Les sources des textes d’abaque italiens du XIVe siècle: les échos d’un débat en cours

The most common opinion among historians of mathematics is that Fibonacci’s Liber Abaci – or at least the first eleven chapters – was the precursor of the Italian textual tradition of the Abacus and, with respect to the origin of Abacus algebra in Italian, the Libro di ragioni from Paolo Gerardi (1...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Eva Caianiello
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Università di Napoli Federico II 2013-12-01
Series:Reti Medievali Rivista
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.politics.unina.it/index.php/rm/article/view/4989
id doaj-4047a374a40b45a487bfbbb4814207b9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4047a374a40b45a487bfbbb4814207b92020-12-02T13:13:10ZdeuUniversità di Napoli Federico IIReti Medievali Rivista1593-22142013-12-0114210.6092/1593-2214/4083721Les sources des textes d’abaque italiens du XIVe siècle: les échos d’un débat en coursEva Caianiello0École des hautes études en sciences sociales, Paris The most common opinion among historians of mathematics is that Fibonacci’s Liber Abaci – or at least the first eleven chapters – was the precursor of the Italian textual tradition of the Abacus and, with respect to the origin of Abacus algebra in Italian, the Libro di ragioni from Paolo Gerardi (1328) was the oldest text on algebra so far known. These ideas have been challenged by many works of J. Høyrup. He maintains that Fibonacci was not a precursor, but only an important exponent of pre-existing Abacus tradition and that the first algebra text in Italian was the Tractatus Algorismi by Jacopo da Firenze. In particular, he articulated all his positions in his book, Jacopo da Firenze’s Tractatus Algorismi Abbacus and Early Italian Culture, which has been the subject of a debate. The author of this article tries to summarize the central theses of Høyrup and explain the different positions taken by the participants in the debate. She will also explain her position in a few cases and her final point of view. http://www.politics.unina.it/index.php/rm/article/view/4989Leonardo FibonacciEdizione critica del Liber Abacimatematica medievale
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eva Caianiello
spellingShingle Eva Caianiello
Les sources des textes d’abaque italiens du XIVe siècle: les échos d’un débat en cours
Reti Medievali Rivista
Leonardo Fibonacci
Edizione critica del Liber Abaci
matematica medievale
author_facet Eva Caianiello
author_sort Eva Caianiello
title Les sources des textes d’abaque italiens du XIVe siècle: les échos d’un débat en cours
title_short Les sources des textes d’abaque italiens du XIVe siècle: les échos d’un débat en cours
title_full Les sources des textes d’abaque italiens du XIVe siècle: les échos d’un débat en cours
title_fullStr Les sources des textes d’abaque italiens du XIVe siècle: les échos d’un débat en cours
title_full_unstemmed Les sources des textes d’abaque italiens du XIVe siècle: les échos d’un débat en cours
title_sort les sources des textes d’abaque italiens du xive siècle: les échos d’un débat en cours
publisher Università di Napoli Federico II
series Reti Medievali Rivista
issn 1593-2214
publishDate 2013-12-01
description The most common opinion among historians of mathematics is that Fibonacci’s Liber Abaci – or at least the first eleven chapters – was the precursor of the Italian textual tradition of the Abacus and, with respect to the origin of Abacus algebra in Italian, the Libro di ragioni from Paolo Gerardi (1328) was the oldest text on algebra so far known. These ideas have been challenged by many works of J. Høyrup. He maintains that Fibonacci was not a precursor, but only an important exponent of pre-existing Abacus tradition and that the first algebra text in Italian was the Tractatus Algorismi by Jacopo da Firenze. In particular, he articulated all his positions in his book, Jacopo da Firenze’s Tractatus Algorismi Abbacus and Early Italian Culture, which has been the subject of a debate. The author of this article tries to summarize the central theses of Høyrup and explain the different positions taken by the participants in the debate. She will also explain her position in a few cases and her final point of view.
topic Leonardo Fibonacci
Edizione critica del Liber Abaci
matematica medievale
url http://www.politics.unina.it/index.php/rm/article/view/4989
work_keys_str_mv AT evacaianiello lessourcesdestextesdabaqueitaliensduxivesieclelesechosdundebatencours
_version_ 1724406196421525504