What Form of Mathematics are Assessments Assessing? The Case of Multiplication and Division in Fourth Grade NAEP Items

Multiplicative reasoning is a key concept in elementary school mathematics. Item statistics reported by the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) assessment provide the best current indicator for how well elementary students across the U.S. understand this, and other concepts. However,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karl W. Kosko, Rashmi Singh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Columbia University Libraries 2018-05-01
Series:Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College
Online Access:https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/jmetc/article/view/597
id doaj-40ef6d4408d242ef8a707a58ab41572e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-40ef6d4408d242ef8a707a58ab41572e2020-11-25T03:10:25ZengColumbia University LibrariesJournal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College2156-14002156-13972018-05-019110.7916/jmetc.v9i1.597What Form of Mathematics are Assessments Assessing? The Case of Multiplication and Division in Fourth Grade NAEP ItemsKarl W. Kosko0Rashmi Singh1Kent State UniversityKent State University Multiplicative reasoning is a key concept in elementary school mathematics. Item statistics reported by the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) assessment provide the best current indicator for how well elementary students across the U.S. understand this, and other concepts. However, beyond expert reviews and statistical analysis, there is relatively little evidence on the validity of NAEP items for assessing mathematical reasoning. The present study examined the convergent validity of several public-release fourth grade NAEP multiplication items. Findings indicate that most items assessed lack sufficient validity for examining children’s underlying conceptual knowledge. Rather, NAEP items may be less appropriate for assessing conceptual understanding and more appropriate for assessing procedural recall. Recommendations and implications are discussed. https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/jmetc/article/view/597
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Karl W. Kosko
Rashmi Singh
spellingShingle Karl W. Kosko
Rashmi Singh
What Form of Mathematics are Assessments Assessing? The Case of Multiplication and Division in Fourth Grade NAEP Items
Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College
author_facet Karl W. Kosko
Rashmi Singh
author_sort Karl W. Kosko
title What Form of Mathematics are Assessments Assessing? The Case of Multiplication and Division in Fourth Grade NAEP Items
title_short What Form of Mathematics are Assessments Assessing? The Case of Multiplication and Division in Fourth Grade NAEP Items
title_full What Form of Mathematics are Assessments Assessing? The Case of Multiplication and Division in Fourth Grade NAEP Items
title_fullStr What Form of Mathematics are Assessments Assessing? The Case of Multiplication and Division in Fourth Grade NAEP Items
title_full_unstemmed What Form of Mathematics are Assessments Assessing? The Case of Multiplication and Division in Fourth Grade NAEP Items
title_sort what form of mathematics are assessments assessing? the case of multiplication and division in fourth grade naep items
publisher Columbia University Libraries
series Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College
issn 2156-1400
2156-1397
publishDate 2018-05-01
description Multiplicative reasoning is a key concept in elementary school mathematics. Item statistics reported by the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) assessment provide the best current indicator for how well elementary students across the U.S. understand this, and other concepts. However, beyond expert reviews and statistical analysis, there is relatively little evidence on the validity of NAEP items for assessing mathematical reasoning. The present study examined the convergent validity of several public-release fourth grade NAEP multiplication items. Findings indicate that most items assessed lack sufficient validity for examining children’s underlying conceptual knowledge. Rather, NAEP items may be less appropriate for assessing conceptual understanding and more appropriate for assessing procedural recall. Recommendations and implications are discussed.
url https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/jmetc/article/view/597
work_keys_str_mv AT karlwkosko whatformofmathematicsareassessmentsassessingthecaseofmultiplicationanddivisioninfourthgradenaepitems
AT rashmisingh whatformofmathematicsareassessmentsassessingthecaseofmultiplicationanddivisioninfourthgradenaepitems
_version_ 1724658721507770368