Australia’s overseas development aid commitment to health through the sustainable development goals: a multi-stakeholder perspective
Abstract Background In 2018, the Australian Government, through a Senate-led Parliamentary Inquiry, sought the views of diverse stakeholders on Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) implementation both domestically and as part of Australia’s Overseas Development Assistance (ODA) program. One hundred an...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2019-11-01
|
Series: | Globalization and Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12992-019-0507-5 |
id |
doaj-4103d0707a4444c587adcaa452f665c1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4103d0707a4444c587adcaa452f665c12020-11-25T04:02:59ZengBMCGlobalization and Health1744-86032019-11-0115111910.1186/s12992-019-0507-5Australia’s overseas development aid commitment to health through the sustainable development goals: a multi-stakeholder perspectiveClaire E. Brolan0Christopher A. McEwan1Peter S. Hill2Centre for Policy Futures, The University of QueenslandCentre for Policy Futures, The University of QueenslandSchool of Public Health, The University of QueenslandAbstract Background In 2018, the Australian Government, through a Senate-led Parliamentary Inquiry, sought the views of diverse stakeholders on Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) implementation both domestically and as part of Australia’s Overseas Development Assistance (ODA) program. One hundred and sixty-four written submissions were received. The submissions offered perspective and guidance from a rich cross-section of those involved, and with keen interest in, Australia’s ODA-SDG commitment. This article identifies and explores the submissions to that Inquiry which placed impetus on Australia’s ODA-SDG and health and development nexus. It then compares how the synthesized views, concerns and priorities of selected Inquiry stakeholders align with and reflect the Australian Government’s treatment of SDG 3 in its SDG Voluntary National Review (VNR), as well as with the final Inquiry report summarizing submission content. Results Four key themes were synthesized and drawn from the thirty-one stakeholder submissions included in our analysis. Disconnect was then found to exist between the selected stakeholder views and the Australian Government’s SDG-VNR’s treatment of SDG 3, as well as with the content of the Parliamentary Inquiry’s final report with respect to the ODA-SDG and health and development nexus. Conclusions We situate the findings of our analysis within the wider strategic context of the Australian Government’s policy commitment to “step up” in the Pacific region. This research provides an insight into both multi-stakeholder and Federal Government views on ODA in the Indo-Pacific region, especially at a time when Australia’s Pacific engagement has come to the forefront of both foreign and security policy. We conclude that the SDG agenda, including the SDG health and development agenda, could offer a unique vehicle for enabling a paradigm shift in the Australian Government’s development approach toward the Pacific region and its diverse peoples. This potential is strongly reflected in stakeholder perspectives included in our analysis. However, study findings remind that the political determinants of health, and overlapping political determinants of SDG achievement, will be instrumental in the coming decade, and that stakeholders from different sectors need to be genuinely engaged in SDG-ODA policy-related decision-making and planning by governments in both developed and developing countries alike.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12992-019-0507-5Sustainable development goalsSDGsSDG 3Health and developmentAustraliaOverseas development aid |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Claire E. Brolan Christopher A. McEwan Peter S. Hill |
spellingShingle |
Claire E. Brolan Christopher A. McEwan Peter S. Hill Australia’s overseas development aid commitment to health through the sustainable development goals: a multi-stakeholder perspective Globalization and Health Sustainable development goals SDGs SDG 3 Health and development Australia Overseas development aid |
author_facet |
Claire E. Brolan Christopher A. McEwan Peter S. Hill |
author_sort |
Claire E. Brolan |
title |
Australia’s overseas development aid commitment to health through the sustainable development goals: a multi-stakeholder perspective |
title_short |
Australia’s overseas development aid commitment to health through the sustainable development goals: a multi-stakeholder perspective |
title_full |
Australia’s overseas development aid commitment to health through the sustainable development goals: a multi-stakeholder perspective |
title_fullStr |
Australia’s overseas development aid commitment to health through the sustainable development goals: a multi-stakeholder perspective |
title_full_unstemmed |
Australia’s overseas development aid commitment to health through the sustainable development goals: a multi-stakeholder perspective |
title_sort |
australia’s overseas development aid commitment to health through the sustainable development goals: a multi-stakeholder perspective |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Globalization and Health |
issn |
1744-8603 |
publishDate |
2019-11-01 |
description |
Abstract Background In 2018, the Australian Government, through a Senate-led Parliamentary Inquiry, sought the views of diverse stakeholders on Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) implementation both domestically and as part of Australia’s Overseas Development Assistance (ODA) program. One hundred and sixty-four written submissions were received. The submissions offered perspective and guidance from a rich cross-section of those involved, and with keen interest in, Australia’s ODA-SDG commitment. This article identifies and explores the submissions to that Inquiry which placed impetus on Australia’s ODA-SDG and health and development nexus. It then compares how the synthesized views, concerns and priorities of selected Inquiry stakeholders align with and reflect the Australian Government’s treatment of SDG 3 in its SDG Voluntary National Review (VNR), as well as with the final Inquiry report summarizing submission content. Results Four key themes were synthesized and drawn from the thirty-one stakeholder submissions included in our analysis. Disconnect was then found to exist between the selected stakeholder views and the Australian Government’s SDG-VNR’s treatment of SDG 3, as well as with the content of the Parliamentary Inquiry’s final report with respect to the ODA-SDG and health and development nexus. Conclusions We situate the findings of our analysis within the wider strategic context of the Australian Government’s policy commitment to “step up” in the Pacific region. This research provides an insight into both multi-stakeholder and Federal Government views on ODA in the Indo-Pacific region, especially at a time when Australia’s Pacific engagement has come to the forefront of both foreign and security policy. We conclude that the SDG agenda, including the SDG health and development agenda, could offer a unique vehicle for enabling a paradigm shift in the Australian Government’s development approach toward the Pacific region and its diverse peoples. This potential is strongly reflected in stakeholder perspectives included in our analysis. However, study findings remind that the political determinants of health, and overlapping political determinants of SDG achievement, will be instrumental in the coming decade, and that stakeholders from different sectors need to be genuinely engaged in SDG-ODA policy-related decision-making and planning by governments in both developed and developing countries alike. |
topic |
Sustainable development goals SDGs SDG 3 Health and development Australia Overseas development aid |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12992-019-0507-5 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT claireebrolan australiasoverseasdevelopmentaidcommitmenttohealththroughthesustainabledevelopmentgoalsamultistakeholderperspective AT christopheramcewan australiasoverseasdevelopmentaidcommitmenttohealththroughthesustainabledevelopmentgoalsamultistakeholderperspective AT petershill australiasoverseasdevelopmentaidcommitmenttohealththroughthesustainabledevelopmentgoalsamultistakeholderperspective |
_version_ |
1724441409856995328 |