Fixation patterns during recognition of personally familiar and unfamiliar faces

Previous studies recording eye movements have rendered inconclusive findings with respect to processing differences between familiar and unfamiliar faces. We argue that this can be attributed to a number of factors that differ across studies: the type and extent of familiarity with stimuli presented...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Goedele Van Belle, Meike Ramon, Philippe Lefèvre, Bruno Rossion
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2010-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00020/full
id doaj-40b34562bb674570bea80de6441cc44e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-40b34562bb674570bea80de6441cc44e2020-11-24T22:55:28ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782010-06-01110.3389/fpsyg.2010.000201338Fixation patterns during recognition of personally familiar and unfamiliar facesGoedele Van Belle0Meike Ramon1Philippe Lefèvre2Bruno Rossion3Université Catholique de LouvainUniversité Catholique de LouvainUniversité Catholique de LouvainUniversité Catholique de LouvainPrevious studies recording eye movements have rendered inconclusive findings with respect to processing differences between familiar and unfamiliar faces. We argue that this can be attributed to a number of factors that differ across studies: the type and extent of familiarity with stimuli presented, the varying spatial resolution of visual information and/or specifics, the definition of areas of interest subject to analyses, as well as the fact that the time course of scan patterns is often neglected. Here we sought to address these issues by recording gaze patterns in a face recognition task with personally familiar and unfamiliar faces, without predefining areas of interest and investigating potential processing differences at each individual fixation. We found that after a first fixation on the center of mass of the face—suggesting an initial holistic perception—and a subsequent left eye bias, local features were focused and explored more for familiar than unfamiliar faces. Although the number of fixations made did not differ for un-/familiar faces, the locations of fixations began to differ much earlier than when the familiarity decisions were provided. This suggests that without strict time constraints, different types of information are collected relatively early on familiar and unfamiliar faces.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00020/fullEye Movementsface recognitionPersonal familiarity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Goedele Van Belle
Meike Ramon
Philippe Lefèvre
Bruno Rossion
spellingShingle Goedele Van Belle
Meike Ramon
Philippe Lefèvre
Bruno Rossion
Fixation patterns during recognition of personally familiar and unfamiliar faces
Frontiers in Psychology
Eye Movements
face recognition
Personal familiarity
author_facet Goedele Van Belle
Meike Ramon
Philippe Lefèvre
Bruno Rossion
author_sort Goedele Van Belle
title Fixation patterns during recognition of personally familiar and unfamiliar faces
title_short Fixation patterns during recognition of personally familiar and unfamiliar faces
title_full Fixation patterns during recognition of personally familiar and unfamiliar faces
title_fullStr Fixation patterns during recognition of personally familiar and unfamiliar faces
title_full_unstemmed Fixation patterns during recognition of personally familiar and unfamiliar faces
title_sort fixation patterns during recognition of personally familiar and unfamiliar faces
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2010-06-01
description Previous studies recording eye movements have rendered inconclusive findings with respect to processing differences between familiar and unfamiliar faces. We argue that this can be attributed to a number of factors that differ across studies: the type and extent of familiarity with stimuli presented, the varying spatial resolution of visual information and/or specifics, the definition of areas of interest subject to analyses, as well as the fact that the time course of scan patterns is often neglected. Here we sought to address these issues by recording gaze patterns in a face recognition task with personally familiar and unfamiliar faces, without predefining areas of interest and investigating potential processing differences at each individual fixation. We found that after a first fixation on the center of mass of the face—suggesting an initial holistic perception—and a subsequent left eye bias, local features were focused and explored more for familiar than unfamiliar faces. Although the number of fixations made did not differ for un-/familiar faces, the locations of fixations began to differ much earlier than when the familiarity decisions were provided. This suggests that without strict time constraints, different types of information are collected relatively early on familiar and unfamiliar faces.
topic Eye Movements
face recognition
Personal familiarity
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00020/full
work_keys_str_mv AT goedelevanbelle fixationpatternsduringrecognitionofpersonallyfamiliarandunfamiliarfaces
AT meikeramon fixationpatternsduringrecognitionofpersonallyfamiliarandunfamiliarfaces
AT philippelefevre fixationpatternsduringrecognitionofpersonallyfamiliarandunfamiliarfaces
AT brunorossion fixationpatternsduringrecognitionofpersonallyfamiliarandunfamiliarfaces
_version_ 1725656124612411392