Postoperative clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers after inguinal hernia repair using local, spinal, or general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial.
<h4>Background</h4>No consensus has yet been reached regarding the best anesthetic technique for inguinal hernia repair. This study aimed to compare postoperative clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers among patients who were anesthetized using local, spinal, or general anesthesia fo...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2020-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242925 |
id |
doaj-405f4e133d7b4a68863aa043e08ff33b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-405f4e133d7b4a68863aa043e08ff33b2021-03-04T12:29:21ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-011511e024292510.1371/journal.pone.0242925Postoperative clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers after inguinal hernia repair using local, spinal, or general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial.Mingkwan WongyingsinnPasawang KohmongkoludomAtthaphorn TrakarnsangaNavin Horthongkham<h4>Background</h4>No consensus has yet been reached regarding the best anesthetic technique for inguinal hernia repair. This study aimed to compare postoperative clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers among patients who were anesthetized using local, spinal, or general anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair.<h4>Methods</h4>This randomized controlled trial included patients scheduled to undergo elective unilateral inguinal hernioplasty at Siriraj Hospital during November 2014 to September 2015 study period. Patients were randomly assigned to the local (LA), spinal (SA), or general (GA) anesthesia groups. Primary outcomes were postoperative pain at rest and on mobilization at 8 and 24 hours after surgery.<h4>Results</h4>Fifty-four patients were included, with 18 patients randomly assigned to each group. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics were similar among groups. There were no significant differences among groups for postoperative pain at rest or on mobilization at 8 and 24 hours after surgery. No significant differences were observed for interleukin-1β, interleukin-6, and interleukin-10 at any time points in any groups. Patients with local anesthesia was associated with less time spent in anesthesia (p = 0.010) and surgery (p = 0.009), lower intraoperative cost (p = 0.003) and total cost in hospital (p = 0.036); however, patient satisfaction in the local anesthesia group (94/100) was statistically significantly lower than the spinal and general anesthesia groups (100/100) (p = 0.010).<h4>Conclusions</h4>No statistically significant difference was observed among groups for postoperative pain scores, duration of hospital stays, complications, or change in inflammatory markers. However, time spent in anesthesia and surgery, the intraoperative cost and total cost for hernia repair, and patient satisfaction were significantly lower in the local anesthesia group than in the other two groups.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242925 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mingkwan Wongyingsinn Pasawang Kohmongkoludom Atthaphorn Trakarnsanga Navin Horthongkham |
spellingShingle |
Mingkwan Wongyingsinn Pasawang Kohmongkoludom Atthaphorn Trakarnsanga Navin Horthongkham Postoperative clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers after inguinal hernia repair using local, spinal, or general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Mingkwan Wongyingsinn Pasawang Kohmongkoludom Atthaphorn Trakarnsanga Navin Horthongkham |
author_sort |
Mingkwan Wongyingsinn |
title |
Postoperative clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers after inguinal hernia repair using local, spinal, or general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial. |
title_short |
Postoperative clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers after inguinal hernia repair using local, spinal, or general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial. |
title_full |
Postoperative clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers after inguinal hernia repair using local, spinal, or general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial. |
title_fullStr |
Postoperative clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers after inguinal hernia repair using local, spinal, or general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Postoperative clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers after inguinal hernia repair using local, spinal, or general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial. |
title_sort |
postoperative clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers after inguinal hernia repair using local, spinal, or general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
<h4>Background</h4>No consensus has yet been reached regarding the best anesthetic technique for inguinal hernia repair. This study aimed to compare postoperative clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers among patients who were anesthetized using local, spinal, or general anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair.<h4>Methods</h4>This randomized controlled trial included patients scheduled to undergo elective unilateral inguinal hernioplasty at Siriraj Hospital during November 2014 to September 2015 study period. Patients were randomly assigned to the local (LA), spinal (SA), or general (GA) anesthesia groups. Primary outcomes were postoperative pain at rest and on mobilization at 8 and 24 hours after surgery.<h4>Results</h4>Fifty-four patients were included, with 18 patients randomly assigned to each group. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics were similar among groups. There were no significant differences among groups for postoperative pain at rest or on mobilization at 8 and 24 hours after surgery. No significant differences were observed for interleukin-1β, interleukin-6, and interleukin-10 at any time points in any groups. Patients with local anesthesia was associated with less time spent in anesthesia (p = 0.010) and surgery (p = 0.009), lower intraoperative cost (p = 0.003) and total cost in hospital (p = 0.036); however, patient satisfaction in the local anesthesia group (94/100) was statistically significantly lower than the spinal and general anesthesia groups (100/100) (p = 0.010).<h4>Conclusions</h4>No statistically significant difference was observed among groups for postoperative pain scores, duration of hospital stays, complications, or change in inflammatory markers. However, time spent in anesthesia and surgery, the intraoperative cost and total cost for hernia repair, and patient satisfaction were significantly lower in the local anesthesia group than in the other two groups. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242925 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mingkwanwongyingsinn postoperativeclinicaloutcomesandinflammatorymarkersafteringuinalherniarepairusinglocalspinalorgeneralanesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pasawangkohmongkoludom postoperativeclinicaloutcomesandinflammatorymarkersafteringuinalherniarepairusinglocalspinalorgeneralanesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT atthaphorntrakarnsanga postoperativeclinicaloutcomesandinflammatorymarkersafteringuinalherniarepairusinglocalspinalorgeneralanesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT navinhorthongkham postoperativeclinicaloutcomesandinflammatorymarkersafteringuinalherniarepairusinglocalspinalorgeneralanesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial |
_version_ |
1714802483984859136 |