Postoperative clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers after inguinal hernia repair using local, spinal, or general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial.

<h4>Background</h4>No consensus has yet been reached regarding the best anesthetic technique for inguinal hernia repair. This study aimed to compare postoperative clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers among patients who were anesthetized using local, spinal, or general anesthesia fo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mingkwan Wongyingsinn, Pasawang Kohmongkoludom, Atthaphorn Trakarnsanga, Navin Horthongkham
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242925
id doaj-405f4e133d7b4a68863aa043e08ff33b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-405f4e133d7b4a68863aa043e08ff33b2021-03-04T12:29:21ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-011511e024292510.1371/journal.pone.0242925Postoperative clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers after inguinal hernia repair using local, spinal, or general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial.Mingkwan WongyingsinnPasawang KohmongkoludomAtthaphorn TrakarnsangaNavin Horthongkham<h4>Background</h4>No consensus has yet been reached regarding the best anesthetic technique for inguinal hernia repair. This study aimed to compare postoperative clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers among patients who were anesthetized using local, spinal, or general anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair.<h4>Methods</h4>This randomized controlled trial included patients scheduled to undergo elective unilateral inguinal hernioplasty at Siriraj Hospital during November 2014 to September 2015 study period. Patients were randomly assigned to the local (LA), spinal (SA), or general (GA) anesthesia groups. Primary outcomes were postoperative pain at rest and on mobilization at 8 and 24 hours after surgery.<h4>Results</h4>Fifty-four patients were included, with 18 patients randomly assigned to each group. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics were similar among groups. There were no significant differences among groups for postoperative pain at rest or on mobilization at 8 and 24 hours after surgery. No significant differences were observed for interleukin-1β, interleukin-6, and interleukin-10 at any time points in any groups. Patients with local anesthesia was associated with less time spent in anesthesia (p = 0.010) and surgery (p = 0.009), lower intraoperative cost (p = 0.003) and total cost in hospital (p = 0.036); however, patient satisfaction in the local anesthesia group (94/100) was statistically significantly lower than the spinal and general anesthesia groups (100/100) (p = 0.010).<h4>Conclusions</h4>No statistically significant difference was observed among groups for postoperative pain scores, duration of hospital stays, complications, or change in inflammatory markers. However, time spent in anesthesia and surgery, the intraoperative cost and total cost for hernia repair, and patient satisfaction were significantly lower in the local anesthesia group than in the other two groups.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242925
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mingkwan Wongyingsinn
Pasawang Kohmongkoludom
Atthaphorn Trakarnsanga
Navin Horthongkham
spellingShingle Mingkwan Wongyingsinn
Pasawang Kohmongkoludom
Atthaphorn Trakarnsanga
Navin Horthongkham
Postoperative clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers after inguinal hernia repair using local, spinal, or general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Mingkwan Wongyingsinn
Pasawang Kohmongkoludom
Atthaphorn Trakarnsanga
Navin Horthongkham
author_sort Mingkwan Wongyingsinn
title Postoperative clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers after inguinal hernia repair using local, spinal, or general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial.
title_short Postoperative clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers after inguinal hernia repair using local, spinal, or general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial.
title_full Postoperative clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers after inguinal hernia repair using local, spinal, or general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial.
title_fullStr Postoperative clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers after inguinal hernia repair using local, spinal, or general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial.
title_full_unstemmed Postoperative clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers after inguinal hernia repair using local, spinal, or general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial.
title_sort postoperative clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers after inguinal hernia repair using local, spinal, or general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description <h4>Background</h4>No consensus has yet been reached regarding the best anesthetic technique for inguinal hernia repair. This study aimed to compare postoperative clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers among patients who were anesthetized using local, spinal, or general anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair.<h4>Methods</h4>This randomized controlled trial included patients scheduled to undergo elective unilateral inguinal hernioplasty at Siriraj Hospital during November 2014 to September 2015 study period. Patients were randomly assigned to the local (LA), spinal (SA), or general (GA) anesthesia groups. Primary outcomes were postoperative pain at rest and on mobilization at 8 and 24 hours after surgery.<h4>Results</h4>Fifty-four patients were included, with 18 patients randomly assigned to each group. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics were similar among groups. There were no significant differences among groups for postoperative pain at rest or on mobilization at 8 and 24 hours after surgery. No significant differences were observed for interleukin-1β, interleukin-6, and interleukin-10 at any time points in any groups. Patients with local anesthesia was associated with less time spent in anesthesia (p = 0.010) and surgery (p = 0.009), lower intraoperative cost (p = 0.003) and total cost in hospital (p = 0.036); however, patient satisfaction in the local anesthesia group (94/100) was statistically significantly lower than the spinal and general anesthesia groups (100/100) (p = 0.010).<h4>Conclusions</h4>No statistically significant difference was observed among groups for postoperative pain scores, duration of hospital stays, complications, or change in inflammatory markers. However, time spent in anesthesia and surgery, the intraoperative cost and total cost for hernia repair, and patient satisfaction were significantly lower in the local anesthesia group than in the other two groups.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242925
work_keys_str_mv AT mingkwanwongyingsinn postoperativeclinicaloutcomesandinflammatorymarkersafteringuinalherniarepairusinglocalspinalorgeneralanesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pasawangkohmongkoludom postoperativeclinicaloutcomesandinflammatorymarkersafteringuinalherniarepairusinglocalspinalorgeneralanesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT atthaphorntrakarnsanga postoperativeclinicaloutcomesandinflammatorymarkersafteringuinalherniarepairusinglocalspinalorgeneralanesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT navinhorthongkham postoperativeclinicaloutcomesandinflammatorymarkersafteringuinalherniarepairusinglocalspinalorgeneralanesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1714802483984859136