Can Science Be Enchanting?

Writing dissertations, papers, or articles on a variety of religions, often foreign to us, sometimes even extinct, we more often than not find ourselves between two opposing theoretical camps, each deprecating the other, one being accused of »colonizing the Other,« the second of promoting a boundles...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sebastian Cöllen
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Zeitschrift für junge Religionswissenschaft 2017-05-01
Series:Zeitschrift für Junge Religionswissenschaft
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/zjr/722
id doaj-40d51c84ee344e1697c12ebc35fce69c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-40d51c84ee344e1697c12ebc35fce69c2020-11-24T23:10:04ZdeuZeitschrift für junge ReligionswissenschaftZeitschrift für Junge Religionswissenschaft1862-58862017-05-0110.4000/zjr.722Can Science Be Enchanting?Sebastian CöllenWriting dissertations, papers, or articles on a variety of religions, often foreign to us, sometimes even extinct, we more often than not find ourselves between two opposing theoretical camps, each deprecating the other, one being accused of »colonizing the Other,« the second of promoting a boundless relativism. Why does scientific explanation tend to »disenchant« its objects (Weber)? And what is the option, assuming we want to revert neither to the romantic Nacherlebnis of Dilthey, nor to the relativism inherent in much post-modernist work? I would like to speak about possible ways between these camps and will venture a third option, one that tries to evade the old and influential dichotomy of (subjective) interpretation and (objective) explanation.http://journals.openedition.org/zjr/722
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sebastian Cöllen
spellingShingle Sebastian Cöllen
Can Science Be Enchanting?
Zeitschrift für Junge Religionswissenschaft
author_facet Sebastian Cöllen
author_sort Sebastian Cöllen
title Can Science Be Enchanting?
title_short Can Science Be Enchanting?
title_full Can Science Be Enchanting?
title_fullStr Can Science Be Enchanting?
title_full_unstemmed Can Science Be Enchanting?
title_sort can science be enchanting?
publisher Zeitschrift für junge Religionswissenschaft
series Zeitschrift für Junge Religionswissenschaft
issn 1862-5886
publishDate 2017-05-01
description Writing dissertations, papers, or articles on a variety of religions, often foreign to us, sometimes even extinct, we more often than not find ourselves between two opposing theoretical camps, each deprecating the other, one being accused of »colonizing the Other,« the second of promoting a boundless relativism. Why does scientific explanation tend to »disenchant« its objects (Weber)? And what is the option, assuming we want to revert neither to the romantic Nacherlebnis of Dilthey, nor to the relativism inherent in much post-modernist work? I would like to speak about possible ways between these camps and will venture a third option, one that tries to evade the old and influential dichotomy of (subjective) interpretation and (objective) explanation.
url http://journals.openedition.org/zjr/722
work_keys_str_mv AT sebastiancollen cansciencebeenchanting
_version_ 1725608266536321024