Federalisme as ’n proses: ’n evaluering van die federalistiese momente in die 1996-grondwet

Federalism as a process: An evaluation of federalist moments in South Africa’s final Constitution of 1996 In this article the federalist elements in South Africa's final Constitution of 1996 are assessed. It is shown that due to historical forces the fullest possible (or “ideal") form of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lourens M. du Plessis
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: Scriber Editorial Systems 1997-01-01
Series:Koers : Bulletin for Christian Scholarship
Online Access:https://www.koersjournal.org.za/index.php/koers/article/view/564
id doaj-403890bd3cd5403b92d94254c697052c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-403890bd3cd5403b92d94254c697052c2020-11-25T01:25:03ZafrScriber Editorial SystemsKoers : Bulletin for Christian Scholarship0023-270X2304-85571997-01-0162210.4102/koers.v62i2.564Federalisme as ’n proses: ’n evaluering van die federalistiese momente in die 1996-grondwetLourens M. du Plessis0Departement Publiekreg Universiteit van Stellenbosch STELLENBOSCH Federalism as a process: An evaluation of federalist moments in South Africa’s final Constitution of 1996 In this article the federalist elements in South Africa's final Constitution of 1996 are assessed. It is shown that due to historical forces the fullest possible (or “ideal") form of federalism has hardly been attainable in South Africa. This did not, however, result in a total exclusion of everything federalist in the final Constitution. Federalist structures are relatively weakly defined but provision is made fo r procedures which could give wings to centrifugal forces determining the relationship between central government and the newly-created geographical components of the state (i.e. the nine provinces). These centrifugal forces are subject to centripetal checks and balances which do not, however, totally exclude the attainment of a relatively clearly pronounced federal state. Much will depend on how procedures and conflict resolution mechanisms provided fo r in the Constitution will be used. The federalist characteristics of the new South African state were not finally decreed by those negotiating the contents and "direction ” of decentralist elements in the final Constitution. It is thus difficult to define South Africa as either a federation or a union. It is probably best described as an essentially unitary state divided into geographical units which could, in the course o f time, differentiate into more pronounced components of a federal state in the classical sense. https://www.koersjournal.org.za/index.php/koers/article/view/564
collection DOAJ
language Afrikaans
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lourens M. du Plessis
spellingShingle Lourens M. du Plessis
Federalisme as ’n proses: ’n evaluering van die federalistiese momente in die 1996-grondwet
Koers : Bulletin for Christian Scholarship
author_facet Lourens M. du Plessis
author_sort Lourens M. du Plessis
title Federalisme as ’n proses: ’n evaluering van die federalistiese momente in die 1996-grondwet
title_short Federalisme as ’n proses: ’n evaluering van die federalistiese momente in die 1996-grondwet
title_full Federalisme as ’n proses: ’n evaluering van die federalistiese momente in die 1996-grondwet
title_fullStr Federalisme as ’n proses: ’n evaluering van die federalistiese momente in die 1996-grondwet
title_full_unstemmed Federalisme as ’n proses: ’n evaluering van die federalistiese momente in die 1996-grondwet
title_sort federalisme as ’n proses: ’n evaluering van die federalistiese momente in die 1996-grondwet
publisher Scriber Editorial Systems
series Koers : Bulletin for Christian Scholarship
issn 0023-270X
2304-8557
publishDate 1997-01-01
description Federalism as a process: An evaluation of federalist moments in South Africa’s final Constitution of 1996 In this article the federalist elements in South Africa's final Constitution of 1996 are assessed. It is shown that due to historical forces the fullest possible (or “ideal") form of federalism has hardly been attainable in South Africa. This did not, however, result in a total exclusion of everything federalist in the final Constitution. Federalist structures are relatively weakly defined but provision is made fo r procedures which could give wings to centrifugal forces determining the relationship between central government and the newly-created geographical components of the state (i.e. the nine provinces). These centrifugal forces are subject to centripetal checks and balances which do not, however, totally exclude the attainment of a relatively clearly pronounced federal state. Much will depend on how procedures and conflict resolution mechanisms provided fo r in the Constitution will be used. The federalist characteristics of the new South African state were not finally decreed by those negotiating the contents and "direction ” of decentralist elements in the final Constitution. It is thus difficult to define South Africa as either a federation or a union. It is probably best described as an essentially unitary state divided into geographical units which could, in the course o f time, differentiate into more pronounced components of a federal state in the classical sense.
url https://www.koersjournal.org.za/index.php/koers/article/view/564
work_keys_str_mv AT lourensmduplessis federalismeasnprosesnevalueringvandiefederalistiesemomenteindie1996grondwet
_version_ 1725115563589500928