Pit and Fissure Sealants with Different Materials: Resin Based x Glass Ionomer Cement – Results after Six Months

Objective: To compare the retention and superficial characteristics between a new resin-modified glass ionomer sealant and resin sealant. In addition, the teeth sealed were compared to partially erupted first molars (control group) without sealing in relation to the incidence of dental caries. Mater...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Priscilla Santana Pinto Gonçalves, Tatiana Yuriko Kobayashi, Thais Marchini de Oliveira, Heitor Marques Honório, Daniela Rios, Salete Moura Bonifácio da Silva
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association of Support to Oral Health Research (APESB) 2016-01-01
Series:Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada
Online Access:http://revista.uepb.edu.br/index.php/pboci/article/view/2981/pdf
id doaj-403a66b64bb54f6ab6088ee65a7c1242
record_format Article
spelling doaj-403a66b64bb54f6ab6088ee65a7c12422020-11-25T00:27:26ZengAssociation of Support to Oral Health Research (APESB)Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada1519-05011983-46322016-01-01161http://dx.doi.org/10.4034/PBOCI.2016.161.02Pit and Fissure Sealants with Different Materials: Resin Based x Glass Ionomer Cement – Results after Six MonthsPriscilla Santana Pinto GonçalvesTatiana Yuriko KobayashiThais Marchini de OliveiraHeitor Marques HonórioDaniela RiosSalete Moura Bonifácio da SilvaObjective: To compare the retention and superficial characteristics between a new resin-modified glass ionomer sealant and resin sealant. In addition, the teeth sealed were compared to partially erupted first molars (control group) without sealing in relation to the incidence of dental caries. Material and Methods: Initially, 31 children aged 6-8 years participated in this study. The study children showed caries history, but had at least two healthy first molars. A total of 114 teeth were randomly divided into three groups: Clinpro (n=36), Fluroshield (n=38), and control (n=40). The two sealants were applied under relative isolation after previous prophylaxis and enamel etching with phosphoric acid 35% (15s). Clinical evaluation was performed by two calibrated examiners. They evaluated the retention and surface characteristics of the occlusal surface. Results: Fluroshield® showed significantly greater retention than ClinproTM Varnish® XT (p=0.002). However, the performance analysis of the success and failure of retention presented no significant difference between the materials (p=0.141). Concerning to the surface characteristics, Fluroshield performed better than Clinpro after analyzing the marginal deterioration, marginal discoloration, and superficial discoloration (p<0.05). The surface texture of the materials under study was similar (p=0.071). Sealed groups (Clinpro=Fluroshield) showed similar performance in the prevention of dental caries, which was significantly lower than that of control group (p=0.001). Conclusion: Both sealants, Fluroshield® and Clinpro TM Varnish® XT were effective in preventing caries lesion within 6 months, although Fluroshield sealant showed better clinical retention.http://revista.uepb.edu.br/index.php/pboci/article/view/2981/pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Priscilla Santana Pinto Gonçalves
Tatiana Yuriko Kobayashi
Thais Marchini de Oliveira
Heitor Marques Honório
Daniela Rios
Salete Moura Bonifácio da Silva
spellingShingle Priscilla Santana Pinto Gonçalves
Tatiana Yuriko Kobayashi
Thais Marchini de Oliveira
Heitor Marques Honório
Daniela Rios
Salete Moura Bonifácio da Silva
Pit and Fissure Sealants with Different Materials: Resin Based x Glass Ionomer Cement – Results after Six Months
Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada
author_facet Priscilla Santana Pinto Gonçalves
Tatiana Yuriko Kobayashi
Thais Marchini de Oliveira
Heitor Marques Honório
Daniela Rios
Salete Moura Bonifácio da Silva
author_sort Priscilla Santana Pinto Gonçalves
title Pit and Fissure Sealants with Different Materials: Resin Based x Glass Ionomer Cement – Results after Six Months
title_short Pit and Fissure Sealants with Different Materials: Resin Based x Glass Ionomer Cement – Results after Six Months
title_full Pit and Fissure Sealants with Different Materials: Resin Based x Glass Ionomer Cement – Results after Six Months
title_fullStr Pit and Fissure Sealants with Different Materials: Resin Based x Glass Ionomer Cement – Results after Six Months
title_full_unstemmed Pit and Fissure Sealants with Different Materials: Resin Based x Glass Ionomer Cement – Results after Six Months
title_sort pit and fissure sealants with different materials: resin based x glass ionomer cement – results after six months
publisher Association of Support to Oral Health Research (APESB)
series Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada
issn 1519-0501
1983-4632
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Objective: To compare the retention and superficial characteristics between a new resin-modified glass ionomer sealant and resin sealant. In addition, the teeth sealed were compared to partially erupted first molars (control group) without sealing in relation to the incidence of dental caries. Material and Methods: Initially, 31 children aged 6-8 years participated in this study. The study children showed caries history, but had at least two healthy first molars. A total of 114 teeth were randomly divided into three groups: Clinpro (n=36), Fluroshield (n=38), and control (n=40). The two sealants were applied under relative isolation after previous prophylaxis and enamel etching with phosphoric acid 35% (15s). Clinical evaluation was performed by two calibrated examiners. They evaluated the retention and surface characteristics of the occlusal surface. Results: Fluroshield® showed significantly greater retention than ClinproTM Varnish® XT (p=0.002). However, the performance analysis of the success and failure of retention presented no significant difference between the materials (p=0.141). Concerning to the surface characteristics, Fluroshield performed better than Clinpro after analyzing the marginal deterioration, marginal discoloration, and superficial discoloration (p<0.05). The surface texture of the materials under study was similar (p=0.071). Sealed groups (Clinpro=Fluroshield) showed similar performance in the prevention of dental caries, which was significantly lower than that of control group (p=0.001). Conclusion: Both sealants, Fluroshield® and Clinpro TM Varnish® XT were effective in preventing caries lesion within 6 months, although Fluroshield sealant showed better clinical retention.
url http://revista.uepb.edu.br/index.php/pboci/article/view/2981/pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT priscillasantanapintogoncalves pitandfissuresealantswithdifferentmaterialsresinbasedxglassionomercementresultsaftersixmonths
AT tatianayurikokobayashi pitandfissuresealantswithdifferentmaterialsresinbasedxglassionomercementresultsaftersixmonths
AT thaismarchinideoliveira pitandfissuresealantswithdifferentmaterialsresinbasedxglassionomercementresultsaftersixmonths
AT heitormarqueshonorio pitandfissuresealantswithdifferentmaterialsresinbasedxglassionomercementresultsaftersixmonths
AT danielarios pitandfissuresealantswithdifferentmaterialsresinbasedxglassionomercementresultsaftersixmonths
AT saletemourabonifaciodasilva pitandfissuresealantswithdifferentmaterialsresinbasedxglassionomercementresultsaftersixmonths
_version_ 1725339748919148544