Fluid type and volume reduce risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis and length of hospital stay in high-risk patients: a secondary analysis of the INDIEH trial*
Background and study aims Impact of intravenous fluid administration on prophylaxis against post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP) has not been rigorously evaluated among patients at high-risk for PEP. Patients and methods Effect of volume and type of fluid...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2020-06-01
|
Series: | Endoscopy International Open |
Online Access: | http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-1149-1359 |
id |
doaj-40907b26f17b4ab391518c7620aab6c5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-40907b26f17b4ab391518c7620aab6c52020-11-25T01:20:25ZengGeorg Thieme Verlag KGEndoscopy International Open2364-37222196-97362020-06-010807E834E83910.1055/a-1149-1359Fluid type and volume reduce risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis and length of hospital stay in high-risk patients: a secondary analysis of the INDIEH trial*Rupjyoti Talukdar0Ayesha Kamal1Venkata S. Akshintala2Rajesh Goud3Sundeep Lakhtakia4Mohan K. Ramchandani5Manu Tandan6G. V. Rao7Zaheer Nabi8Rajesh Gupta9Rakesh Kalapala10Jahangeer Basha11Manohar Reddy12Vijay K. Rai13Mahesh K Goenka14Saroj Sinha15Rakesh Kochhar16B. Joseph Elmunzer17Mouen A. Khashab18Anthony N. Kalloo19Vikesh K. Singh20D. Nageshwar Reddy21Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India Division of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, United StatesDivision of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, United StatesAsian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India Apollo Gleneagles Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, IndiaApollo Gleneagles Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, IndiaPostgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, IndiaPostgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, IndiaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United StatesDivision of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, United StatesDivision of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, United StatesDivision of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, United StatesAsian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India Background and study aims Impact of intravenous fluid administration on prophylaxis against post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP) has not been rigorously evaluated among patients at high-risk for PEP. Patients and methods Effect of volume and type of fluid administered on PEP incidence was studied through a secondary analysis of high-risk patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangopancreatography (ERCP) as a part of a randomized controlled trial in which all patients received rectal indomethacin. Periprocedural fluid was defined as fluid infused during and after ERCP. Results A total 960 patients were randomized during the trial, of whom 476 (49.6 %) received periprocedural fluids (mean volume = 1245 mL [± 629]). There was a trend towards a lower incidence of PEP in patients who received periprocedural fluid vs. those who did not (5.2 % vs. 8.0 %, P = 0.079). Among those receiving fluids, those who did not develop PEP received a higher mean volume of fluid vs. who developed PEP (1012 ± 725 mL vs. 752 ± 783 mL, P = 0.036). Among 174 patients (37 %) who received LR, patients who did not develop PEP received a higher mean volume of LR vs. those who developed PEP (570 ± 559 mL vs. 329 ± 356 mL, P = 0.006). Length of hospital stay decreased as the volume of periprocedural volume administration increased (r = 0.16, P < 0.001). Conclusion Higher fluid volume and lactated Ringerʼs use during the periprocedural period was associated with a decreased risk of PEP and length of hospital stay beyond rectal indomethacin in high risk patients.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-1149-1359 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Rupjyoti Talukdar Ayesha Kamal Venkata S. Akshintala Rajesh Goud Sundeep Lakhtakia Mohan K. Ramchandani Manu Tandan G. V. Rao Zaheer Nabi Rajesh Gupta Rakesh Kalapala Jahangeer Basha Manohar Reddy Vijay K. Rai Mahesh K Goenka Saroj Sinha Rakesh Kochhar B. Joseph Elmunzer Mouen A. Khashab Anthony N. Kalloo Vikesh K. Singh D. Nageshwar Reddy |
spellingShingle |
Rupjyoti Talukdar Ayesha Kamal Venkata S. Akshintala Rajesh Goud Sundeep Lakhtakia Mohan K. Ramchandani Manu Tandan G. V. Rao Zaheer Nabi Rajesh Gupta Rakesh Kalapala Jahangeer Basha Manohar Reddy Vijay K. Rai Mahesh K Goenka Saroj Sinha Rakesh Kochhar B. Joseph Elmunzer Mouen A. Khashab Anthony N. Kalloo Vikesh K. Singh D. Nageshwar Reddy Fluid type and volume reduce risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis and length of hospital stay in high-risk patients: a secondary analysis of the INDIEH trial* Endoscopy International Open |
author_facet |
Rupjyoti Talukdar Ayesha Kamal Venkata S. Akshintala Rajesh Goud Sundeep Lakhtakia Mohan K. Ramchandani Manu Tandan G. V. Rao Zaheer Nabi Rajesh Gupta Rakesh Kalapala Jahangeer Basha Manohar Reddy Vijay K. Rai Mahesh K Goenka Saroj Sinha Rakesh Kochhar B. Joseph Elmunzer Mouen A. Khashab Anthony N. Kalloo Vikesh K. Singh D. Nageshwar Reddy |
author_sort |
Rupjyoti Talukdar |
title |
Fluid type and volume reduce risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis and length of hospital stay in high-risk patients: a secondary analysis of the INDIEH trial* |
title_short |
Fluid type and volume reduce risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis and length of hospital stay in high-risk patients: a secondary analysis of the INDIEH trial* |
title_full |
Fluid type and volume reduce risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis and length of hospital stay in high-risk patients: a secondary analysis of the INDIEH trial* |
title_fullStr |
Fluid type and volume reduce risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis and length of hospital stay in high-risk patients: a secondary analysis of the INDIEH trial* |
title_full_unstemmed |
Fluid type and volume reduce risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis and length of hospital stay in high-risk patients: a secondary analysis of the INDIEH trial* |
title_sort |
fluid type and volume reduce risk of post-ercp pancreatitis and length of hospital stay in high-risk patients: a secondary analysis of the indieh trial* |
publisher |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
series |
Endoscopy International Open |
issn |
2364-3722 2196-9736 |
publishDate |
2020-06-01 |
description |
Background and study aims Impact of intravenous fluid administration on prophylaxis against post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP) has not been rigorously evaluated among patients at high-risk for PEP.
Patients and methods Effect of volume and type of fluid administered on PEP incidence was studied through a secondary analysis of high-risk patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangopancreatography (ERCP) as a part of a randomized controlled trial in which all patients received rectal indomethacin. Periprocedural fluid was defined as fluid infused during and after ERCP.
Results A total 960 patients were randomized during the trial, of whom 476 (49.6 %) received periprocedural fluids (mean volume = 1245 mL [± 629]). There was a trend towards a lower incidence of PEP in patients who received periprocedural fluid vs. those who did not (5.2 % vs. 8.0 %, P = 0.079). Among those receiving fluids, those who did not develop PEP received a higher mean volume of fluid vs. who developed PEP (1012 ± 725 mL vs. 752 ± 783 mL, P = 0.036). Among 174 patients (37 %) who received LR, patients who did not develop PEP received a higher mean volume of LR vs. those who developed PEP (570 ± 559 mL vs. 329 ± 356 mL, P = 0.006). Length of hospital stay decreased as the volume of periprocedural volume administration increased (r = 0.16, P < 0.001).
Conclusion Higher fluid volume and lactated Ringerʼs use during the periprocedural period was associated with a decreased risk of PEP and length of hospital stay beyond rectal indomethacin in high risk patients. |
url |
http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-1149-1359 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT rupjyotitalukdar fluidtypeandvolumereduceriskofpostercppancreatitisandlengthofhospitalstayinhighriskpatientsasecondaryanalysisoftheindiehtrial AT ayeshakamal fluidtypeandvolumereduceriskofpostercppancreatitisandlengthofhospitalstayinhighriskpatientsasecondaryanalysisoftheindiehtrial AT venkatasakshintala fluidtypeandvolumereduceriskofpostercppancreatitisandlengthofhospitalstayinhighriskpatientsasecondaryanalysisoftheindiehtrial AT rajeshgoud fluidtypeandvolumereduceriskofpostercppancreatitisandlengthofhospitalstayinhighriskpatientsasecondaryanalysisoftheindiehtrial AT sundeeplakhtakia fluidtypeandvolumereduceriskofpostercppancreatitisandlengthofhospitalstayinhighriskpatientsasecondaryanalysisoftheindiehtrial AT mohankramchandani fluidtypeandvolumereduceriskofpostercppancreatitisandlengthofhospitalstayinhighriskpatientsasecondaryanalysisoftheindiehtrial AT manutandan fluidtypeandvolumereduceriskofpostercppancreatitisandlengthofhospitalstayinhighriskpatientsasecondaryanalysisoftheindiehtrial AT gvrao fluidtypeandvolumereduceriskofpostercppancreatitisandlengthofhospitalstayinhighriskpatientsasecondaryanalysisoftheindiehtrial AT zaheernabi fluidtypeandvolumereduceriskofpostercppancreatitisandlengthofhospitalstayinhighriskpatientsasecondaryanalysisoftheindiehtrial AT rajeshgupta fluidtypeandvolumereduceriskofpostercppancreatitisandlengthofhospitalstayinhighriskpatientsasecondaryanalysisoftheindiehtrial AT rakeshkalapala fluidtypeandvolumereduceriskofpostercppancreatitisandlengthofhospitalstayinhighriskpatientsasecondaryanalysisoftheindiehtrial AT jahangeerbasha fluidtypeandvolumereduceriskofpostercppancreatitisandlengthofhospitalstayinhighriskpatientsasecondaryanalysisoftheindiehtrial AT manoharreddy fluidtypeandvolumereduceriskofpostercppancreatitisandlengthofhospitalstayinhighriskpatientsasecondaryanalysisoftheindiehtrial AT vijaykrai fluidtypeandvolumereduceriskofpostercppancreatitisandlengthofhospitalstayinhighriskpatientsasecondaryanalysisoftheindiehtrial AT maheshkgoenka fluidtypeandvolumereduceriskofpostercppancreatitisandlengthofhospitalstayinhighriskpatientsasecondaryanalysisoftheindiehtrial AT sarojsinha fluidtypeandvolumereduceriskofpostercppancreatitisandlengthofhospitalstayinhighriskpatientsasecondaryanalysisoftheindiehtrial AT rakeshkochhar fluidtypeandvolumereduceriskofpostercppancreatitisandlengthofhospitalstayinhighriskpatientsasecondaryanalysisoftheindiehtrial AT bjosephelmunzer fluidtypeandvolumereduceriskofpostercppancreatitisandlengthofhospitalstayinhighriskpatientsasecondaryanalysisoftheindiehtrial AT mouenakhashab fluidtypeandvolumereduceriskofpostercppancreatitisandlengthofhospitalstayinhighriskpatientsasecondaryanalysisoftheindiehtrial AT anthonynkalloo fluidtypeandvolumereduceriskofpostercppancreatitisandlengthofhospitalstayinhighriskpatientsasecondaryanalysisoftheindiehtrial AT vikeshksingh fluidtypeandvolumereduceriskofpostercppancreatitisandlengthofhospitalstayinhighriskpatientsasecondaryanalysisoftheindiehtrial AT dnageshwarreddy fluidtypeandvolumereduceriskofpostercppancreatitisandlengthofhospitalstayinhighriskpatientsasecondaryanalysisoftheindiehtrial |
_version_ |
1725134309509038080 |