cost reimbursement. The present review demonstrates that just a few countries (englandandWales,Thailand,Poland,USA) have introduced the explicit value of CeT into their decision making. Some countries (Australia,Canada,new Zealand, thenetherlands,Sweden, andBrazil) use CeT in an implicit manner implying that no specific CeT value is defined by law. In other countries (Finland,Sweden,norway,France,Germany,Denmark,Japan,South korea,Taiwan), the role of the threshold in health reimbursement remains uncertain despite the presence of HTA systems. The CeT is expressed as additional cost per unit of incremental health benefit, which is represented by quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in most counties. However,PolandandBrazilallow using life years gained (LYG) as a measure of additional benefit neglecting the quality of life. In thenetherlandsandengland, different CeT values are applied to the health technology under assessment depending on the severity or rareness of the disease and some other factors.https://www.pharmacoeconomics.ru/jour/article/view/273threshold value of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratiothe willingness to pay thresholdyear of saved lifeyear of saved quality lifethreshold value of economic efficiencywtpicerqalylyg |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Russian |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
T. P. Bezdenezhnykh N. Z. Musina V. K. Fedyaeva T. S. Tepcova V. A. Lemeshko V. V. Omelyanovsky |
spellingShingle |
T. P. Bezdenezhnykh N. Z. Musina V. K. Fedyaeva T. S. Tepcova V. A. Lemeshko V. V. Omelyanovsky International experience in determining the cost-effectiveness thresholds Фармакоэкономика threshold value of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio the willingness to pay threshold year of saved life year of saved quality life threshold value of economic efficiency wtp icer qaly lyg |
author_facet |
T. P. Bezdenezhnykh N. Z. Musina V. K. Fedyaeva T. S. Tepcova V. A. Lemeshko V. V. Omelyanovsky |
author_sort |
T. P. Bezdenezhnykh |
title |
International experience in determining the cost-effectiveness thresholds |
title_short |
International experience in determining the cost-effectiveness thresholds |
title_full |
International experience in determining the cost-effectiveness thresholds |
title_fullStr |
International experience in determining the cost-effectiveness thresholds |
title_full_unstemmed |
International experience in determining the cost-effectiveness thresholds |
title_sort |
international experience in determining the cost-effectiveness thresholds |
publisher |
IRBIS LLC |
series |
Фармакоэкономика |
issn |
2070-4909 2070-4933 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
The article reviews international methodological guidelines, regulatory documents and existing approaches to the determination of the costeffectiveness threshold (CeT), also known as the willingness-to-pay threshold (WTP), the threshold value of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICeR), in europe (england and Wales, Scotland, Ireland, France, Belgium, Denmark, the netherlands, Germany, Sweden, Finland, norway, Poland), America (the USA, Canada, Brazil), Asia (Japan, South korea, Taiwan, Thailand), in Australia and new Zealand. The CeT is commonly used to rationalize decision-making in health cost reimbursement. The present review demonstrates that just a few countries (englandandWales,Thailand,Poland,USA) have introduced the explicit value of CeT into their decision making. Some countries (Australia,Canada,new Zealand, thenetherlands,Sweden, andBrazil) use CeT in an implicit manner implying that no specific CeT value is defined by law. In other countries (Finland,Sweden,norway,France,Germany,Denmark,Japan,South korea,Taiwan), the role of the threshold in health reimbursement remains uncertain despite the presence of HTA systems. The CeT is expressed as additional cost per unit of incremental health benefit, which is represented by quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in most counties. However,PolandandBrazilallow using life years gained (LYG) as a measure of additional benefit neglecting the quality of life. In thenetherlandsandengland, different CeT values are applied to the health technology under assessment depending on the severity or rareness of the disease and some other factors. |
topic |
threshold value of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio the willingness to pay threshold year of saved life year of saved quality life threshold value of economic efficiency wtp icer qaly lyg |
url |
https://www.pharmacoeconomics.ru/jour/article/view/273 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT tpbezdenezhnykh internationalexperienceindeterminingthecosteffectivenessthresholds AT nzmusina internationalexperienceindeterminingthecosteffectivenessthresholds AT vkfedyaeva internationalexperienceindeterminingthecosteffectivenessthresholds AT tstepcova internationalexperienceindeterminingthecosteffectivenessthresholds AT valemeshko internationalexperienceindeterminingthecosteffectivenessthresholds AT vvomelyanovsky internationalexperienceindeterminingthecosteffectivenessthresholds |
_version_ |
1721273234659213312 |