Studies on A. Einstein, B. Podolsky and N. Rosen argument that “quantum mechanics is not a complete theory,” II: Apparent confirmation of the EPR argument
In1935, A.Einsteinexpressedhishistoricalview, jointly with B.Podolsky and N. Rosen, that quantum mechanics could be “completed” into a form recovering classical determinism at least under limit conditions (EPR argument). In the preceding Paper I, we have outlined the basic methods underlying the “co...
Main Author: | Ruggero Maria Santilli |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Accademia Piceno Aprutina dei Velati
2020-06-01
|
Series: | Ratio Mathematica |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eiris.it/ojs/index.php/ratiomathematica/article/view/517 |
Similar Items
-
Studies on A. Einstein , B. Podolsky and N. Rosen argument that ”quantum mechanics is not a complete theory,” I: Basic methods
by: Ruggero Maria Santilli
Published: (2020-06-01) -
Studies on A. Einstein. B. Podolsky and N. Rosen argument that “quantum mechanics is not a complete theory,” III: Illustrative examples and applications
by: Ruggero Maria Santilli
Published: (2020-06-01) -
Studies on the classical determinism predicted by A. Einstein, B. Podolsky and N. Rosen
by: Ruggero Maria Santilli
Published: (2019-12-01) -
The Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen Steering and Its Certification
by: Yi-Zheng Zhen, et al.
Published: (2019-04-01) -
Multipartite Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Steering and Quantum Information Processing
by: Yen-TeLu, et al.
Published: (2016)