Optimisation and assessment of three modern touch screen tablet computers for clinical vision testing.
Technological advances have led to the development of powerful yet portable tablet computers whose touch-screen resolutions now permit the presentation of targets small enough to test the limits of normal visual acuity. Such devices have become ubiquitous in daily life and are moving into the clinic...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3997358?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-4040fe1143e54d3b8cc347bc8e1d6961 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4040fe1143e54d3b8cc347bc8e1d69612020-11-25T01:52:54ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0194e9507410.1371/journal.pone.0095074Optimisation and assessment of three modern touch screen tablet computers for clinical vision testing.Humza J TahirIan J MurrayNeil R A ParryTariq M AslamTechnological advances have led to the development of powerful yet portable tablet computers whose touch-screen resolutions now permit the presentation of targets small enough to test the limits of normal visual acuity. Such devices have become ubiquitous in daily life and are moving into the clinical space. However, in order to produce clinically valid tests, it is important to identify the limits imposed by the screen characteristics, such as resolution, brightness uniformity, contrast linearity and the effect of viewing angle. Previously we have conducted such tests on the iPad 3. Here we extend our investigations to 2 other devices and outline a protocol for calibrating such screens, using standardised methods to measure the gamma function, warm up time, screen uniformity and the effects of viewing angle and screen reflections. We demonstrate that all three devices manifest typical gamma functions for voltage and luminance with warm up times of approximately 15 minutes. However, there were differences in homogeneity and reflectance among the displays. We suggest practical means to optimise quality of display for vision testing including screen calibration.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3997358?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Humza J Tahir Ian J Murray Neil R A Parry Tariq M Aslam |
spellingShingle |
Humza J Tahir Ian J Murray Neil R A Parry Tariq M Aslam Optimisation and assessment of three modern touch screen tablet computers for clinical vision testing. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Humza J Tahir Ian J Murray Neil R A Parry Tariq M Aslam |
author_sort |
Humza J Tahir |
title |
Optimisation and assessment of three modern touch screen tablet computers for clinical vision testing. |
title_short |
Optimisation and assessment of three modern touch screen tablet computers for clinical vision testing. |
title_full |
Optimisation and assessment of three modern touch screen tablet computers for clinical vision testing. |
title_fullStr |
Optimisation and assessment of three modern touch screen tablet computers for clinical vision testing. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Optimisation and assessment of three modern touch screen tablet computers for clinical vision testing. |
title_sort |
optimisation and assessment of three modern touch screen tablet computers for clinical vision testing. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2014-01-01 |
description |
Technological advances have led to the development of powerful yet portable tablet computers whose touch-screen resolutions now permit the presentation of targets small enough to test the limits of normal visual acuity. Such devices have become ubiquitous in daily life and are moving into the clinical space. However, in order to produce clinically valid tests, it is important to identify the limits imposed by the screen characteristics, such as resolution, brightness uniformity, contrast linearity and the effect of viewing angle. Previously we have conducted such tests on the iPad 3. Here we extend our investigations to 2 other devices and outline a protocol for calibrating such screens, using standardised methods to measure the gamma function, warm up time, screen uniformity and the effects of viewing angle and screen reflections. We demonstrate that all three devices manifest typical gamma functions for voltage and luminance with warm up times of approximately 15 minutes. However, there were differences in homogeneity and reflectance among the displays. We suggest practical means to optimise quality of display for vision testing including screen calibration. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3997358?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT humzajtahir optimisationandassessmentofthreemoderntouchscreentabletcomputersforclinicalvisiontesting AT ianjmurray optimisationandassessmentofthreemoderntouchscreentabletcomputersforclinicalvisiontesting AT neilraparry optimisationandassessmentofthreemoderntouchscreentabletcomputersforclinicalvisiontesting AT tariqmaslam optimisationandassessmentofthreemoderntouchscreentabletcomputersforclinicalvisiontesting |
_version_ |
1724992144721051648 |