Building Relationships or Building Roadblocks? A Look at the Winnipeg Urban Aboriginal Strategy

Do Aboriginal–state public consultations allow for the effective participation of Aboriginal participants in the democratic process, given the group’s political marginalization? This paper argues that public consultations are an effective tool for ensuring the successful participation of Aboriginal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mai Nguyen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Alberta 2014-03-01
Series:Aboriginal Policy Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/aps/index.php/aps/article/view/17474
id doaj-40191a7676c149faab51f84932e55fb4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-40191a7676c149faab51f84932e55fb42020-11-25T03:51:05ZengUniversity of AlbertaAboriginal Policy Studies1923-32992014-03-0131-210.5663/aps.v3i1&2.1747417474Building Relationships or Building Roadblocks? A Look at the Winnipeg Urban Aboriginal StrategyMai NguyenDo Aboriginal–state public consultations allow for the effective participation of Aboriginal participants in the democratic process, given the group’s political marginalization? This paper argues that public consultations are an effective tool for ensuring the successful participation of Aboriginal groups when the consultation process includes mechanisms for redistributing power from governments to stakeholders. Specifically, this paper looks at the federal government’s current Urban Aboriginal Strategy (UAS) in Winnipeg. Although the direction and tone of the UAS is set by the federal government, the members of the Steering Committee, composed of twelve Aboriginal members and three government officials, are the ones who decide which policies and programs will receive funding. Decision-making is done through ongoing consultation with the Steering Committee and the Aboriginal community at large. Employing ideas in Arnstein (1969) and public consultations literature to create an evaluation framework, this paper identifies critical components that must be present for consultations to be fruitful. And, based on interviews with the Steering Committee, it finds that the UAS in Winnipeg is a successful mechanism for enabling the effective participation of Aboriginal participants in the democratic process—a process which is resulting in the construction of a renewed Aboriginal–state political relationship.https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/aps/index.php/aps/article/view/17474public consultationdecision-makingaboriginal engagement
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mai Nguyen
spellingShingle Mai Nguyen
Building Relationships or Building Roadblocks? A Look at the Winnipeg Urban Aboriginal Strategy
Aboriginal Policy Studies
public consultation
decision-making
aboriginal engagement
author_facet Mai Nguyen
author_sort Mai Nguyen
title Building Relationships or Building Roadblocks? A Look at the Winnipeg Urban Aboriginal Strategy
title_short Building Relationships or Building Roadblocks? A Look at the Winnipeg Urban Aboriginal Strategy
title_full Building Relationships or Building Roadblocks? A Look at the Winnipeg Urban Aboriginal Strategy
title_fullStr Building Relationships or Building Roadblocks? A Look at the Winnipeg Urban Aboriginal Strategy
title_full_unstemmed Building Relationships or Building Roadblocks? A Look at the Winnipeg Urban Aboriginal Strategy
title_sort building relationships or building roadblocks? a look at the winnipeg urban aboriginal strategy
publisher University of Alberta
series Aboriginal Policy Studies
issn 1923-3299
publishDate 2014-03-01
description Do Aboriginal–state public consultations allow for the effective participation of Aboriginal participants in the democratic process, given the group’s political marginalization? This paper argues that public consultations are an effective tool for ensuring the successful participation of Aboriginal groups when the consultation process includes mechanisms for redistributing power from governments to stakeholders. Specifically, this paper looks at the federal government’s current Urban Aboriginal Strategy (UAS) in Winnipeg. Although the direction and tone of the UAS is set by the federal government, the members of the Steering Committee, composed of twelve Aboriginal members and three government officials, are the ones who decide which policies and programs will receive funding. Decision-making is done through ongoing consultation with the Steering Committee and the Aboriginal community at large. Employing ideas in Arnstein (1969) and public consultations literature to create an evaluation framework, this paper identifies critical components that must be present for consultations to be fruitful. And, based on interviews with the Steering Committee, it finds that the UAS in Winnipeg is a successful mechanism for enabling the effective participation of Aboriginal participants in the democratic process—a process which is resulting in the construction of a renewed Aboriginal–state political relationship.
topic public consultation
decision-making
aboriginal engagement
url https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/aps/index.php/aps/article/view/17474
work_keys_str_mv AT mainguyen buildingrelationshipsorbuildingroadblocksalookatthewinnipegurbanaboriginalstrategy
_version_ 1724488933506547712