Differences between lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma in histological distribution of residual tumor after induction chemoradiotherapy

Abstract Aims To facilitate dose planning for convergent beam radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), tumor response and histological distribution of residual tumors after induction chemoradiotherapy (ICRT) were compared between adenocarcinoma (AD) and squamous cell carcinoma (SQ). Metho...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hiroaki Nomori, Atsushi Shiraishi, Koichi Honma, Kazufusa Shoji, Ayumu Otsuki, Yue Cong, Hiroshi Sugimura, Yu Oyama
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2021-09-01
Series:Discover Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-021-00431-8
id doaj-40c92920644a4953a5967016b96e38c8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-40c92920644a4953a5967016b96e38c82021-10-03T11:59:23ZengSpringerDiscover Oncology2730-60112021-09-0112111110.1007/s12672-021-00431-8Differences between lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma in histological distribution of residual tumor after induction chemoradiotherapyHiroaki Nomori0Atsushi Shiraishi1Koichi Honma2Kazufusa Shoji3Ayumu Otsuki4Yue Cong5Hiroshi Sugimura6Yu Oyama7Department of Thoracic Surgery, Kashiwa Kousei General HospitalDepartment of Emergency and Trauma Center, Kameda Medical CenterDepartment of Pathology, Kameda Medical CenterDepartment of Radiology, Kameda Medical CenterDepartment of Thoracic Pulmonary Medicine, Kameda Medical CenterDepartment of Minimally Invasive Surgical and Medical Oncology, Fukushima Medical UniversityDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Kameda Medical CenterDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kameda Medical CenterAbstract Aims To facilitate dose planning for convergent beam radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), tumor response and histological distribution of residual tumors after induction chemoradiotherapy (ICRT) were compared between adenocarcinoma (AD) and squamous cell carcinoma (SQ). Methods Ninety-five patients with N1–2 or T3–4 NSCLC were treated with ICRT followed by surgery; 55 had AD and 40 had SQ. For the evaluation of distribution of residual tumors, the location of the external margin of residual tumors was assessed on surgical materials as follows: radius of whole tumor (“a”); distance between the center of tumor and the external margin of residual tumor (“b”); and its location (“b/a”). Results Of the 55 AD cases, 8 (15%) showed pathological complete remission, which was significantly less frequent than 22 of 40 SQ cases (55%) (p < 0.001). AD showed the residual tumors at the most periphery of tumor (b/a = 1.0) more frequently than SQ, i.e., 39/55 (71%) versus 6/40 (15%), respectively (p < 0.001). Even in 65 cases other than the pathological complete remission, external margins in 47 AD cases located more periphery than those in 18 SQ cases, of which mean b/a values were 0.97 ± 0.17 and 0.70 ± 0.29, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusion AD showed worse tumor response to ICRT than SQ. After ICRT, AD remained at the periphery of primary tumor more frequently than SQ. It seems that, also in the convergent beam radiotherapy, the periphery part of AD would be more resistant than that of SQ.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-021-00431-8Lung cancerAdenocarcinomaSquamous cell carcinomaInduction chemoradiotherapyTumor responseRadiosensitivity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hiroaki Nomori
Atsushi Shiraishi
Koichi Honma
Kazufusa Shoji
Ayumu Otsuki
Yue Cong
Hiroshi Sugimura
Yu Oyama
spellingShingle Hiroaki Nomori
Atsushi Shiraishi
Koichi Honma
Kazufusa Shoji
Ayumu Otsuki
Yue Cong
Hiroshi Sugimura
Yu Oyama
Differences between lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma in histological distribution of residual tumor after induction chemoradiotherapy
Discover Oncology
Lung cancer
Adenocarcinoma
Squamous cell carcinoma
Induction chemoradiotherapy
Tumor response
Radiosensitivity
author_facet Hiroaki Nomori
Atsushi Shiraishi
Koichi Honma
Kazufusa Shoji
Ayumu Otsuki
Yue Cong
Hiroshi Sugimura
Yu Oyama
author_sort Hiroaki Nomori
title Differences between lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma in histological distribution of residual tumor after induction chemoradiotherapy
title_short Differences between lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma in histological distribution of residual tumor after induction chemoradiotherapy
title_full Differences between lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma in histological distribution of residual tumor after induction chemoradiotherapy
title_fullStr Differences between lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma in histological distribution of residual tumor after induction chemoradiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Differences between lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma in histological distribution of residual tumor after induction chemoradiotherapy
title_sort differences between lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma in histological distribution of residual tumor after induction chemoradiotherapy
publisher Springer
series Discover Oncology
issn 2730-6011
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Abstract Aims To facilitate dose planning for convergent beam radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), tumor response and histological distribution of residual tumors after induction chemoradiotherapy (ICRT) were compared between adenocarcinoma (AD) and squamous cell carcinoma (SQ). Methods Ninety-five patients with N1–2 or T3–4 NSCLC were treated with ICRT followed by surgery; 55 had AD and 40 had SQ. For the evaluation of distribution of residual tumors, the location of the external margin of residual tumors was assessed on surgical materials as follows: radius of whole tumor (“a”); distance between the center of tumor and the external margin of residual tumor (“b”); and its location (“b/a”). Results Of the 55 AD cases, 8 (15%) showed pathological complete remission, which was significantly less frequent than 22 of 40 SQ cases (55%) (p < 0.001). AD showed the residual tumors at the most periphery of tumor (b/a = 1.0) more frequently than SQ, i.e., 39/55 (71%) versus 6/40 (15%), respectively (p < 0.001). Even in 65 cases other than the pathological complete remission, external margins in 47 AD cases located more periphery than those in 18 SQ cases, of which mean b/a values were 0.97 ± 0.17 and 0.70 ± 0.29, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusion AD showed worse tumor response to ICRT than SQ. After ICRT, AD remained at the periphery of primary tumor more frequently than SQ. It seems that, also in the convergent beam radiotherapy, the periphery part of AD would be more resistant than that of SQ.
topic Lung cancer
Adenocarcinoma
Squamous cell carcinoma
Induction chemoradiotherapy
Tumor response
Radiosensitivity
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-021-00431-8
work_keys_str_mv AT hiroakinomori differencesbetweenlungadenocarcinomaandsquamouscellcarcinomainhistologicaldistributionofresidualtumorafterinductionchemoradiotherapy
AT atsushishiraishi differencesbetweenlungadenocarcinomaandsquamouscellcarcinomainhistologicaldistributionofresidualtumorafterinductionchemoradiotherapy
AT koichihonma differencesbetweenlungadenocarcinomaandsquamouscellcarcinomainhistologicaldistributionofresidualtumorafterinductionchemoradiotherapy
AT kazufusashoji differencesbetweenlungadenocarcinomaandsquamouscellcarcinomainhistologicaldistributionofresidualtumorafterinductionchemoradiotherapy
AT ayumuotsuki differencesbetweenlungadenocarcinomaandsquamouscellcarcinomainhistologicaldistributionofresidualtumorafterinductionchemoradiotherapy
AT yuecong differencesbetweenlungadenocarcinomaandsquamouscellcarcinomainhistologicaldistributionofresidualtumorafterinductionchemoradiotherapy
AT hiroshisugimura differencesbetweenlungadenocarcinomaandsquamouscellcarcinomainhistologicaldistributionofresidualtumorafterinductionchemoradiotherapy
AT yuoyama differencesbetweenlungadenocarcinomaandsquamouscellcarcinomainhistologicaldistributionofresidualtumorafterinductionchemoradiotherapy
_version_ 1716845033695477760