A Pedagogical Framework for Mobile Learning: Categorizing Educational Applications of Mobile Technologies into Four Types
Instructional designers and educators recognize the potential of mobile technologies as a learning tool for students and have incorporated them into the distance learning environment. However, little research has been done to categorize the numerous examples of mobile learning in the context of dist...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Athabasca University Press
2011-02-01
|
Series: | International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/791/1699 |
id |
doaj-407ae0d95a874d1e99757b7eb067f73c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-407ae0d95a874d1e99757b7eb067f73c2020-11-24T21:26:40ZengAthabasca University PressInternational Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning1492-38312011-02-01122A Pedagogical Framework for Mobile Learning: Categorizing Educational Applications of Mobile Technologies into Four TypesYeonjeong ParkInstructional designers and educators recognize the potential of mobile technologies as a learning tool for students and have incorporated them into the distance learning environment. However, little research has been done to categorize the numerous examples of mobile learning in the context of distance education, and few instructional design guidelines based on a solid theoretical framework for mobile learning exist. In this paper I compare mobile learning (m-learning) with electronic learning (e-learning) and ubiquitous learning (u-learning) and describe the technological attributes and pedagogical affordances of mobile learning presented in previous studies. I modify transactional distance (TD) theory and adopt it as a relevant theoretical framework for mobile learning in distance education. Furthermore, I attempt to position previous studies into four types of mobile learning: 1) high transactional distance socialized m-learning, 2) high transactional distance individualized m-learning, 3) low transactional distance socialized m-learning, and 4) low transactional distance individualized m-learning. As a result, this paper can be used by instructional designers of open and distance learning to learn about the concepts of mobile learning and how mobile technologies can be incorporated into their teaching and learning more effectively.http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/791/1699m-learninge-learningu-learningtransactional distance theorycultural-historical activity theorydistance educationmobile technology |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yeonjeong Park |
spellingShingle |
Yeonjeong Park A Pedagogical Framework for Mobile Learning: Categorizing Educational Applications of Mobile Technologies into Four Types International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning m-learning e-learning u-learning transactional distance theory cultural-historical activity theory distance education mobile technology |
author_facet |
Yeonjeong Park |
author_sort |
Yeonjeong Park |
title |
A Pedagogical Framework for Mobile Learning: Categorizing Educational Applications of Mobile Technologies into Four Types |
title_short |
A Pedagogical Framework for Mobile Learning: Categorizing Educational Applications of Mobile Technologies into Four Types |
title_full |
A Pedagogical Framework for Mobile Learning: Categorizing Educational Applications of Mobile Technologies into Four Types |
title_fullStr |
A Pedagogical Framework for Mobile Learning: Categorizing Educational Applications of Mobile Technologies into Four Types |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Pedagogical Framework for Mobile Learning: Categorizing Educational Applications of Mobile Technologies into Four Types |
title_sort |
pedagogical framework for mobile learning: categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types |
publisher |
Athabasca University Press |
series |
International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning |
issn |
1492-3831 |
publishDate |
2011-02-01 |
description |
Instructional designers and educators recognize the potential of mobile technologies as a learning tool for students and have incorporated them into the distance learning environment. However, little research has been done to categorize the numerous examples of mobile learning in the context of distance education, and few instructional design guidelines based on a solid theoretical framework for mobile learning exist. In this paper I compare mobile learning (m-learning) with electronic learning (e-learning) and ubiquitous learning (u-learning) and describe the technological attributes and pedagogical affordances of mobile learning presented in previous studies. I modify transactional distance (TD) theory and adopt it as a relevant theoretical framework for mobile learning in distance education. Furthermore, I attempt to position previous studies into four types of mobile learning: 1) high transactional distance socialized m-learning, 2) high transactional distance individualized m-learning, 3) low transactional distance socialized m-learning, and 4) low transactional distance individualized m-learning. As a result, this paper can be used by instructional designers of open and distance learning to learn about the concepts of mobile learning and how mobile technologies can be incorporated into their teaching and learning more effectively. |
topic |
m-learning e-learning u-learning transactional distance theory cultural-historical activity theory distance education mobile technology |
url |
http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/791/1699 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yeonjeongpark apedagogicalframeworkformobilelearningcategorizingeducationalapplicationsofmobiletechnologiesintofourtypes AT yeonjeongpark pedagogicalframeworkformobilelearningcategorizingeducationalapplicationsofmobiletechnologiesintofourtypes |
_version_ |
1716716504759664640 |