Surveys of post-operative pain management in a teaching hospital in Rwanda — 2013 and 2017

Background: Postoperative pain management (POPM) appeared to be weak in Rwanda. Aims: The aim of this study was to compare POPM measures in a teaching hospital between 2013 and 2017. Methods: A two-phase observational study in 2013 and 2017. was conducted. Participants were recruited prior to major...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: William McKay, Danyela Lee, Adolphe Masu, Shefali Thakore, Eugene Tuyishime, Joseph Niyitegeka, Paulin Ruhato, Theogene Twagirumugabe, Jennifer O’Brien
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2019-01-01
Series:Canadian Journal of Pain
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/24740527.2019.1673158
id doaj-40b0e5e0bb4448c894d90156e39cb233
record_format Article
spelling doaj-40b0e5e0bb4448c894d90156e39cb2332021-01-04T18:52:24ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCanadian Journal of Pain2474-05272019-01-013119019910.1080/24740527.2019.16731581673158Surveys of post-operative pain management in a teaching hospital in Rwanda — 2013 and 2017William McKay0Danyela Lee1Adolphe Masu2Shefali Thakore3Eugene Tuyishime4Joseph Niyitegeka5Paulin Ruhato6Theogene Twagirumugabe7Jennifer O’Brien8University of SaskatchewanUniversity of SaskatchewanCritical Care and Emergency Medicine, University of RwandaUniversity of SaskatchewanCritical Care and Emergency Medicine, University of RwandaCritical Care and Emergency Medicine, University of RwandaCritical Care and Emergency Medicine, University of RwandaCritical Care and Emergency Medicine, University of RwandaUniversity of SaskatchewanBackground: Postoperative pain management (POPM) appeared to be weak in Rwanda. Aims: The aim of this study was to compare POPM measures in a teaching hospital between 2013 and 2017. Methods: A two-phase observational study in 2013 and 2017. was conducted. Participants were recruited prior to major surgery and followed for two postoperative days. A numerical rating scale (0–10) was administered to all participants in both years, and the International Pain Outcomes questionnaire was administered in 2017. Recruitment, consent, and data collection were performed in participants’ preferred language. Results: One hundred adult participants undergoing major general, gynecologic, orthopedic, or urologic surgery were recruited in 2013 and 83 were recruited in 2017. Fourteen percent of participants in 2013 and 46% in 2017 scored their worst pain as severe (>6; P < 0.001). This was despite improved preoperative recognition of patients at high risk for severe postoperative pain (those with chronic pain or preoperative pain); 27% and 0% of these patients were not documented in 2013 and 2017, respectively (P = 0.006). Other measures of improved planning included “any preoperative discussion of POPM” (P < 0.001) and “discussion of POPM options” (P = 0.002). Preemptive analgesia use increased (3% of participants in 2013 and 54% in 2017; P < 0.001). Incidence of participants having no postoperative analgesic at all decreased from 25% in 2013 to 5% in 2017 (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Though severe postoperative pain incidence did not improve from 2013 to 2017, POPM improved by a number of measures. These changes may be attributed to pain research conducted there having raised awareness.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/24740527.2019.1673158painpostoperativepain managementsurveys and questionnairesincomesurgeryperioperative procedures
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author William McKay
Danyela Lee
Adolphe Masu
Shefali Thakore
Eugene Tuyishime
Joseph Niyitegeka
Paulin Ruhato
Theogene Twagirumugabe
Jennifer O’Brien
spellingShingle William McKay
Danyela Lee
Adolphe Masu
Shefali Thakore
Eugene Tuyishime
Joseph Niyitegeka
Paulin Ruhato
Theogene Twagirumugabe
Jennifer O’Brien
Surveys of post-operative pain management in a teaching hospital in Rwanda — 2013 and 2017
Canadian Journal of Pain
pain
postoperative
pain management
surveys and questionnaires
income
surgery
perioperative procedures
author_facet William McKay
Danyela Lee
Adolphe Masu
Shefali Thakore
Eugene Tuyishime
Joseph Niyitegeka
Paulin Ruhato
Theogene Twagirumugabe
Jennifer O’Brien
author_sort William McKay
title Surveys of post-operative pain management in a teaching hospital in Rwanda — 2013 and 2017
title_short Surveys of post-operative pain management in a teaching hospital in Rwanda — 2013 and 2017
title_full Surveys of post-operative pain management in a teaching hospital in Rwanda — 2013 and 2017
title_fullStr Surveys of post-operative pain management in a teaching hospital in Rwanda — 2013 and 2017
title_full_unstemmed Surveys of post-operative pain management in a teaching hospital in Rwanda — 2013 and 2017
title_sort surveys of post-operative pain management in a teaching hospital in rwanda — 2013 and 2017
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Canadian Journal of Pain
issn 2474-0527
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Background: Postoperative pain management (POPM) appeared to be weak in Rwanda. Aims: The aim of this study was to compare POPM measures in a teaching hospital between 2013 and 2017. Methods: A two-phase observational study in 2013 and 2017. was conducted. Participants were recruited prior to major surgery and followed for two postoperative days. A numerical rating scale (0–10) was administered to all participants in both years, and the International Pain Outcomes questionnaire was administered in 2017. Recruitment, consent, and data collection were performed in participants’ preferred language. Results: One hundred adult participants undergoing major general, gynecologic, orthopedic, or urologic surgery were recruited in 2013 and 83 were recruited in 2017. Fourteen percent of participants in 2013 and 46% in 2017 scored their worst pain as severe (>6; P < 0.001). This was despite improved preoperative recognition of patients at high risk for severe postoperative pain (those with chronic pain or preoperative pain); 27% and 0% of these patients were not documented in 2013 and 2017, respectively (P = 0.006). Other measures of improved planning included “any preoperative discussion of POPM” (P < 0.001) and “discussion of POPM options” (P = 0.002). Preemptive analgesia use increased (3% of participants in 2013 and 54% in 2017; P < 0.001). Incidence of participants having no postoperative analgesic at all decreased from 25% in 2013 to 5% in 2017 (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Though severe postoperative pain incidence did not improve from 2013 to 2017, POPM improved by a number of measures. These changes may be attributed to pain research conducted there having raised awareness.
topic pain
postoperative
pain management
surveys and questionnaires
income
surgery
perioperative procedures
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/24740527.2019.1673158
work_keys_str_mv AT williammckay surveysofpostoperativepainmanagementinateachinghospitalinrwanda2013and2017
AT danyelalee surveysofpostoperativepainmanagementinateachinghospitalinrwanda2013and2017
AT adolphemasu surveysofpostoperativepainmanagementinateachinghospitalinrwanda2013and2017
AT shefalithakore surveysofpostoperativepainmanagementinateachinghospitalinrwanda2013and2017
AT eugenetuyishime surveysofpostoperativepainmanagementinateachinghospitalinrwanda2013and2017
AT josephniyitegeka surveysofpostoperativepainmanagementinateachinghospitalinrwanda2013and2017
AT paulinruhato surveysofpostoperativepainmanagementinateachinghospitalinrwanda2013and2017
AT theogenetwagirumugabe surveysofpostoperativepainmanagementinateachinghospitalinrwanda2013and2017
AT jenniferobrien surveysofpostoperativepainmanagementinateachinghospitalinrwanda2013and2017
_version_ 1724348974940291072