A Pedagogical Framework for Mobile Learning: Categorizing Educational Applications of Mobile Technologies into Four Types

Instructional designers and educators recognize the potential of mobile technologies as a learning tool for students and have incorporated them into the distance learning environment. However, little research has been done to categorize the numerous examples of mobile learning in the context of dist...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Yeonjeong Park
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Athabasca University Press 2011-02-01
Series:International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/791/1699
id doaj-407ae0d95a874d1e99757b7eb067f73c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-407ae0d95a874d1e99757b7eb067f73c2020-11-24T21:26:40ZengAthabasca University PressInternational Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning1492-38312011-02-01122A Pedagogical Framework for Mobile Learning: Categorizing Educational Applications of Mobile Technologies into Four TypesYeonjeong ParkInstructional designers and educators recognize the potential of mobile technologies as a learning tool for students and have incorporated them into the distance learning environment. However, little research has been done to categorize the numerous examples of mobile learning in the context of distance education, and few instructional design guidelines based on a solid theoretical framework for mobile learning exist. In this paper I compare mobile learning (m-learning) with electronic learning (e-learning) and ubiquitous learning (u-learning) and describe the technological attributes and pedagogical affordances of mobile learning presented in previous studies. I modify transactional distance (TD) theory and adopt it as a relevant theoretical framework for mobile learning in distance education. Furthermore, I attempt to position previous studies into four types of mobile learning: 1) high transactional distance socialized m-learning, 2) high transactional distance individualized m-learning, 3) low transactional distance socialized m-learning, and 4) low transactional distance individualized m-learning. As a result, this paper can be used by instructional designers of open and distance learning to learn about the concepts of mobile learning and how mobile technologies can be incorporated into their teaching and learning more effectively.http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/791/1699m-learninge-learningu-learningtransactional distance theorycultural-historical activity theorydistance educationmobile technology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yeonjeong Park
spellingShingle Yeonjeong Park
A Pedagogical Framework for Mobile Learning: Categorizing Educational Applications of Mobile Technologies into Four Types
International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning
m-learning
e-learning
u-learning
transactional distance theory
cultural-historical activity theory
distance education
mobile technology
author_facet Yeonjeong Park
author_sort Yeonjeong Park
title A Pedagogical Framework for Mobile Learning: Categorizing Educational Applications of Mobile Technologies into Four Types
title_short A Pedagogical Framework for Mobile Learning: Categorizing Educational Applications of Mobile Technologies into Four Types
title_full A Pedagogical Framework for Mobile Learning: Categorizing Educational Applications of Mobile Technologies into Four Types
title_fullStr A Pedagogical Framework for Mobile Learning: Categorizing Educational Applications of Mobile Technologies into Four Types
title_full_unstemmed A Pedagogical Framework for Mobile Learning: Categorizing Educational Applications of Mobile Technologies into Four Types
title_sort pedagogical framework for mobile learning: categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types
publisher Athabasca University Press
series International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning
issn 1492-3831
publishDate 2011-02-01
description Instructional designers and educators recognize the potential of mobile technologies as a learning tool for students and have incorporated them into the distance learning environment. However, little research has been done to categorize the numerous examples of mobile learning in the context of distance education, and few instructional design guidelines based on a solid theoretical framework for mobile learning exist. In this paper I compare mobile learning (m-learning) with electronic learning (e-learning) and ubiquitous learning (u-learning) and describe the technological attributes and pedagogical affordances of mobile learning presented in previous studies. I modify transactional distance (TD) theory and adopt it as a relevant theoretical framework for mobile learning in distance education. Furthermore, I attempt to position previous studies into four types of mobile learning: 1) high transactional distance socialized m-learning, 2) high transactional distance individualized m-learning, 3) low transactional distance socialized m-learning, and 4) low transactional distance individualized m-learning. As a result, this paper can be used by instructional designers of open and distance learning to learn about the concepts of mobile learning and how mobile technologies can be incorporated into their teaching and learning more effectively.
topic m-learning
e-learning
u-learning
transactional distance theory
cultural-historical activity theory
distance education
mobile technology
url http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/791/1699
work_keys_str_mv AT yeonjeongpark apedagogicalframeworkformobilelearningcategorizingeducationalapplicationsofmobiletechnologiesintofourtypes
AT yeonjeongpark pedagogicalframeworkformobilelearningcategorizingeducationalapplicationsofmobiletechnologiesintofourtypes
_version_ 1716716504759664640