Predicting the unpredictable: Critical analysis and practical implications of predictive anticipatory activity

A recent meta-analysis of experiments from seven independent laboratories (n=26) published since 1978 indicates that the human body can apparently detect randomly delivered stimuli occurring 1-10 seconds in the future (Mossbridge, Tressoldi, & Utts, 2012). The key observation in these studies i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julia eMossbridge, Patrizio E Tressoldi, Jessica eUtts, John eIves, Dean eRadin, Wayne eJonas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00146/full
id doaj-404a8064a04640b4b0f2db47f24c42b7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-404a8064a04640b4b0f2db47f24c42b72020-11-25T02:02:58ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience1662-51612014-03-01810.3389/fnhum.2014.0014681711Predicting the unpredictable: Critical analysis and practical implications of predictive anticipatory activityJulia eMossbridge0Patrizio E Tressoldi1Jessica eUtts2John eIves3Dean eRadin4Wayne eJonas5Northwestern UniversityUniversita di PadovaUniversity of California at IrvineSamueli InstituteInstitute of Noetic SciencesSamueli InstituteA recent meta-analysis of experiments from seven independent laboratories (n=26) published since 1978 indicates that the human body can apparently detect randomly delivered stimuli occurring 1-10 seconds in the future (Mossbridge, Tressoldi, & Utts, 2012). The key observation in these studies is that human physiology appears to be able to distinguish between unpredictable dichotomous future stimuli, such as emotional vs. neutral images or sound vs. silence. This phenomenon has been called presentiment (as in feeling the future). In this paper we call it predictive anticipatory activity or PAA. The phenomenon is predictive because it can distinguish between upcoming stimuli; it is anticipatory because the physiological changes occur before a future event; and it is an activity because it involves changes in the cardiopulmonary, skin, and/or nervous systems. <br/>PAA is an unconscious phenomenon that seems to be a time-reversed reflection of the usual physiological response to a stimulus. It appears to resemble precognition (consciously knowing something is going to happen before it does), but PAA specifically refers to unconscious physiological reactions as opposed to conscious premonitions. Though it is possible that PAA underlies the conscious experience of precognition, experiments testing this idea have not produced clear results. <br/>The first part of this paper reviews the evidence for PAA and examines the two most difficult challenges for obtaining valid evidence for it: expectation bias and multiple analyses. The second part speculates on possible mechanisms and the theoretical implications of PAA for understanding physiology and consciousness. The third part examines potential practical applications. <br/>http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00146/fullpredictive codingtemporal processingpresentimentanticipatory activityneural prediction
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Julia eMossbridge
Patrizio E Tressoldi
Jessica eUtts
John eIves
Dean eRadin
Wayne eJonas
spellingShingle Julia eMossbridge
Patrizio E Tressoldi
Jessica eUtts
John eIves
Dean eRadin
Wayne eJonas
Predicting the unpredictable: Critical analysis and practical implications of predictive anticipatory activity
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
predictive coding
temporal processing
presentiment
anticipatory activity
neural prediction
author_facet Julia eMossbridge
Patrizio E Tressoldi
Jessica eUtts
John eIves
Dean eRadin
Wayne eJonas
author_sort Julia eMossbridge
title Predicting the unpredictable: Critical analysis and practical implications of predictive anticipatory activity
title_short Predicting the unpredictable: Critical analysis and practical implications of predictive anticipatory activity
title_full Predicting the unpredictable: Critical analysis and practical implications of predictive anticipatory activity
title_fullStr Predicting the unpredictable: Critical analysis and practical implications of predictive anticipatory activity
title_full_unstemmed Predicting the unpredictable: Critical analysis and practical implications of predictive anticipatory activity
title_sort predicting the unpredictable: critical analysis and practical implications of predictive anticipatory activity
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
issn 1662-5161
publishDate 2014-03-01
description A recent meta-analysis of experiments from seven independent laboratories (n=26) published since 1978 indicates that the human body can apparently detect randomly delivered stimuli occurring 1-10 seconds in the future (Mossbridge, Tressoldi, & Utts, 2012). The key observation in these studies is that human physiology appears to be able to distinguish between unpredictable dichotomous future stimuli, such as emotional vs. neutral images or sound vs. silence. This phenomenon has been called presentiment (as in feeling the future). In this paper we call it predictive anticipatory activity or PAA. The phenomenon is predictive because it can distinguish between upcoming stimuli; it is anticipatory because the physiological changes occur before a future event; and it is an activity because it involves changes in the cardiopulmonary, skin, and/or nervous systems. <br/>PAA is an unconscious phenomenon that seems to be a time-reversed reflection of the usual physiological response to a stimulus. It appears to resemble precognition (consciously knowing something is going to happen before it does), but PAA specifically refers to unconscious physiological reactions as opposed to conscious premonitions. Though it is possible that PAA underlies the conscious experience of precognition, experiments testing this idea have not produced clear results. <br/>The first part of this paper reviews the evidence for PAA and examines the two most difficult challenges for obtaining valid evidence for it: expectation bias and multiple analyses. The second part speculates on possible mechanisms and the theoretical implications of PAA for understanding physiology and consciousness. The third part examines potential practical applications. <br/>
topic predictive coding
temporal processing
presentiment
anticipatory activity
neural prediction
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00146/full
work_keys_str_mv AT juliaemossbridge predictingtheunpredictablecriticalanalysisandpracticalimplicationsofpredictiveanticipatoryactivity
AT patrizioetressoldi predictingtheunpredictablecriticalanalysisandpracticalimplicationsofpredictiveanticipatoryactivity
AT jessicaeutts predictingtheunpredictablecriticalanalysisandpracticalimplicationsofpredictiveanticipatoryactivity
AT johneives predictingtheunpredictablecriticalanalysisandpracticalimplicationsofpredictiveanticipatoryactivity
AT deaneradin predictingtheunpredictablecriticalanalysisandpracticalimplicationsofpredictiveanticipatoryactivity
AT wayneejonas predictingtheunpredictablecriticalanalysisandpracticalimplicationsofpredictiveanticipatoryactivity
_version_ 1724950299799453696