Does endoscopic sclerotherapy in filarial chyluria affect renal function and morphology? A prospective study using dimercaptosuccinic acid renal scan

Objective: To look for change in relative renal function and document renal scarring following endoscopic renal pelvic instillation sclerotherapy (RPIS) in patients with chyluria by dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) renal scan. Methods: A prospective study was performed between November 2015 and Septem...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bimalesh Purkait, Apul Goel, Satyawati Deswal, Monica Agrawal, BhupendraPal Singh, Manoj Kumar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-10-01
Series:Asian Journal of Urology
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214388219300177
id doaj-40ae9a9d117e40f19ed8828c938975f3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-40ae9a9d117e40f19ed8828c938975f32020-11-25T02:02:11ZengElsevierAsian Journal of Urology2214-38822019-10-0164359363Does endoscopic sclerotherapy in filarial chyluria affect renal function and morphology? A prospective study using dimercaptosuccinic acid renal scanBimalesh Purkait0Apul Goel1Satyawati Deswal2Monica Agrawal3BhupendraPal Singh4Manoj Kumar5Department of Urology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, IndiaDepartment of Urology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India; Corresponding author.Department of Nuclear Medicine, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, IndiaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, IndiaDepartment of Urology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, IndiaDepartment of Urology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, IndiaObjective: To look for change in relative renal function and document renal scarring following endoscopic renal pelvic instillation sclerotherapy (RPIS) in patients with chyluria by dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) renal scan. Methods: A prospective study was performed between November 2015 and September 2016. All patients with biochemically documented chyluria who underwent RPIS using either 1%-silver nitrate or 0.1%-povidine iodine were included. Patients received either 3-, 6- or 9-doses. DMSA renal scan was performed before and 2–3 months after sclerotherapy. Results: Of the 34 patients, 22 were males. Mean age was 41.08 ± 16.64 years (range, 15–70 years). Thirty-two patients (94.1%) responded to therapy while two did not respond even after 9-doses. Average follow-up was 8.94 ± 3.70 months. The mean relative renal function (pre-instillation) of normal kidney was 50.76% ± 3.55% while that of affected renal unit (side of instillation) was 49.20% ± 3.44% (range, 43.0%–61.0%). After instillation therapy, the mean relative renal function of normal side was 52.26% ± 3.57% while that of affected renal unit was 47.50% ± 3.56% (range, 41.0%–54.0%). The relative renal function did not change >5% from the baseline value in any patient except one (in which the differential function increased paradoxically by 12%). Two patients developed renal scar in post-instillation renal scan. Conclusion: Endoscopic sclerotherapy in chyluria is safe and effective. The relative renal function does not deteriorate by more than 5%. There is a small risk of development of renal scar. More studies involving larger number of patients are needed to answer this dilemma. Keywords: Chyluria, Endoscopic sclerotherapy, Dimercaptosuccinic acid renal scan, Relative renal function, Renal scarringhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214388219300177
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bimalesh Purkait
Apul Goel
Satyawati Deswal
Monica Agrawal
BhupendraPal Singh
Manoj Kumar
spellingShingle Bimalesh Purkait
Apul Goel
Satyawati Deswal
Monica Agrawal
BhupendraPal Singh
Manoj Kumar
Does endoscopic sclerotherapy in filarial chyluria affect renal function and morphology? A prospective study using dimercaptosuccinic acid renal scan
Asian Journal of Urology
author_facet Bimalesh Purkait
Apul Goel
Satyawati Deswal
Monica Agrawal
BhupendraPal Singh
Manoj Kumar
author_sort Bimalesh Purkait
title Does endoscopic sclerotherapy in filarial chyluria affect renal function and morphology? A prospective study using dimercaptosuccinic acid renal scan
title_short Does endoscopic sclerotherapy in filarial chyluria affect renal function and morphology? A prospective study using dimercaptosuccinic acid renal scan
title_full Does endoscopic sclerotherapy in filarial chyluria affect renal function and morphology? A prospective study using dimercaptosuccinic acid renal scan
title_fullStr Does endoscopic sclerotherapy in filarial chyluria affect renal function and morphology? A prospective study using dimercaptosuccinic acid renal scan
title_full_unstemmed Does endoscopic sclerotherapy in filarial chyluria affect renal function and morphology? A prospective study using dimercaptosuccinic acid renal scan
title_sort does endoscopic sclerotherapy in filarial chyluria affect renal function and morphology? a prospective study using dimercaptosuccinic acid renal scan
publisher Elsevier
series Asian Journal of Urology
issn 2214-3882
publishDate 2019-10-01
description Objective: To look for change in relative renal function and document renal scarring following endoscopic renal pelvic instillation sclerotherapy (RPIS) in patients with chyluria by dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) renal scan. Methods: A prospective study was performed between November 2015 and September 2016. All patients with biochemically documented chyluria who underwent RPIS using either 1%-silver nitrate or 0.1%-povidine iodine were included. Patients received either 3-, 6- or 9-doses. DMSA renal scan was performed before and 2–3 months after sclerotherapy. Results: Of the 34 patients, 22 were males. Mean age was 41.08 ± 16.64 years (range, 15–70 years). Thirty-two patients (94.1%) responded to therapy while two did not respond even after 9-doses. Average follow-up was 8.94 ± 3.70 months. The mean relative renal function (pre-instillation) of normal kidney was 50.76% ± 3.55% while that of affected renal unit (side of instillation) was 49.20% ± 3.44% (range, 43.0%–61.0%). After instillation therapy, the mean relative renal function of normal side was 52.26% ± 3.57% while that of affected renal unit was 47.50% ± 3.56% (range, 41.0%–54.0%). The relative renal function did not change >5% from the baseline value in any patient except one (in which the differential function increased paradoxically by 12%). Two patients developed renal scar in post-instillation renal scan. Conclusion: Endoscopic sclerotherapy in chyluria is safe and effective. The relative renal function does not deteriorate by more than 5%. There is a small risk of development of renal scar. More studies involving larger number of patients are needed to answer this dilemma. Keywords: Chyluria, Endoscopic sclerotherapy, Dimercaptosuccinic acid renal scan, Relative renal function, Renal scarring
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214388219300177
work_keys_str_mv AT bimaleshpurkait doesendoscopicsclerotherapyinfilarialchyluriaaffectrenalfunctionandmorphologyaprospectivestudyusingdimercaptosuccinicacidrenalscan
AT apulgoel doesendoscopicsclerotherapyinfilarialchyluriaaffectrenalfunctionandmorphologyaprospectivestudyusingdimercaptosuccinicacidrenalscan
AT satyawatideswal doesendoscopicsclerotherapyinfilarialchyluriaaffectrenalfunctionandmorphologyaprospectivestudyusingdimercaptosuccinicacidrenalscan
AT monicaagrawal doesendoscopicsclerotherapyinfilarialchyluriaaffectrenalfunctionandmorphologyaprospectivestudyusingdimercaptosuccinicacidrenalscan
AT bhupendrapalsingh doesendoscopicsclerotherapyinfilarialchyluriaaffectrenalfunctionandmorphologyaprospectivestudyusingdimercaptosuccinicacidrenalscan
AT manojkumar doesendoscopicsclerotherapyinfilarialchyluriaaffectrenalfunctionandmorphologyaprospectivestudyusingdimercaptosuccinicacidrenalscan
_version_ 1724954301918347264